2.45 GHz频段两种天线计算SAR的设计与比较

Héctor Kaschel, Cristian Ahumada, R. Osorio-Comparán
{"title":"2.45 GHz频段两种天线计算SAR的设计与比较","authors":"Héctor Kaschel, Cristian Ahumada, R. Osorio-Comparán","doi":"10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present the design of two different antennas with a band of 2.45 GHz, and their comparison, to calculate the SAR level for the IEEE 802.15.6. The first design consists on a dipole antenna with geometrics of a half wave. The second design is that of a rectangular microstrip antenna using the feedline method. Both of the antennas are designed with the goal of them working in wireless applications. The CST Simulator tool is used to examine the main characteristics of the antennas: return loss, VWSW, gain, and radiation pattern. In this research, we evaluate and compare the SAR levels of the dipole antenna with those of the microstrip antenna. In order to evaluate the maximum SAR levels, the antenna is used in a vertical position on a homogeneous model. In order to calculate the SAR levels for the tissues, we follow the two standards that are accepted nowadays by the FCC and ICNIRP.","PeriodicalId":328922,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)","volume":"242 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and Comparison of Two Types of Antennas in the 2.45 GHz Band to Calculate the SAR\",\"authors\":\"Héctor Kaschel, Cristian Ahumada, R. Osorio-Comparán\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present the design of two different antennas with a band of 2.45 GHz, and their comparison, to calculate the SAR level for the IEEE 802.15.6. The first design consists on a dipole antenna with geometrics of a half wave. The second design is that of a rectangular microstrip antenna using the feedline method. Both of the antennas are designed with the goal of them working in wireless applications. The CST Simulator tool is used to examine the main characteristics of the antennas: return loss, VWSW, gain, and radiation pattern. In this research, we evaluate and compare the SAR levels of the dipole antenna with those of the microstrip antenna. In order to evaluate the maximum SAR levels, the antenna is used in a vertical position on a homogeneous model. In order to calculate the SAR levels for the tissues, we follow the two standards that are accepted nowadays by the FCC and ICNIRP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)\",\"volume\":\"242 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们设计了两种不同的2.45 GHz频段天线,并对它们进行了比较,以计算IEEE 802.15.6标准的SAR水平。第一种设计是采用半波几何形状的偶极天线。第二种设计是采用馈线方法的矩形微带天线。这两种天线的设计目标都是在无线应用中工作。CST模拟器工具用于检查天线的主要特性:回波损耗、VWSW、增益和辐射方向图。在本研究中,我们评估并比较了偶极子天线与微带天线的SAR水平。为了评估最大SAR水平,在均匀模型上将天线置于垂直位置。为了计算组织的SAR水平,我们遵循FCC和ICNIRP目前接受的两个标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and Comparison of Two Types of Antennas in the 2.45 GHz Band to Calculate the SAR
In this paper, we present the design of two different antennas with a band of 2.45 GHz, and their comparison, to calculate the SAR level for the IEEE 802.15.6. The first design consists on a dipole antenna with geometrics of a half wave. The second design is that of a rectangular microstrip antenna using the feedline method. Both of the antennas are designed with the goal of them working in wireless applications. The CST Simulator tool is used to examine the main characteristics of the antennas: return loss, VWSW, gain, and radiation pattern. In this research, we evaluate and compare the SAR levels of the dipole antenna with those of the microstrip antenna. In order to evaluate the maximum SAR levels, the antenna is used in a vertical position on a homogeneous model. In order to calculate the SAR levels for the tissues, we follow the two standards that are accepted nowadays by the FCC and ICNIRP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信