V. Colón-López, Camille Vélez-Álamo, Adrianna I Acevedo-Fontánez, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Y. Serra-Martínez, Ileska M. Valencia-Torres, Maria E Fernandez
{"title":"摘要B24: Salud!这是一项旨在增加波多黎各人结肠直肠癌筛查的教育干预措施","authors":"V. Colón-López, Camille Vélez-Álamo, Adrianna I Acevedo-Fontánez, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Y. Serra-Martínez, Ileska M. Valencia-Torres, Maria E Fernandez","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the second highest incidence in both men and women in Puerto Rico (PR). This cancer is the leading cause of death in PR. Although largely preventable through screening and treatment of precancerous polyps, colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) using fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy remains low for adults in PR. Data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicate that only 18.5% of the PR population 50+ years has undergone an FOBT within the past two years compared to 12.8% in the United States of America (USA). Additionally, only 50.6% of age-eligible Puerto Ricans report ever having a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy compared to 68.8% in the USA. Therefore, given the higher burden of CRC and the low CRCS rates in the island, we developed iSalud!, por la Vida (SLPV), an educational program that aims to increase CRCS in nonadherent men and women 50 years and older who attend Federally Qualified Health Clinics (FQHCs) in PR. Methods: Intervention mapping (IM) was used as the guiding framework to develop an educational intervention that is theoretically sound and grounded in evidence. For the development of SPLV, steps 1 to 4 of IM were completed: step 1: a needs assessment conducted through focus groups and face-to-face interviews with patients, medical directors, and other key informants from the FQHCs to gather quantitative and qualitative data for the development of the logic model and the program; step 2: development of a logic model of change and matrices of change objectives; step 3: selection of theory and evidence-based methods and strategies; and step 4: program production, components, and materials of a CRCS patient-education intervention. Results: The needs assessment (step 1) data revealed five main themes: (1) limited knowledge about CRC and CRCS practices; (2) patients9 fear of the CRC test results; (3) low risk perception of CRC; (4) reporting not having received a provider recommendation regarding the screening test; and (5) the importance of social support in making the decision of getting screened for CRC. Key informant interviews showed that the vast majority of the clinics offer FOBT as part of the CRCS protocol, with 74.0% of these having a clinical laboratory at their facilities. Over one half (53.0%) had already implemented electronic medical records (EMR) and 82.0% had health educators as part of their full-time staff. A logic model was developed by combining personal behaviors with behavioral determinants and identifying beliefs targeted by the intervention (step 2). Tailored interactive multimedia intervention (TIMI) and small media were selected as the practical application to deliver the intervention (step 3). Development of the program included 5 components: (1) script development for fictional videos; (2) testimonials; (3) animations; (4) written materials; and (5) newsletter. After all five components were developed, the team completed a pretesting to evaluate the usability of the program. Pretesting assessment conducted with 9 participants showed that the program was easy to use and that they understood the commands of the interactive platform. Conclusion: Our educational program, !Salud!, por la Vida is completed and currently in implementation phase, using a randomized trial. This trial will be conducted in 10 FQHCs and is expected to recruit 710 participants between the ages of 50-75 who have no prior history of CRC and who are not adherent to CRCS guidelines. The randomization of this study is at the clinic level, in which we randomly allocated each clinic to either the intervention group (TIMI) or the control group (usual care). We aim for this intervention to significantly increase CRCS rates and provide evidence to disseminate this educational effort to FQHCs island wide. Note: This abstract was not presented at the conference. Citation Format: Vivian Colon-Lopez, Camille Velez-Alamo, Adrianna Acevedo-Fontanez, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Yolanda Serra-Martinez, Ileska Valencia-Torres, Maria E. Fernandez. Salud!, por la Vida, an educational intervention to increasing colorectal cancer screening in Puerto Ricans [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B24.","PeriodicalId":254061,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract B24: Salud!, por la Vida, an educational intervention to increasing colorectal cancer screening in Puerto Ricans\",\"authors\":\"V. Colón-López, Camille Vélez-Álamo, Adrianna I Acevedo-Fontánez, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Y. Serra-Martínez, Ileska M. Valencia-Torres, Maria E Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the second