示范效应还是相对剥夺?古巴旅游业的反革命压力

A. Seaton
{"title":"示范效应还是相对剥夺?古巴旅游业的反革命压力","authors":"A. Seaton","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199712)3:4<307::AID-PTH93>3.0.CO;2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much has been written on how formal political systems affect tourism but little on how tourism impacts upon political culture. This paper reclaims relative deprivation theory from the field of general political sociology as an analytical framework for understanding the impact of tourism on political socialisation in host countries. The paper argues that relative deprivation theory, long established in political sociology, but never utilised in tourism-impact anlaysis, provides valuable insight into understanding the socio-cultural effects of tourism on host societies, particularly those relating to political acculturation, offering significant improvements on “demonstration effect” analysis. Relative deprivation theory can be systematically developed to specify testable hypotheses on the differential effects of tourism upon the political culture within different kinds of societies. Data from Cuba is used to support the theoretical discussion which suggests an intractable paradox – that governments in poor socialist countries which most need tourism to achieve economic growth, may be those most likely to be subverted by it politically. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":375630,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demonstration effects or relative deprivation? The counter‐revolutionary pressures of tourism in Cuba\",\"authors\":\"A. Seaton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199712)3:4<307::AID-PTH93>3.0.CO;2-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Much has been written on how formal political systems affect tourism but little on how tourism impacts upon political culture. This paper reclaims relative deprivation theory from the field of general political sociology as an analytical framework for understanding the impact of tourism on political socialisation in host countries. The paper argues that relative deprivation theory, long established in political sociology, but never utilised in tourism-impact anlaysis, provides valuable insight into understanding the socio-cultural effects of tourism on host societies, particularly those relating to political acculturation, offering significant improvements on “demonstration effect” analysis. Relative deprivation theory can be systematically developed to specify testable hypotheses on the differential effects of tourism upon the political culture within different kinds of societies. Data from Cuba is used to support the theoretical discussion which suggests an intractable paradox – that governments in poor socialist countries which most need tourism to achieve economic growth, may be those most likely to be subverted by it politically. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199712)3:4<307::AID-PTH93>3.0.CO;2-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1603(199712)3:4<307::AID-PTH93>3.0.CO;2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

关于正式政治制度如何影响旅游业的文章很多,但关于旅游业如何影响政治文化的文章却很少。本文利用一般政治社会学领域的相对剥夺理论作为理解旅游对东道国政治社会化影响的分析框架。本文认为,相对剥夺理论在政治社会学中建立已久,但从未用于旅游影响分析,它为理解旅游业对东道国社会的社会文化影响,特别是与政治文化适应有关的社会文化影响提供了有价值的见解,为“示范效应”分析提供了重大改进。相对剥夺理论可以系统地发展,以具体说明在不同类型的社会中旅游对政治文化的不同影响的可检验的假设。来自古巴的数据被用来支持理论讨论,该讨论提出了一个棘手的悖论——贫穷的社会主义国家的政府最需要旅游业来实现经济增长,但却最有可能在政治上被旅游业颠覆。©1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demonstration effects or relative deprivation? The counter‐revolutionary pressures of tourism in Cuba
Much has been written on how formal political systems affect tourism but little on how tourism impacts upon political culture. This paper reclaims relative deprivation theory from the field of general political sociology as an analytical framework for understanding the impact of tourism on political socialisation in host countries. The paper argues that relative deprivation theory, long established in political sociology, but never utilised in tourism-impact anlaysis, provides valuable insight into understanding the socio-cultural effects of tourism on host societies, particularly those relating to political acculturation, offering significant improvements on “demonstration effect” analysis. Relative deprivation theory can be systematically developed to specify testable hypotheses on the differential effects of tourism upon the political culture within different kinds of societies. Data from Cuba is used to support the theoretical discussion which suggests an intractable paradox – that governments in poor socialist countries which most need tourism to achieve economic growth, may be those most likely to be subverted by it politically. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信