建设性合作:历史遗址上抽象概念的记忆重构与语境化

Siobhan Barry
{"title":"建设性合作:历史遗址上抽象概念的记忆重构与语境化","authors":"Siobhan Barry","doi":"10.5749/preseducrese.12.2020.0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The physical memorialization of the process of remembrance attempts to encompass a collective memory charged with questions of whose memory, or whose past is being represented (Selimovic 2013). Conflict is often seen in causal terms, through a narrative of “who did what to whom” or a chronology of war and peace. Yet to memorialize the conflict and sacrifice of a multitude at a historical distance creates enormous responsibility, making sacred the concept or purpose rather than the individual. Distance exercises an influence on how history is understood, and distance and detachment are elevated to a privileged position with respect to knowledge of the past (Salber Phillips 2013). This paper aims to redress the balance and explore how spatiality and memory construct a personal experience that reflects the time of conflict from a historical distance.","PeriodicalId":211364,"journal":{"name":"Preservation Education & Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructive Collaboration: Reframing Remembrance and Contextualization of Abstractive Ideas on a Historic Site\",\"authors\":\"Siobhan Barry\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/preseducrese.12.2020.0048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The physical memorialization of the process of remembrance attempts to encompass a collective memory charged with questions of whose memory, or whose past is being represented (Selimovic 2013). Conflict is often seen in causal terms, through a narrative of “who did what to whom” or a chronology of war and peace. Yet to memorialize the conflict and sacrifice of a multitude at a historical distance creates enormous responsibility, making sacred the concept or purpose rather than the individual. Distance exercises an influence on how history is understood, and distance and detachment are elevated to a privileged position with respect to knowledge of the past (Salber Phillips 2013). This paper aims to redress the balance and explore how spatiality and memory construct a personal experience that reflects the time of conflict from a historical distance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preservation Education & Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preservation Education & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/preseducrese.12.2020.0048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preservation Education & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/preseducrese.12.2020.0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:记忆过程的物理记忆试图包含一个集体记忆,这个集体记忆充满了谁的记忆或谁的过去被代表的问题(Selimovic 2013)。冲突通常被视为因果关系,通过“谁对谁做了什么”的叙述或战争与和平的年表。然而,在历史距离之外纪念群众的冲突和牺牲带来了巨大的责任,使概念或目的变得神圣,而不是个人。距离对历史的理解产生了影响,距离和超然在过去的知识中被提升到特权地位(Salber Phillips 2013)。本文旨在纠正这种平衡,并探讨空间性和记忆如何从历史距离上构建反映冲突时间的个人体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructive Collaboration: Reframing Remembrance and Contextualization of Abstractive Ideas on a Historic Site
Abstract:The physical memorialization of the process of remembrance attempts to encompass a collective memory charged with questions of whose memory, or whose past is being represented (Selimovic 2013). Conflict is often seen in causal terms, through a narrative of “who did what to whom” or a chronology of war and peace. Yet to memorialize the conflict and sacrifice of a multitude at a historical distance creates enormous responsibility, making sacred the concept or purpose rather than the individual. Distance exercises an influence on how history is understood, and distance and detachment are elevated to a privileged position with respect to knowledge of the past (Salber Phillips 2013). This paper aims to redress the balance and explore how spatiality and memory construct a personal experience that reflects the time of conflict from a historical distance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信