从空中俯瞰英国铁路遗产

D. Gwyn
{"title":"从空中俯瞰英国铁路遗产","authors":"D. Gwyn","doi":"10.1080/17581206.2019.1575105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"different options to improve the route from the Eurostar terminal at Waterloo to Folkestone, but it was only when the multi-disciplinary consultant Ove Arup developed the idea of regenerating run-down areas east of London and in north Kent, using the Link, that progress was made, and public money became available. This convoluted process is described very well in the book. The final chapter in Part 4 is a panegyric on the conversion of St Pancras Station into the new Channel Tunnel Terminal in London; a conversion with which Nicholas Faith is obviously in full sympathy. The book does contain some faults. The author has a habit of quoting persons or organisations, usually by name, without explaining who they are and what relevance they have to the whole picture. It is also peppered with unexplained acronyms which, with the myriad of organisations involved in the project, are often difficult to interpret. The book’s illustrations are all collected into eight pages in the centre and are mainly portraits of personalities or pictures of Eurostar trains. There is only one diagram whereas the nature of the subject, especially tunnel routes and the layout of terminals, would, in many cases, be better explained by simple line drawings rather than the extensive explanations in the text. There are also numerous glaring typographical errors throughout the book which should have been edited out. It gives the distinct impression of having been completed and published in a hurry. There is, however, an excellent index and a good bibliography. Although this is obviously a book by an investigative journalist in its style and content, it does provide a valuable insight into the difficulties that were encountered in this multi-disciplinary and international infrastructure project. The extent of the research carried out by the author is very impressive and his technical descriptions of tunnelling and railway engineering are largely accurate and well adapted for a lay readership. On the political and financial aspects the ‘gentleman mischief maker’ has also stirred up a few contentious points which will no doubt provide interest for future scholars studying this major project as part of our recent history.","PeriodicalId":236677,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology","volume":"327 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"England’s Railway Heritage from the Air\",\"authors\":\"D. Gwyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581206.2019.1575105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"different options to improve the route from the Eurostar terminal at Waterloo to Folkestone, but it was only when the multi-disciplinary consultant Ove Arup developed the idea of regenerating run-down areas east of London and in north Kent, using the Link, that progress was made, and public money became available. This convoluted process is described very well in the book. The final chapter in Part 4 is a panegyric on the conversion of St Pancras Station into the new Channel Tunnel Terminal in London; a conversion with which Nicholas Faith is obviously in full sympathy. The book does contain some faults. The author has a habit of quoting persons or organisations, usually by name, without explaining who they are and what relevance they have to the whole picture. It is also peppered with unexplained acronyms which, with the myriad of organisations involved in the project, are often difficult to interpret. The book’s illustrations are all collected into eight pages in the centre and are mainly portraits of personalities or pictures of Eurostar trains. There is only one diagram whereas the nature of the subject, especially tunnel routes and the layout of terminals, would, in many cases, be better explained by simple line drawings rather than the extensive explanations in the text. There are also numerous glaring typographical errors throughout the book which should have been edited out. It gives the distinct impression of having been completed and published in a hurry. There is, however, an excellent index and a good bibliography. Although this is obviously a book by an investigative journalist in its style and content, it does provide a valuable insight into the difficulties that were encountered in this multi-disciplinary and international infrastructure project. The extent of the research carried out by the author is very impressive and his technical descriptions of tunnelling and railway engineering are largely accurate and well adapted for a lay readership. On the political and financial aspects the ‘gentleman mischief maker’ has also stirred up a few contentious points which will no doubt provide interest for future scholars studying this major project as part of our recent history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology\",\"volume\":\"327 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581206.2019.1575105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581206.2019.1575105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从滑铁卢到福克斯顿的欧洲之星终点站有不同的改进方案,但直到多学科咨询公司奥雅纳(Ove Arup)提出了利用Link改造伦敦东部和肯特北部的破旧地区的想法,才取得了进展,公共资金也到位了。这本书对这个复杂的过程描述得很好。第四部分的最后一章是对伦敦圣潘克拉斯站改建为新海峡隧道终点站的赞歌;尼古拉斯·费思显然完全赞同这种转变。这本书确实有一些错误。作者习惯引用人物或组织,通常是指名道姓,而不解释他们是谁,以及他们与整个画面有什么关联。它还充斥着无法解释的缩写词,由于项目涉及的组织众多,这些缩写词通常很难解释。这本书的插图全部集中在中间的8页,主要是人物肖像或欧洲之星列车的图片。只有一张图表,而主题的性质,特别是隧道路线和终点站的布局,在许多情况下,用简单的线条图来解释比在文本中进行广泛的解释更好。这本书中还有许多明显的印刷错误,这些错误本应被删去。它给人一种匆忙完成和出版的明显印象。然而,有一个很好的索引和一个很好的参考书目。虽然从风格和内容上看,这显然是一本调查记者写的书,但它确实对这个多学科和国际基础设施项目遇到的困难提供了有价值的见解。作者所进行的研究范围令人印象深刻,他对隧道和铁路工程的技术描述在很大程度上是准确的,并且很好地适应了外行读者。在政治和金融方面,“绅士恶作剧者”也激起了一些有争议的观点,毫无疑问,这将为未来的学者研究这一重大项目提供兴趣,作为我们近代史的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
England’s Railway Heritage from the Air
different options to improve the route from the Eurostar terminal at Waterloo to Folkestone, but it was only when the multi-disciplinary consultant Ove Arup developed the idea of regenerating run-down areas east of London and in north Kent, using the Link, that progress was made, and public money became available. This convoluted process is described very well in the book. The final chapter in Part 4 is a panegyric on the conversion of St Pancras Station into the new Channel Tunnel Terminal in London; a conversion with which Nicholas Faith is obviously in full sympathy. The book does contain some faults. The author has a habit of quoting persons or organisations, usually by name, without explaining who they are and what relevance they have to the whole picture. It is also peppered with unexplained acronyms which, with the myriad of organisations involved in the project, are often difficult to interpret. The book’s illustrations are all collected into eight pages in the centre and are mainly portraits of personalities or pictures of Eurostar trains. There is only one diagram whereas the nature of the subject, especially tunnel routes and the layout of terminals, would, in many cases, be better explained by simple line drawings rather than the extensive explanations in the text. There are also numerous glaring typographical errors throughout the book which should have been edited out. It gives the distinct impression of having been completed and published in a hurry. There is, however, an excellent index and a good bibliography. Although this is obviously a book by an investigative journalist in its style and content, it does provide a valuable insight into the difficulties that were encountered in this multi-disciplinary and international infrastructure project. The extent of the research carried out by the author is very impressive and his technical descriptions of tunnelling and railway engineering are largely accurate and well adapted for a lay readership. On the political and financial aspects the ‘gentleman mischief maker’ has also stirred up a few contentious points which will no doubt provide interest for future scholars studying this major project as part of our recent history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信