新的lenvatinib和pembrolizumab联合治疗转移性肾细胞癌的一线药物治疗:比较有效性和安全性

B. Alekseev, I. Shevchuk
{"title":"新的lenvatinib和pembrolizumab联合治疗转移性肾细胞癌的一线药物治疗:比较有效性和安全性","authors":"B. Alekseev, I. Shevchuk","doi":"10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-3-51-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, combination immunotarget therapy is the treatment standard for patients with disseminated carcinoma of the renal parenchyma. Simultaneous inhibition of immune checkpoints of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 and VEGF/VEGFR signal transduction showed synergistic antitumor effect both in preclinical models and clinical practice.The article presents the results of phase III CLEAR (NCT02811861) trial.In the phase III CLEAR (NCT02811861) trial, 1069 patients with renal cell carcinoma with clear-cell component who previously did not receive systemic antitumor therapy were randomized 1:1:1 in groups of lenvatinib (20 mg/day per os) + pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once in 21 days), combination lenvatinib (18 mg/day per os) + everolimus (5 mg/day per os), and sunitinib (50 mg/day per os for 4 weeks with 2-week interval). The groups included 355, 357, and 357 patients respectively. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) controlled by expertise of an independent central committee per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1). Additionally, patient overall survival (OS) and drug therapy tolerability were evaluated.Median PFS for lenvatinib with pembrolizumab was significantly higher than for sunitinib (23.9 months vs. 9.2 months; progression hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.32–0.49; p <0.001). Similar advantage in PFS was observed for lenvatinib with everolimus compared to sunitinib (median PFS 14.7 months vs. 9.2 months; HR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.53–0.8; p <0.001). OS also was higher for lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination compared to sunitinib (death HR 0.66; 95 % CI 0.49–0.88; p = 0.005). No advantages in OS of lenvatinib and everolimus compared to sunitinib were detected (death HR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.88–1.5; p = 0.3). Frequency of grade III and higher adverse events among patients receiving lenvatinib + pembrolizumab, lenvatinib + everolimus, and sunitinib were 82.4, 83.1, and 71.8 %, respectively.Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib combination showed high effectiveness in 1st line treatment of renal cell carcinoma compared to sunitinib per PFS and OS values.","PeriodicalId":216890,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Urology","volume":"8 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in 1st line drug treatment: comparative effectiveness and safety\",\"authors\":\"B. Alekseev, I. Shevchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-3-51-59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, combination immunotarget therapy is the treatment standard for patients with disseminated carcinoma of the renal parenchyma. Simultaneous inhibition of immune checkpoints of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 and VEGF/VEGFR signal transduction showed synergistic antitumor effect both in preclinical models and clinical practice.The article presents the results of phase III CLEAR (NCT02811861) trial.In the phase III CLEAR (NCT02811861) trial, 1069 patients with renal cell carcinoma with clear-cell component who previously did not receive systemic antitumor therapy were randomized 1:1:1 in groups of lenvatinib (20 mg/day per os) + pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once in 21 days), combination lenvatinib (18 mg/day per os) + everolimus (5 mg/day per os), and sunitinib (50 mg/day per os for 4 weeks with 2-week interval). The groups included 355, 357, and 357 patients respectively. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) controlled by expertise of an independent central committee per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1). Additionally, patient overall survival (OS) and drug therapy tolerability were evaluated.Median PFS for lenvatinib with pembrolizumab was significantly higher than for sunitinib (23.9 months vs. 9.2 months; progression hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.32–0.49; p <0.001). Similar advantage in PFS was observed for lenvatinib with everolimus compared to sunitinib (median PFS 14.7 months vs. 9.2 months; HR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.53–0.8; p <0.001). OS also was higher for lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination compared to sunitinib (death HR 0.66; 95 % CI 0.49–0.88; p = 0.005). No advantages in OS of lenvatinib and everolimus compared to sunitinib were detected (death HR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.88–1.5; p = 0.3). Frequency of grade III and higher adverse events among patients receiving lenvatinib + pembrolizumab, lenvatinib + everolimus, and sunitinib were 82.4, 83.1, and 71.8 %, respectively.Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib combination showed high effectiveness in 1st line treatment of renal cell carcinoma compared to sunitinib per PFS and OS values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":216890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Urology\",\"volume\":\"8 10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-3-51-59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-3-51-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前,联合免疫靶向治疗是弥散性肾实质癌的治疗标准。同时抑制程序性细胞死亡1 (PD-1)/PD-L1和VEGF/VEGFR信号转导的免疫检查点在临床前模型和临床实践中均显示出协同抗肿瘤作用。本文介绍了CLEAR (NCT02811861) III期临床试验的结果。在III期CLEAR (NCT02811861)试验中,1069例既往未接受全身性抗肿瘤治疗的肾细胞癌透明细胞成分患者以1:1:1的比例随机分为lenvatinib (20 mg/天/ s) + pembrolizumab (200 mg静脉注射,21天一次)、lenvatinib (18 mg/天/ s) +依维莫司(5 mg/天/ s)和舒尼替尼(50 mg/天/ s, 4周,间隔2周)组。两组患者分别为355例、357例和357例。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),由一个独立的中央委员会的专家根据实体肿瘤反应评估标准1.1版(RECIST v.1.1)控制。此外,还评估了患者的总生存期(OS)和药物治疗耐受性。lenvatinib联合pembrolizumab的中位PFS显著高于舒尼替尼(23.9个月vs 9.2个月;进展风险比(HR) 0.39;95%置信区间(CI) 0.32-0.49;p < 0.001)。与舒尼替尼相比,依维莫司联合lenvatinib在PFS方面也有类似的优势(中位PFS 14.7个月vs 9.2个月;人力资源0.65;95% ci 0.53-0.8;p < 0.001)。与舒尼替尼相比,lenvatinib和pembrolizumab联合使用的OS也更高(死亡HR 0.66;95% ci 0.49-0.88;P = 0.005)。与舒尼替尼相比,lenvatinib和依维莫司在OS方面没有优势(死亡HR 1.15;95% ci 0.88-1.5;P = 0.3)。lenvatinib + pembrolizumab、lenvatinib +依维莫司和舒尼替尼组III级及以上不良事件发生率分别为82.4%、83.1%和71.8%。与舒尼替尼相比,派姆单抗+ lenvatinib联合治疗肾细胞癌在一线治疗中显示出更高的PFS和OS值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in 1st line drug treatment: comparative effectiveness and safety
Currently, combination immunotarget therapy is the treatment standard for patients with disseminated carcinoma of the renal parenchyma. Simultaneous inhibition of immune checkpoints of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 and VEGF/VEGFR signal transduction showed synergistic antitumor effect both in preclinical models and clinical practice.The article presents the results of phase III CLEAR (NCT02811861) trial.In the phase III CLEAR (NCT02811861) trial, 1069 patients with renal cell carcinoma with clear-cell component who previously did not receive systemic antitumor therapy were randomized 1:1:1 in groups of lenvatinib (20 mg/day per os) + pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once in 21 days), combination lenvatinib (18 mg/day per os) + everolimus (5 mg/day per os), and sunitinib (50 mg/day per os for 4 weeks with 2-week interval). The groups included 355, 357, and 357 patients respectively. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) controlled by expertise of an independent central committee per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1). Additionally, patient overall survival (OS) and drug therapy tolerability were evaluated.Median PFS for lenvatinib with pembrolizumab was significantly higher than for sunitinib (23.9 months vs. 9.2 months; progression hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.32–0.49; p <0.001). Similar advantage in PFS was observed for lenvatinib with everolimus compared to sunitinib (median PFS 14.7 months vs. 9.2 months; HR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.53–0.8; p <0.001). OS also was higher for lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination compared to sunitinib (death HR 0.66; 95 % CI 0.49–0.88; p = 0.005). No advantages in OS of lenvatinib and everolimus compared to sunitinib were detected (death HR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.88–1.5; p = 0.3). Frequency of grade III and higher adverse events among patients receiving lenvatinib + pembrolizumab, lenvatinib + everolimus, and sunitinib were 82.4, 83.1, and 71.8 %, respectively.Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib combination showed high effectiveness in 1st line treatment of renal cell carcinoma compared to sunitinib per PFS and OS values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信