{"title":"运用自动分类方法对ESL学生反思性语言学习技能进行分类","authors":"G. Cheng, J. Chau","doi":"10.1109/ICALT.2015.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports and discusses on a project about designing a digital tool to support Chinese undergraduate students in reflecting on their English language (L2) learning experience. The tool namely ACTIVE was developed primarily based on a classification framework called A-S-E-R and Latent Semantic Analysis. It can automatically classify reflective L2 learning skills into four elements with each divided into four hierarchical levels. This paper begins by presenting the background of the study, followed by the details of methods of automatic classification and performance evaluation. The results of the project indicate that the computer-generated ratings for students' reflection are comparable to human ratings.","PeriodicalId":170914,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies","volume":"368 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using an Automatic Approach to Classify Reflective Language Learning Skills of ESL Students\",\"authors\":\"G. Cheng, J. Chau\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICALT.2015.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports and discusses on a project about designing a digital tool to support Chinese undergraduate students in reflecting on their English language (L2) learning experience. The tool namely ACTIVE was developed primarily based on a classification framework called A-S-E-R and Latent Semantic Analysis. It can automatically classify reflective L2 learning skills into four elements with each divided into four hierarchical levels. This paper begins by presenting the background of the study, followed by the details of methods of automatic classification and performance evaluation. The results of the project indicate that the computer-generated ratings for students' reflection are comparable to human ratings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies\",\"volume\":\"368 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文报道并讨论了一个设计数字工具的项目,以支持中国本科生反思他们的英语语言(L2)学习经验。该工具即ACTIVE,主要是基于一个称为a - s - e - r和潜在语义分析的分类框架开发的。它可以自动将反思性第二语言学习技能分为四个元素,每个元素又分为四个层次。本文首先介绍了研究背景,然后详细介绍了自动分类和性能评价的方法。该项目的结果表明,计算机生成的学生反思评分与人类评分相当。
Using an Automatic Approach to Classify Reflective Language Learning Skills of ESL Students
This paper reports and discusses on a project about designing a digital tool to support Chinese undergraduate students in reflecting on their English language (L2) learning experience. The tool namely ACTIVE was developed primarily based on a classification framework called A-S-E-R and Latent Semantic Analysis. It can automatically classify reflective L2 learning skills into four elements with each divided into four hierarchical levels. This paper begins by presenting the background of the study, followed by the details of methods of automatic classification and performance evaluation. The results of the project indicate that the computer-generated ratings for students' reflection are comparable to human ratings.