视频压缩的三点搜索算法

Z. Cai, V. Tran, A. Bradley
{"title":"视频压缩的三点搜索算法","authors":"Z. Cai, V. Tran, A. Bradley","doi":"10.1109/ISSPA.1996.615696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the analysis of motion directions, a new search algorithm called Three-Point Search (TPS) is proposed. The main advantages of this method are as follows: 1) searching accuracy of TPS is very close to that of the full search (FS) algorithm that results in optimal matching results; 2) computational complexity is far less than that of FS. For a maximum motion displacement of w pelslframe, this approach needs 5+3w computations to locate the best match. The average computations is far less than 5+3w because a halfway-stop search technique is used. The simulations showed that the average difference in peak signal-to-noise ratio between FS and TPS is around 0.18 dB to the known CIF video sequences.","PeriodicalId":359344,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-Point Search Algorithm for Video Compression\",\"authors\":\"Z. Cai, V. Tran, A. Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSPA.1996.615696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the analysis of motion directions, a new search algorithm called Three-Point Search (TPS) is proposed. The main advantages of this method are as follows: 1) searching accuracy of TPS is very close to that of the full search (FS) algorithm that results in optimal matching results; 2) computational complexity is far less than that of FS. For a maximum motion displacement of w pelslframe, this approach needs 5+3w computations to locate the best match. The average computations is far less than 5+3w because a halfway-stop search technique is used. The simulations showed that the average difference in peak signal-to-noise ratio between FS and TPS is around 0.18 dB to the known CIF video sequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fourth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fourth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPA.1996.615696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPA.1996.615696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在分析运动方向的基础上,提出了一种新的搜索算法——三点搜索算法。该方法的主要优点是:1)TPS算法的搜索精度与全搜索(FS)算法非常接近,可以得到最优的匹配结果;2)计算复杂度远低于FS。对于最大运动位移为w个pelslframe,该方法需要5+3w的计算才能找到最佳匹配。由于使用了中途停止搜索技术,平均计算量远小于5+3w。仿真结果表明,与已知CIF视频序列相比,FS和TPS的峰值信噪比平均差约为0.18 dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three-Point Search Algorithm for Video Compression
Based on the analysis of motion directions, a new search algorithm called Three-Point Search (TPS) is proposed. The main advantages of this method are as follows: 1) searching accuracy of TPS is very close to that of the full search (FS) algorithm that results in optimal matching results; 2) computational complexity is far less than that of FS. For a maximum motion displacement of w pelslframe, this approach needs 5+3w computations to locate the best match. The average computations is far less than 5+3w because a halfway-stop search technique is used. The simulations showed that the average difference in peak signal-to-noise ratio between FS and TPS is around 0.18 dB to the known CIF video sequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信