引导式发现与半引导式发现学习模式对植物材料事实发现技能的效果比较

Galuh Arga Wisnu Saputra, B. Subali
{"title":"引导式发现与半引导式发现学习模式对植物材料事实发现技能的效果比较","authors":"Galuh Arga Wisnu Saputra, B. Subali","doi":"10.26555/BIOEDUKATIKA.V7I2.12547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to discover the differences in learning outcomes of fact-finding in the implementation of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models on plantae material at X grade of National 1 High School of Jetis Bantul. This research was conducted on experimental group class that carried out learning with guided discovery and the control class with semi-guided discovery learning. The design of this research was the randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The quantitative data were the learning outcomes of cognitive domain which obtained from the values of pretest and posttest, that analyzed through T test at 5% significance level. Based on the test, it was obtained p=0.000 (p<0.05) so there was a significant difference between the guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning model toward the fact-finding skill on the learning outcomes of student. The fact-finding skills of guided discovery was higher than semi-guided discovery learning with pretest average of control class students (41.53) and the experimental class (41.97), while the postest average of control class (69.75) and experimental class (80.66). The learning through the implementation of guided discovery learning model was more effective than semi-guided discovery learning model toward fact-finding skill.","PeriodicalId":391106,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness comparison of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models toward the fact-finding skill on plantae material\",\"authors\":\"Galuh Arga Wisnu Saputra, B. Subali\",\"doi\":\"10.26555/BIOEDUKATIKA.V7I2.12547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research was to discover the differences in learning outcomes of fact-finding in the implementation of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models on plantae material at X grade of National 1 High School of Jetis Bantul. This research was conducted on experimental group class that carried out learning with guided discovery and the control class with semi-guided discovery learning. The design of this research was the randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The quantitative data were the learning outcomes of cognitive domain which obtained from the values of pretest and posttest, that analyzed through T test at 5% significance level. Based on the test, it was obtained p=0.000 (p<0.05) so there was a significant difference between the guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning model toward the fact-finding skill on the learning outcomes of student. The fact-finding skills of guided discovery was higher than semi-guided discovery learning with pretest average of control class students (41.53) and the experimental class (41.97), while the postest average of control class (69.75) and experimental class (80.66). The learning through the implementation of guided discovery learning model was more effective than semi-guided discovery learning model toward fact-finding skill.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26555/BIOEDUKATIKA.V7I2.12547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/BIOEDUKATIKA.V7I2.12547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨Jetis Bantul国一中学X年级学生在实施植物材料引导式发现和半引导式发现学习模式时,事实发现学习效果的差异。本研究采用引导式发现学习的实验组和半引导式发现学习的对照组。本研究采用随机前测后测对照组设计。定量数据为认知领域的学习结果,由前测和后测所得,通过5%显著性水平的T检验进行分析。经检验,得到p=0.000 (p<0.05),说明引导式发现和半引导式发现学习模式对学生事实发现技能的学习效果有显著差异。引导式发现的事实发现技能高于半引导式发现学习,前测平均值为41.53,实验班为41.97,后测平均值为69.75,实验班为80.66。实施引导式发现学习模式对事实发现技能的学习效果优于半引导式发现学习模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness comparison of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models toward the fact-finding skill on plantae material
The purpose of this research was to discover the differences in learning outcomes of fact-finding in the implementation of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models on plantae material at X grade of National 1 High School of Jetis Bantul. This research was conducted on experimental group class that carried out learning with guided discovery and the control class with semi-guided discovery learning. The design of this research was the randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The quantitative data were the learning outcomes of cognitive domain which obtained from the values of pretest and posttest, that analyzed through T test at 5% significance level. Based on the test, it was obtained p=0.000 (p<0.05) so there was a significant difference between the guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning model toward the fact-finding skill on the learning outcomes of student. The fact-finding skills of guided discovery was higher than semi-guided discovery learning with pretest average of control class students (41.53) and the experimental class (41.97), while the postest average of control class (69.75) and experimental class (80.66). The learning through the implementation of guided discovery learning model was more effective than semi-guided discovery learning model toward fact-finding skill.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信