生态

F. Valladares
{"title":"生态","authors":"F. Valladares","doi":"10.1201/9780429445651-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dobzhansky’s sweeping generalization, “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (1964, 449), provocatively captures the centrality of evolutionary theory in contemporary biological science (see also Dobzhansky 1973). But his indelible rally call is also revisionist history, and grievously partial. Although the term “ecology” was not coined until 1866 (Haeckel 1866), most of what would be deemed biological investigation that did not concern the interior of organisms since at least the time of the ancient Greeks, and long before a nascent awareness of evolutionary forces, falls squarely within the purview of ecology. The biological understanding that laid the groundwork out of which evolutionary theory emerged was largely ecological. Ecology therefore casts the same indispensable light in biology, and particularly on evolution. Ecological insights were an integral part of early evolutionary thinking; they are at the core of Darwin’s original theory; and they will remain crucial to theorizing about how evolutionary dynamics shape the biological world. Consider evolutionary theory’s central concept, natural selection. Evolution by natural selection is traditionally thought to depend on three population-level factors: phenotypic variation, heritability, and differential fitness (see Lewontin 1970). All three are biologically crucial components, and at least the latter two have garnered significant attention from philosophers of biology (on heritability, see Tabery 2014 and Downes and Matthews 2019; on fitness, see Rosenberg and Bouchard 2015).","PeriodicalId":406927,"journal":{"name":"Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biodiversity","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecology\",\"authors\":\"F. Valladares\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/9780429445651-36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dobzhansky’s sweeping generalization, “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (1964, 449), provocatively captures the centrality of evolutionary theory in contemporary biological science (see also Dobzhansky 1973). But his indelible rally call is also revisionist history, and grievously partial. Although the term “ecology” was not coined until 1866 (Haeckel 1866), most of what would be deemed biological investigation that did not concern the interior of organisms since at least the time of the ancient Greeks, and long before a nascent awareness of evolutionary forces, falls squarely within the purview of ecology. The biological understanding that laid the groundwork out of which evolutionary theory emerged was largely ecological. Ecology therefore casts the same indispensable light in biology, and particularly on evolution. Ecological insights were an integral part of early evolutionary thinking; they are at the core of Darwin’s original theory; and they will remain crucial to theorizing about how evolutionary dynamics shape the biological world. Consider evolutionary theory’s central concept, natural selection. Evolution by natural selection is traditionally thought to depend on three population-level factors: phenotypic variation, heritability, and differential fitness (see Lewontin 1970). All three are biologically crucial components, and at least the latter two have garnered significant attention from philosophers of biology (on heritability, see Tabery 2014 and Downes and Matthews 2019; on fitness, see Rosenberg and Bouchard 2015).\",\"PeriodicalId\":406927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biodiversity\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biodiversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429445651-36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429445651-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Dobzhansky的全面概括,“生物学中没有什么是有意义的,除非在进化的光下”(1964,449),挑衅地抓住了进化论在当代生物科学中的中心地位(参见Dobzhansky 1973)。但他不可磨灭的号召也是修正主义的历史,而且严重偏颇。尽管“生态学”一词直到1866年才被创造出来(海克尔1866年),但至少从古希腊时代开始,在对进化力量的初步认识出现之前很久,大多数被认为是不涉及生物内部的生物学研究,都完全属于生态学的范畴。为进化理论的出现奠定基础的生物学理解主要是生态学的。因此,生态学在生物学,尤其是在进化方面,也发挥着同样不可或缺的作用。生态学的见解是早期进化思想的一个组成部分;它们是达尔文原始理论的核心;它们将继续对进化动力学如何塑造生物世界的理论化至关重要。想想进化论的中心概念——自然选择。自然选择的进化传统上被认为取决于三个种群水平的因素:表型变异、遗传力和差异适应度(见Lewontin 1970)。这三者都是生物学上至关重要的组成部分,至少后两者已经引起了生物学哲学家的极大关注(关于遗传性,见Tabery 2014和Downes and Matthews 2019;关于健身,参见Rosenberg and Bouchard 2015)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecology
Dobzhansky’s sweeping generalization, “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (1964, 449), provocatively captures the centrality of evolutionary theory in contemporary biological science (see also Dobzhansky 1973). But his indelible rally call is also revisionist history, and grievously partial. Although the term “ecology” was not coined until 1866 (Haeckel 1866), most of what would be deemed biological investigation that did not concern the interior of organisms since at least the time of the ancient Greeks, and long before a nascent awareness of evolutionary forces, falls squarely within the purview of ecology. The biological understanding that laid the groundwork out of which evolutionary theory emerged was largely ecological. Ecology therefore casts the same indispensable light in biology, and particularly on evolution. Ecological insights were an integral part of early evolutionary thinking; they are at the core of Darwin’s original theory; and they will remain crucial to theorizing about how evolutionary dynamics shape the biological world. Consider evolutionary theory’s central concept, natural selection. Evolution by natural selection is traditionally thought to depend on three population-level factors: phenotypic variation, heritability, and differential fitness (see Lewontin 1970). All three are biologically crucial components, and at least the latter two have garnered significant attention from philosophers of biology (on heritability, see Tabery 2014 and Downes and Matthews 2019; on fitness, see Rosenberg and Bouchard 2015).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信