不要只是粘贴你的堆栈轨迹:在CS入门课程中塑造讨论论坛

Amogh Mannekote, M. Celepkolu, Aisha Chung Galdo, K. Boyer, Maya Israel, S. Heckman, Kristin Stephens-Martinez
{"title":"不要只是粘贴你的堆栈轨迹:在CS入门课程中塑造讨论论坛","authors":"Amogh Mannekote, M. Celepkolu, Aisha Chung Galdo, K. Boyer, Maya Israel, S. Heckman, Kristin Stephens-Martinez","doi":"10.1145/3478432.3499110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussion forums are invaluable resources when scaling up undergraduate CS courses to larger class sizes. However, passive incorporation of discussion forums is not a silver bullet, as these platforms tend to devolve into places of shallow engagement. To aid our understanding of the factors that influence the nature of these interactions, we collected data from three CS1/CS2 forums. We obtained survey responses from the course instructors and performed a content analysis of the question-response pairs across all the courses. The results suggest that students' help-seeking patterns are influenced by the course curriculum, mode of delivery, and the existence of other help-seeking avenues. The findings also shed light on common strategies used by instructors to incentivize productive student-teaching staff and student-student interactions (e.g., instructing students to describe their debugging questions in detail, asking teaching staff to respond with hints/questions instead of direct answers). This poster presents a series of takeaways that can inform CS educators' choices around discussion forums.","PeriodicalId":113773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Don't Just Paste Your Stacktrace: Shaping Discussion Forums in Introductory CS Courses\",\"authors\":\"Amogh Mannekote, M. Celepkolu, Aisha Chung Galdo, K. Boyer, Maya Israel, S. Heckman, Kristin Stephens-Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3478432.3499110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussion forums are invaluable resources when scaling up undergraduate CS courses to larger class sizes. However, passive incorporation of discussion forums is not a silver bullet, as these platforms tend to devolve into places of shallow engagement. To aid our understanding of the factors that influence the nature of these interactions, we collected data from three CS1/CS2 forums. We obtained survey responses from the course instructors and performed a content analysis of the question-response pairs across all the courses. The results suggest that students' help-seeking patterns are influenced by the course curriculum, mode of delivery, and the existence of other help-seeking avenues. The findings also shed light on common strategies used by instructors to incentivize productive student-teaching staff and student-student interactions (e.g., instructing students to describe their debugging questions in detail, asking teaching staff to respond with hints/questions instead of direct answers). This poster presents a series of takeaways that can inform CS educators' choices around discussion forums.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3478432.3499110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3478432.3499110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当把CS课程扩大到更大的班级规模时,论坛是非常宝贵的资源。然而,被动地整合论坛并不是什么灵丹妙药,因为这些平台往往会沦为肤浅参与的地方。为了帮助我们理解影响这些交互性质的因素,我们从三个CS1/CS2论坛收集了数据。我们从课程讲师那里获得了调查回复,并对所有课程的问题-回应对进行了内容分析。结果表明,学生的求助方式受课程设置、授课方式和其他求助途径的影响。研究结果还揭示了教师用来激励富有成效的学生-教师和学生-学生互动的常用策略(例如,指导学生详细描述他们的调试问题,要求教师用提示/问题而不是直接回答来回应)。这张海报展示了一系列的要点,可以告诉CS教育者在讨论论坛上的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Don't Just Paste Your Stacktrace: Shaping Discussion Forums in Introductory CS Courses
Discussion forums are invaluable resources when scaling up undergraduate CS courses to larger class sizes. However, passive incorporation of discussion forums is not a silver bullet, as these platforms tend to devolve into places of shallow engagement. To aid our understanding of the factors that influence the nature of these interactions, we collected data from three CS1/CS2 forums. We obtained survey responses from the course instructors and performed a content analysis of the question-response pairs across all the courses. The results suggest that students' help-seeking patterns are influenced by the course curriculum, mode of delivery, and the existence of other help-seeking avenues. The findings also shed light on common strategies used by instructors to incentivize productive student-teaching staff and student-student interactions (e.g., instructing students to describe their debugging questions in detail, asking teaching staff to respond with hints/questions instead of direct answers). This poster presents a series of takeaways that can inform CS educators' choices around discussion forums.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信