{"title":"社会工会主义与人民阵线:剑桥大学教师工会,1935-1941","authors":"Nathan Godfried","doi":"10.25071/1913-9632.39635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies of university faculty unions that formed during the interwar era argue that those bodies devoted themselves to a progressive social, economic, and political agenda (social unionism), rather than immediate workplace needs (bread-and-butter unionism). The few scholarly works that mention the Cambridge Union of University Teachers (CUUT)—created in October 1935 by instructors from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology—emphasize the union’s orientation toward social issues. An affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers, the CUUT never attempted to engage in collective bargaining or to set wages, hours, or other work conditions. But a careful examination of the CUUT’s early history reveals a more complicated legacy. The men, and a few women, who led the union embraced a multifaceted agenda: to link Local 431 to the larger community, including local teachers’ unions and other area labour groups; to support a national popular front social movement; and to secure fair employment and academic freedom for all college/university teachers in Cambridge. This article describes and analyzes the CUUT’s ideology and policies during the years 1935-1941, the union’s most active period, and the obstacles that it encountered both from within its ranks and from the corporatized institutions of higher education.","PeriodicalId":143418,"journal":{"name":"Left History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Unionism and the Popular Front: The Cambridge Union of University Teachers, 1935-1941\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Godfried\",\"doi\":\"10.25071/1913-9632.39635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most studies of university faculty unions that formed during the interwar era argue that those bodies devoted themselves to a progressive social, economic, and political agenda (social unionism), rather than immediate workplace needs (bread-and-butter unionism). The few scholarly works that mention the Cambridge Union of University Teachers (CUUT)—created in October 1935 by instructors from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology—emphasize the union’s orientation toward social issues. An affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers, the CUUT never attempted to engage in collective bargaining or to set wages, hours, or other work conditions. But a careful examination of the CUUT’s early history reveals a more complicated legacy. The men, and a few women, who led the union embraced a multifaceted agenda: to link Local 431 to the larger community, including local teachers’ unions and other area labour groups; to support a national popular front social movement; and to secure fair employment and academic freedom for all college/university teachers in Cambridge. This article describes and analyzes the CUUT’s ideology and policies during the years 1935-1941, the union’s most active period, and the obstacles that it encountered both from within its ranks and from the corporatized institutions of higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Left History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Left History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25071/1913-9632.39635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Left History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1913-9632.39635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大多数关于两次世界大战期间形成的大学教师工会的研究认为,这些团体致力于进步的社会、经济和政治议程(社会工会主义),而不是直接的工作场所需求(面包和黄油工会主义)。剑桥大学教师联合会(Cambridge Union of University Teachers, CUUT)是由哈佛大学和麻省理工学院的教师于1935年10月创建的,提及该联合会的少数学术著作强调了该联合会在社会问题上的定位。作为美国教师联合会(American Federation of Teachers)的附属机构,总工会从未试图参与集体谈判或设定工资、工时或其他工作条件。但是,仔细研究中国理工大学的早期历史,就会发现它留下了更为复杂的遗产。领导工会的男性和少数女性接受了一个多方面的议程:将Local 431与更大的社区联系起来,包括当地教师工会和其他地区劳工团体;支持全国性的人民阵线社会运动;确保剑桥所有学院/大学教师的公平就业和学术自由。本文描述和分析了1935-1941年间,工会最活跃的时期,美国大学教师工会的思想和政策,以及它遇到的来自其内部和公司化高等教育机构的障碍。
Social Unionism and the Popular Front: The Cambridge Union of University Teachers, 1935-1941
Most studies of university faculty unions that formed during the interwar era argue that those bodies devoted themselves to a progressive social, economic, and political agenda (social unionism), rather than immediate workplace needs (bread-and-butter unionism). The few scholarly works that mention the Cambridge Union of University Teachers (CUUT)—created in October 1935 by instructors from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology—emphasize the union’s orientation toward social issues. An affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers, the CUUT never attempted to engage in collective bargaining or to set wages, hours, or other work conditions. But a careful examination of the CUUT’s early history reveals a more complicated legacy. The men, and a few women, who led the union embraced a multifaceted agenda: to link Local 431 to the larger community, including local teachers’ unions and other area labour groups; to support a national popular front social movement; and to secure fair employment and academic freedom for all college/university teachers in Cambridge. This article describes and analyzes the CUUT’s ideology and policies during the years 1935-1941, the union’s most active period, and the obstacles that it encountered both from within its ranks and from the corporatized institutions of higher education.