全球公民教育作为一种追求社会正义的鲜活伦理哲学

Emiliano Bosio, Y. Waghid
{"title":"全球公民教育作为一种追求社会正义的鲜活伦理哲学","authors":"Emiliano Bosio, Y. Waghid","doi":"10.1386/ctl_00117_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Envisioning a global citizenship education (GCE) that critically engages with neo-liberalism could be considered as being ‘feasibly utopian’. Yet, one of the core challenges facing GCE is that the market has been given too dominant position by the hegemony of neo-liberal doctrines, which has caused a growing number of schools and universities to approach curricular matters guided by concepts of international leadership, focusing on introducing innovation to curricula to satisfy international standards, participate in the global market and enter partnerships with industry and commerce. Given the ‘dominance’ of neo-liberal doctrines, it can be complex to pose alternative positions of GCE that are more oriented towards critical pedagogy. The articles in this issue explore philosophical, ethical and pedagogical visions of GCE focused on the relationship between world politics and social justice, women’s leadership and power, reflexive dialogic praxis and critical consciousness, de-colonialism and social responsibility. In different ways, each of the articles contributes to a re-imagined vision for GCE, through the important process of rethinking GCE for the common good.","PeriodicalId":358997,"journal":{"name":"Citizenship Teaching & Learning","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global citizenship education as a living ethical philosophy for social justice\",\"authors\":\"Emiliano Bosio, Y. Waghid\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/ctl_00117_2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Envisioning a global citizenship education (GCE) that critically engages with neo-liberalism could be considered as being ‘feasibly utopian’. Yet, one of the core challenges facing GCE is that the market has been given too dominant position by the hegemony of neo-liberal doctrines, which has caused a growing number of schools and universities to approach curricular matters guided by concepts of international leadership, focusing on introducing innovation to curricula to satisfy international standards, participate in the global market and enter partnerships with industry and commerce. Given the ‘dominance’ of neo-liberal doctrines, it can be complex to pose alternative positions of GCE that are more oriented towards critical pedagogy. The articles in this issue explore philosophical, ethical and pedagogical visions of GCE focused on the relationship between world politics and social justice, women’s leadership and power, reflexive dialogic praxis and critical consciousness, de-colonialism and social responsibility. In different ways, each of the articles contributes to a re-imagined vision for GCE, through the important process of rethinking GCE for the common good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Citizenship Teaching & Learning\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Citizenship Teaching & Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00117_2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizenship Teaching & Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00117_2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

设想一种批判性地与新自由主义相结合的全球公民教育(GCE)可以被认为是“可行的乌托邦”。然而,GCE面临的核心挑战之一是,市场被新自由主义的霸权主义赋予了过于主导的地位,这导致越来越多的学校和大学在国际领导概念的指导下处理课程问题,重点是在课程中引入创新,以满足国际标准,参与全球市场,并与工业和商业建立伙伴关系。考虑到新自由主义学说的“主导地位”,提出更倾向于批判教学法的普通教育教育的替代立场可能是复杂的。本期的文章探讨了GCE的哲学、伦理和教学观点,重点关注世界政治与社会正义、妇女领导与权力、反思性对话实践与批判意识、去殖民主义与社会责任之间的关系。通过为共同利益重新思考GCE的重要过程,每一篇文章都以不同的方式为GCE的重新设想做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global citizenship education as a living ethical philosophy for social justice
Envisioning a global citizenship education (GCE) that critically engages with neo-liberalism could be considered as being ‘feasibly utopian’. Yet, one of the core challenges facing GCE is that the market has been given too dominant position by the hegemony of neo-liberal doctrines, which has caused a growing number of schools and universities to approach curricular matters guided by concepts of international leadership, focusing on introducing innovation to curricula to satisfy international standards, participate in the global market and enter partnerships with industry and commerce. Given the ‘dominance’ of neo-liberal doctrines, it can be complex to pose alternative positions of GCE that are more oriented towards critical pedagogy. The articles in this issue explore philosophical, ethical and pedagogical visions of GCE focused on the relationship between world politics and social justice, women’s leadership and power, reflexive dialogic praxis and critical consciousness, de-colonialism and social responsibility. In different ways, each of the articles contributes to a re-imagined vision for GCE, through the important process of rethinking GCE for the common good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信