张力计、导热系数和电容传感器测量粘土柱孔隙水压力的比较

I. Indrawan, David J. Williams, A. Scheuermann
{"title":"张力计、导热系数和电容传感器测量粘土柱孔隙水压力的比较","authors":"I. Indrawan, David J. Williams, A. Scheuermann","doi":"10.1201/B17034-232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real-time pore water pressure measurements have been made automatically and continuously with tensiometer (GT), Thermal Conductivity (TC) and capacitance (MP) sensors in laboratory compacted clay columns. Although GT, TC and MP sensors have been commonly used in many applications, there has rarely been any attempt to compare the measurements made by the different sensors or to evaluate their long-term performance, especially for application in compacted clay in a high salinity environment and under a high hydraulic gradient. In this study, GT, TC and MP sensors were calibrated and subsequently installed at various elevations in 303 mm diameter by 300 mm high compacted clay columns subjected to wetting by a 100 kPa saline water pressure, followed by subsequent drying. The calibration and measurement results showed that the GT sensors allowed measurements not only of negative pore water pressure, but also of positive pore water pressure. While the GT sensors allowed the measurement of pore water pressure down to -80 kPa, the TC and MP sensors were able to measure much higher negative pore water pressures. The TC and MP sensors were, however, found to have large sensor-to-sensor variations, hysteretic behaviour upon drying and wetting, and slow equilibration times. Unlike the GT and TC sensors, the long-term performance of the MP sensors was found to be affected by the salinity of the compacted clay.","PeriodicalId":294644,"journal":{"name":"Unsaturated Soils: Research & Applications","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of tensiometer, thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns\",\"authors\":\"I. Indrawan, David J. Williams, A. Scheuermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/B17034-232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Real-time pore water pressure measurements have been made automatically and continuously with tensiometer (GT), Thermal Conductivity (TC) and capacitance (MP) sensors in laboratory compacted clay columns. Although GT, TC and MP sensors have been commonly used in many applications, there has rarely been any attempt to compare the measurements made by the different sensors or to evaluate their long-term performance, especially for application in compacted clay in a high salinity environment and under a high hydraulic gradient. In this study, GT, TC and MP sensors were calibrated and subsequently installed at various elevations in 303 mm diameter by 300 mm high compacted clay columns subjected to wetting by a 100 kPa saline water pressure, followed by subsequent drying. The calibration and measurement results showed that the GT sensors allowed measurements not only of negative pore water pressure, but also of positive pore water pressure. While the GT sensors allowed the measurement of pore water pressure down to -80 kPa, the TC and MP sensors were able to measure much higher negative pore water pressures. The TC and MP sensors were, however, found to have large sensor-to-sensor variations, hysteretic behaviour upon drying and wetting, and slow equilibration times. Unlike the GT and TC sensors, the long-term performance of the MP sensors was found to be affected by the salinity of the compacted clay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unsaturated Soils: Research & Applications\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unsaturated Soils: Research & Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/B17034-232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unsaturated Soils: Research & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/B17034-232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用张力计(GT)、导热系数(TC)和电容(MP)传感器,在实验室压实粘土柱中实现了孔隙水压力的自动连续实时测量。虽然GT、TC和MP传感器在许多应用中都很常用,但很少有人尝试比较不同传感器的测量结果或评估它们的长期性能,特别是在高盐度环境和高水力梯度下的压实粘土中应用。在这项研究中,GT、TC和MP传感器经过校准,随后安装在直径为303 mm的不同海拔高度,由300 mm高的压实粘土柱进行100kpa盐水压力润湿,然后进行干燥。标定和测量结果表明,GT传感器不仅可以测量负孔隙水压力,还可以测量正孔隙水压力。GT传感器可以测量低至- 80kpa的孔隙水压力,而TC和MP传感器可以测量更高的负孔隙水压力。然而,发现TC和MP传感器具有较大的传感器到传感器的变化,干燥和润湿时的滞后行为,以及缓慢的平衡时间。与GT和TC传感器不同,MP传感器的长期性能受到压实粘土盐度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of tensiometer, thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns
Real-time pore water pressure measurements have been made automatically and continuously with tensiometer (GT), Thermal Conductivity (TC) and capacitance (MP) sensors in laboratory compacted clay columns. Although GT, TC and MP sensors have been commonly used in many applications, there has rarely been any attempt to compare the measurements made by the different sensors or to evaluate their long-term performance, especially for application in compacted clay in a high salinity environment and under a high hydraulic gradient. In this study, GT, TC and MP sensors were calibrated and subsequently installed at various elevations in 303 mm diameter by 300 mm high compacted clay columns subjected to wetting by a 100 kPa saline water pressure, followed by subsequent drying. The calibration and measurement results showed that the GT sensors allowed measurements not only of negative pore water pressure, but also of positive pore water pressure. While the GT sensors allowed the measurement of pore water pressure down to -80 kPa, the TC and MP sensors were able to measure much higher negative pore water pressures. The TC and MP sensors were, however, found to have large sensor-to-sensor variations, hysteretic behaviour upon drying and wetting, and slow equilibration times. Unlike the GT and TC sensors, the long-term performance of the MP sensors was found to be affected by the salinity of the compacted clay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信