用LMS数据预测高危学生:Adaboost和LSTM算法的比较

R. Battaglin, R. Muñoz, V. Ramos, C. Cechinel
{"title":"用LMS数据预测高危学生:Adaboost和LSTM算法的比较","authors":"R. Battaglin, R. Muñoz, V. Ramos, C. Cechinel","doi":"10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prediction of students at-risk (dropout and failure) is a largely explored problem on Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining. The present work compares the results of two different algorithms used to generate predictive models to early detect students at-risk, LSTM and Adaboost. This comparison aims to improve the performances of the models already implemented and integrated on a Moodle dashboard. For the comparison, data from a total of 122 students was collected from Moodle over four semester of an Introductory Programming course offered at Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Models were generated for each one of the 17 weeks of the semester, and their AUROC measures were then calculated and compared to evaluate the differences between LSTM and Adaboost. The results have shown that even though LSTM models presented a better performance than Adaboost, these differences were not statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":111811,"journal":{"name":"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting at-risk students with LMS data: a comparison between Adaboost and LSTM algorithms\",\"authors\":\"R. Battaglin, R. Muñoz, V. Ramos, C. Cechinel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prediction of students at-risk (dropout and failure) is a largely explored problem on Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining. The present work compares the results of two different algorithms used to generate predictive models to early detect students at-risk, LSTM and Adaboost. This comparison aims to improve the performances of the models already implemented and integrated on a Moodle dashboard. For the comparison, data from a total of 122 students was collected from Moodle over four semester of an Introductory Programming course offered at Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Models were generated for each one of the 17 weeks of the semester, and their AUROC measures were then calculated and compared to evaluate the differences between LSTM and Adaboost. The results have shown that even though LSTM models presented a better performance than Adaboost, these differences were not statistically significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在学习分析和教育数据挖掘中,对有风险学生(辍学和不及格)的预测是一个被广泛探讨的问题。目前的研究比较了LSTM和Adaboost两种不同算法的结果,这两种算法用于生成预测模型,以早期发现有风险的学生。这种比较的目的是提高已经在Moodle仪表板上实现和集成的模型的性能。为了进行比较,我们从Moodle上收集了122名学生在圣卡塔琳娜联邦大学(UFSC)开设的四个学期的编程入门课程中的数据。每个学期的17周都会生成模型,然后计算并比较它们的AUROC测量值,以评估LSTM和Adaboost之间的差异。结果表明,尽管LSTM模型表现出比Adaboost更好的性能,但这些差异并不具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting at-risk students with LMS data: a comparison between Adaboost and LSTM algorithms
The prediction of students at-risk (dropout and failure) is a largely explored problem on Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining. The present work compares the results of two different algorithms used to generate predictive models to early detect students at-risk, LSTM and Adaboost. This comparison aims to improve the performances of the models already implemented and integrated on a Moodle dashboard. For the comparison, data from a total of 122 students was collected from Moodle over four semester of an Introductory Programming course offered at Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Models were generated for each one of the 17 weeks of the semester, and their AUROC measures were then calculated and compared to evaluate the differences between LSTM and Adaboost. The results have shown that even though LSTM models presented a better performance than Adaboost, these differences were not statistically significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信