俄国近代史中纳粹占领时期行政通敌主义研究的问题

A. Polugodin
{"title":"俄国近代史中纳粹占领时期行政通敌主义研究的问题","authors":"A. Polugodin","doi":"10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-63-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In historical science the concept of “collaborationismˮ is defined as the cooperation with the enemy of a certain part of the population in the interests of the enemy state and to the detriment of one’s homeland. During the Soviet period this phenomenon was practically not considered for political and ideological reasons. Significant shifts began to occur with the collapse of the Soviet state and the subsequent democratisation of the political and spiritual system. In the 1990’s – the early 2000s, the military, ideological and political variant of collaboration became extremely popular among the researchers, however the administrative form of collaboration, especially on the regional level, still has dramatically poor analysis. The author of the article, analysing a significant layer of research works, tries to identify controversial and scientifically understudied directions in the consideration of administrative collaborationism. The researcher is not trying to limit himself to a superficial review of the general historiography; he rather seeks to identify the missing fragments of the study of such a complex phenomenon. The article is based on the formulation of specific issues, which at the moment are either suppressed or poorly studied.","PeriodicalId":326235,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PROBLEM OF STUDYING ADMINISTRATIVE COLLABORATIONISM DURING THE NAZI OCCUPATION IN MODERN RUSSIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY\",\"authors\":\"A. Polugodin\",\"doi\":\"10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-63-75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In historical science the concept of “collaborationismˮ is defined as the cooperation with the enemy of a certain part of the population in the interests of the enemy state and to the detriment of one’s homeland. During the Soviet period this phenomenon was practically not considered for political and ideological reasons. Significant shifts began to occur with the collapse of the Soviet state and the subsequent democratisation of the political and spiritual system. In the 1990’s – the early 2000s, the military, ideological and political variant of collaboration became extremely popular among the researchers, however the administrative form of collaboration, especially on the regional level, still has dramatically poor analysis. The author of the article, analysing a significant layer of research works, tries to identify controversial and scientifically understudied directions in the consideration of administrative collaborationism. The researcher is not trying to limit himself to a superficial review of the general historiography; he rather seeks to identify the missing fragments of the study of such a complex phenomenon. The article is based on the formulation of specific issues, which at the moment are either suppressed or poorly studied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Kostroma State University\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Kostroma State University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-63-75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-63-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在历史科学中,“合作主义”的概念被定义为为了敌国的利益而与一部分人口的敌人合作,损害自己的家园。在苏联时期,由于政治和意识形态的原因,实际上没有考虑到这一现象。随着苏联政权的崩溃和随后的政治和精神体系的民主化,重大的转变开始发生。在20世纪90年代至21世纪初,军事、意识形态和政治形式的合作在研究人员中变得非常流行,但对行政形式的合作,特别是在区域层面上的合作,分析仍然非常缺乏。本文的作者通过分析一层重要的研究成果,试图找出行政协作主义思考中存在争议和科学研究不足的方向。研究者并不试图把自己局限于对一般史学的肤浅回顾;相反,他试图找出对这种复杂现象的研究中缺失的部分。本文是建立在具体问题的提法基础上的,这些问题目前要么被压制,要么研究得很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE PROBLEM OF STUDYING ADMINISTRATIVE COLLABORATIONISM DURING THE NAZI OCCUPATION IN MODERN RUSSIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY
In historical science the concept of “collaborationismˮ is defined as the cooperation with the enemy of a certain part of the population in the interests of the enemy state and to the detriment of one’s homeland. During the Soviet period this phenomenon was practically not considered for political and ideological reasons. Significant shifts began to occur with the collapse of the Soviet state and the subsequent democratisation of the political and spiritual system. In the 1990’s – the early 2000s, the military, ideological and political variant of collaboration became extremely popular among the researchers, however the administrative form of collaboration, especially on the regional level, still has dramatically poor analysis. The author of the article, analysing a significant layer of research works, tries to identify controversial and scientifically understudied directions in the consideration of administrative collaborationism. The researcher is not trying to limit himself to a superficial review of the general historiography; he rather seeks to identify the missing fragments of the study of such a complex phenomenon. The article is based on the formulation of specific issues, which at the moment are either suppressed or poorly studied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信