highest incidence in both men and women in Puerto Rico (PR). This cancer is the leading cause of death in PR. Although largely preventable through screening and treatment of precancerous polyps, colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) using fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy remains low for adults in PR. Data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicate that only 18.5% of the PR population 50+ years has undergone an FOBT within the past two years compared to 12.8% in the United States of America (USA). Additionally, only 50.6% of age-eligible Puerto Ricans report ever having a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy compared to 68.8% in the USA. Therefore, given the higher burden of CRC and the low CRCS rates in the island, we developed iSalud!, por la Vida (SLPV), an educational program that aims to increase CRCS in nonadherent men and women 50 years and older who attend Federally Qualified Health Clinics (FQHCs) in PR. Methods: Intervention mapping (IM) was used as the guiding framework to develop an educational intervention that is theoretically sound and grounded in evidence. For the development of SPLV, steps 1 to 4 of IM were completed: step 1: a needs assessment conducted through focus groups and face-to-face interviews with patients, medical directors, and other key informants from the FQHCs to gather quantitative and qualitative data for the development of the logic model and the program; step 2: development of a logic model of change and matrices of change objectives; step 3: selection of theory and evidence-based methods and strategies; and step 4: program production, components, and materials of a CRCS patient-education intervention. Results: The needs assessment (step 1) data revealed five main themes: (1) limited knowledge about CRC and CRCS practices; (2) patients9 fear of the CRC test results; (3) low risk perception of CRC; (4) reporting not having received a provider recommendation regarding the screening test; and (5) the importance of social support in making the decision of getting screened for CRC. Key informant interviews showed that the vast majority of the clinics offer FOBT as part of the CRCS protocol, with 74.0% of these having a clinical laboratory at their facilities. Over one half (53.0%) had already implemented electronic medical records (EMR) and 82.0% had health educators as part of their full-time staff. A logic model was developed by combining personal behaviors with behavioral determinants and identifying beliefs targeted by the intervention (step 2). Tailored interactive multimedia intervention (TIMI) and small media were selected as the practical application to deliver the intervention (step 3). Development of the program included 5 components: (1) script development for fictional videos; (2) testimonials; (3) animations; (4) written materials; and (5) newsletter. After all five components were developed, the team completed a pretesting to evaluate the usability of the program. Pretesting assessment conducted with 9 participants showed that the program was easy to use and that they understood the commands of the interactive platform. Conclusion: Our educational program, !Salud!, por la Vida is completed and currently in implementation phase, using a randomized trial. This trial will be conducted in 10 FQHCs and is expected to recruit 710 participants between the ages of 50-75 who have no prior history of CRC and who are not adherent to CRCS guidelines. The randomization of this study is at the clinic level, in which we randomly allocated each clinic to either the intervention group (TIMI) or the control group (usual care). We aim for this intervention to significantly increase CRCS rates and provide evidence to disseminate this educational effort to FQHCs island wide. Note: This abstract was not presented at the conference. Citation Format: Vivian Colon-Lopez, Camille Velez-Alamo, Adrianna Acevedo-Fontanez, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Yolanda Serra-Martinez, Ileska Valencia-Torres, Maria E. Fernandez. Salud!, por la Vida, an educational intervention to increasing colorectal cancer screening in Puerto Ricans [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B24.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:结直肠癌(CRC)是波多黎各(PR)男性和女性发病率第二高的疾病。这种癌症是PR死亡的主要原因。尽管通过筛查和治疗癌前息肉在很大程度上可以预防,但PR成人使用粪便隐血试验(FOBT)、乙状结肠镜或结肠镜进行结肠直肠癌筛查(CRCS)的比例仍然很低。2014年行为风险因素监测系统的数据显示,在过去两年中,50岁以上的PR人群中只有18.5%进行过FOBT,而美国(USA)的这一比例为12.8%。此外,只有50.6%的符合年龄条件的波多黎各人报告曾做过乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查,而美国的这一比例为68.8%。因此,考虑到岛上较高的CRC负担和较低的CRC发生率,我们开发了iSalud!在美国,穷人生活(SLPV)是一项教育计划,旨在提高50岁及以上在PR联邦合格健康诊所(fqhc)就诊的非坚持治疗的男性和女性的CRCS。方法:干预映射(IM)被用作指导框架,以开发理论上合理且基于证据的教育干预。为了开发SPLV,已完成了IM的第1至4步:第1步:通过焦点小组和与FQHCs的患者、医疗主任和其他关键线人的面对面访谈进行需求评估,以收集定量和定性数据,以开发逻辑模型和方案;步骤2:开发变更的逻辑模型和变更目标矩阵;第三步:选择理论和循证方法与策略;第四步:CRCS患者教育干预的程序制作、组件和材料。结果:需求评估(步骤1)数据揭示了五个主要主题:(1)对CRC和CRC实践的认识有限;(2)患者对CRC检查结果的恐惧;(3) CRC风险认知低;(四)报告未收到提供者关于筛查试验的建议的;(5)社会支持在决定是否接受结直肠癌筛查中的重要性。关键信息提供者访谈显示,绝大多数诊所提供FOBT作为CRCS方案的一部分,其中74.0%的诊所在其设施中设有临床实验室。超过一半(53.0%)的医院已经实施了电子病历(EMR), 82.0%的医院的全职员工中有健康教育工作者。通过将个人行为与行为决定因素结合起来,并确定干预目标的信念,建立了一个逻辑模型(步骤2)。选择定制交互式多媒体干预(TIMI)和小媒体作为提供干预的实际应用(步骤3)。该计划的开发包括5个组成部分:(1)虚构视频的脚本开发;(2)推荐;(3)动画;(四)书面材料;(5)通讯。在开发了所有五个组件之后,团队完成了预测试,以评估程序的可用性。对9名参与者进行的预测试评估表明,该程序易于使用,并且他们理解交互平台的命令。总结:我们的教育计划,干杯!在美国,穷人生活已经完成,目前正处于实施阶段,采用一项随机试验。该试验将在10个fqhc中进行,预计将招募710名年龄在50-75岁之间、无CRC病史且不遵守CRC指南的参与者。本研究的随机化是在诊所水平,我们将每个诊所随机分配到干预组(TIMI)或对照组(常规护理)。我们的目标是这一干预措施显著提高CRCS率,并提供证据,将这一教育工作推广到全岛的fqhc。注:本摘要未在会议上发表。引文格式:Vivian Colon-Lopez, Camille Velez-Alamo, Adrianna Acevedo-Fontanez, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Yolanda Serra-Martinez, Ileska Valencia-Torres, Maria E. Fernandez祝您健康!, por la Vida,一项增加波多黎各人结直肠癌筛查的教育干预[摘要]。见:第十届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2017年9月25-28日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2018;27(7增刊):摘要nr B24。
