{"title":"对高等教育机构学术人员的研究活动进行评级,以确保研究成果的透明度","authors":"Valeriia Smirnova","doi":"10.28925/2414-0325.2022.1311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key aspect of increasing the level of competitiveness of a higher education institution is participation in international and domestic ratings, therefore it is important to ensure quality and open, transparent presentation of the results of all types of educational activities of a higher education institution, especially research. The development and implementation of internal ratings, the methodology of which reflects the methodology of key educational ratings, is important for the analysis of the dynamics of indicators of a higher education institution. The article analyzes the most common scientometric databases used to evaluate the results of scientific research – Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Dimensions. The experience of Ukrainian universities in building ratings of scientists based on indicators of the effectiveness of research activity in scientometric databases is analyzed. Transparency rating based on citation rates in Google Scholar, implemented at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, is presented. The transparency rating ranks higher education institutions academic staff according to the indicators of publication activity in the Google Scholar system. The advantages and disadvantages of implementing a rating system for the analysis of the research activity of higher education institutions academic staff have been determined. It is summarized that for the optimal presentation of the results of the research activities of the higher education institutions academic staff, it is important to systematically implement measures to ensure open access to research results, the use of international identifiers of the scientist, the dissemination and distribution of research results on the Internet, filling and updating the profiles of the scientist in the most authoritative scientometric databases, which has a positive effect on the indicators of the research activity of the higher education institution in the educational rankings.","PeriodicalId":145377,"journal":{"name":"OPEN EDUCATIONAL E-ENVIRONMENT OF MODERN UNIVERSITY","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RATING OF THE RESEARCH ACTIVITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ACADEMIC STAFF AS A TOOL FOR ENSURING THE TRANSPARENCY OF RESEARCH RESULTS\",\"authors\":\"Valeriia Smirnova\",\"doi\":\"10.28925/2414-0325.2022.1311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A key aspect of increasing the level of competitiveness of a higher education institution is participation in international and domestic ratings, therefore it is important to ensure quality and open, transparent presentation of the results of all types of educational activities of a higher education institution, especially research. The development and implementation of internal ratings, the methodology of which reflects the methodology of key educational ratings, is important for the analysis of the dynamics of indicators of a higher education institution. The article analyzes the most common scientometric databases used to evaluate the results of scientific research – Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Dimensions. The experience of Ukrainian universities in building ratings of scientists based on indicators of the effectiveness of research activity in scientometric databases is analyzed. Transparency rating based on citation rates in Google Scholar, implemented at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, is presented. The transparency rating ranks higher education institutions academic staff according to the indicators of publication activity in the Google Scholar system. The advantages and disadvantages of implementing a rating system for the analysis of the research activity of higher education institutions academic staff have been determined. It is summarized that for the optimal presentation of the results of the research activities of the higher education institutions academic staff, it is important to systematically implement measures to ensure open access to research results, the use of international identifiers of the scientist, the dissemination and distribution of research results on the Internet, filling and updating the profiles of the scientist in the most authoritative scientometric databases, which has a positive effect on the indicators of the research activity of the higher education institution in the educational rankings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OPEN EDUCATIONAL E-ENVIRONMENT OF MODERN UNIVERSITY\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OPEN EDUCATIONAL E-ENVIRONMENT OF MODERN UNIVERSITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2022.1311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OPEN EDUCATIONAL E-ENVIRONMENT OF MODERN UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2022.1311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
提高高等教育机构竞争力水平的一个关键方面是参与国际和国内评级,因此确保高等教育机构所有类型的教育活动,特别是研究活动的结果的质量和公开、透明的呈现是很重要的。内部评级的制定和实施,其方法反映了关键教育评级的方法,对于分析高等教育机构指标的动态非常重要。本文分析了用于评估科学研究结果的最常见的科学计量数据库- Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Dimensions。本文分析了乌克兰大学根据科学计量数据库中研究活动的有效性指标建立科学家评级的经验。基于引用率的透明度评级在谷歌学术,在鲍里斯格林琴科基辅大学实施,提出。透明度评级根据谷歌学术系统中的出版活动指标对高等教育机构的学术人员进行排名。在高等教育机构学术人员的研究活动分析中实施评级制度的利弊已经确定。本文认为,为使高等院校学术人员的科研成果得到最优的展示,必须系统地实施措施,确保科研成果的开放获取、科学家的国际标识符的使用、研究成果在互联网上的传播和分发、在最权威的科学计量数据库中填写和更新科学家的个人资料。这对高等教育机构在教育排名中的研究活动指标产生了积极的影响。
RATING OF THE RESEARCH ACTIVITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ACADEMIC STAFF AS A TOOL FOR ENSURING THE TRANSPARENCY OF RESEARCH RESULTS
A key aspect of increasing the level of competitiveness of a higher education institution is participation in international and domestic ratings, therefore it is important to ensure quality and open, transparent presentation of the results of all types of educational activities of a higher education institution, especially research. The development and implementation of internal ratings, the methodology of which reflects the methodology of key educational ratings, is important for the analysis of the dynamics of indicators of a higher education institution. The article analyzes the most common scientometric databases used to evaluate the results of scientific research – Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Dimensions. The experience of Ukrainian universities in building ratings of scientists based on indicators of the effectiveness of research activity in scientometric databases is analyzed. Transparency rating based on citation rates in Google Scholar, implemented at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, is presented. The transparency rating ranks higher education institutions academic staff according to the indicators of publication activity in the Google Scholar system. The advantages and disadvantages of implementing a rating system for the analysis of the research activity of higher education institutions academic staff have been determined. It is summarized that for the optimal presentation of the results of the research activities of the higher education institutions academic staff, it is important to systematically implement measures to ensure open access to research results, the use of international identifiers of the scientist, the dissemination and distribution of research results on the Internet, filling and updating the profiles of the scientist in the most authoritative scientometric databases, which has a positive effect on the indicators of the research activity of the higher education institution in the educational rankings.