Abstract B24: Salud!, por la Vida, an educational intervention to increasing colorectal cancer screening in Puerto Ricans
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the second highest incidence in both men and women in Puerto Rico (PR). This cancer is the leading cause of death in PR. Although largely preventable through screening and treatment of precancerous polyps, colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) using fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy remains low for adults in PR. Data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System indicate that only 18.5% of the PR population 50+ years has undergone an FOBT within the past two years compared to 12.8% in the United States of America (USA). Additionally, only 50.6% of age-eligible Puerto Ricans report ever having a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy compared to 68.8% in the USA. Therefore, given the higher burden of CRC and the low CRCS rates in the island, we developed iSalud!, por la Vida (SLPV), an educational program that aims to increase CRCS in nonadherent men and women 50 years and older who attend Federally Qualified Health Clinics (FQHCs) in PR. Methods: Intervention mapping (IM) was used as the guiding framework to develop an educational intervention that is theoretically sound and grounded in evidence. For the development of SPLV, steps 1 to 4 of IM were completed: step 1: a needs assessment conducted through focus groups and face-to-face interviews with patients, medical directors, and other key informants from the FQHCs to gather quantitative and qualitative data for the development of the logic model and the program; step 2: development of a logic model of change and matrices of change objectives; step 3: selection of theory and evidence-based methods and strategies; and step 4: program production, components, and materials of a CRCS patient-education intervention. Results: The needs assessment (step 1) data revealed five main themes: (1) limited knowledge about CRC and CRCS practices; (2) patients9 fear of the CRC test results; (3) low risk perception of CRC; (4) reporting not having received a provider recommendation regarding the screening test; and (5) the importance of social support in making the decision of getting screened for CRC. Key informant interviews showed that the vast majority of the clinics offer FOBT as part of the CRCS protocol, with 74.0% of these having a clinical laboratory at their facilities. Over one half (53.0%) had already implemented electronic medical records (EMR) and 82.0% had health educators as part of their full-time staff. A logic model was developed by combining personal behaviors with behavioral determinants and identifying beliefs targeted by the intervention (step 2). Tailored interactive multimedia intervention (TIMI) and small media were selected as the practical application to deliver the intervention (step 3). Development of the program included 5 components: (1) script development for fictional videos; (2) testimonials; (3) animations; (4) written materials; and (5) newsletter. After all five components were developed, the team completed a pretesting to evaluate the usability of the program. Pretesting assessment conducted with 9 participants showed that the program was easy to use and that they understood the commands of the interactive platform. Conclusion: Our educational program, !Salud!, por la Vida is completed and currently in implementation phase, using a randomized trial. This trial will be conducted in 10 FQHCs and is expected to recruit 710 participants between the ages of 50-75 who have no prior history of CRC and who are not adherent to CRCS guidelines. The randomization of this study is at the clinic level, in which we randomly allocated each clinic to either the intervention group (TIMI) or the control group (usual care). We aim for this intervention to significantly increase CRCS rates and provide evidence to disseminate this educational effort to FQHCs island wide. Note: This abstract was not presented at the conference. Citation Format: Vivian Colon-Lopez, Camille Velez-Alamo, Adrianna Acevedo-Fontanez, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Yolanda Serra-Martinez, Ileska Valencia-Torres, Maria E. Fernandez. Salud!, por la Vida, an educational intervention to increasing colorectal cancer screening in Puerto Ricans [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B24.