{"title":"冗余电路的随机可测试性","authors":"A. Krasniewski, A. Albicki","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.1991.139936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is shown that the common belief that any optimized, i.e., nonredundant, circuit is easier to test than its nonoptimized counterpart is not fully justified. It is demonstrated by example that a redundant circuit may be more suitable for random testing than its optimized counterpart. A rule which specifies when redundancy is likely to enhance random testability of a two-level AND-OR gate network is formulated.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":239827,"journal":{"name":"[1991 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Random testability of redundant circuits\",\"authors\":\"A. Krasniewski, A. Albicki\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCD.1991.139936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is shown that the common belief that any optimized, i.e., nonredundant, circuit is easier to test than its nonoptimized counterpart is not fully justified. It is demonstrated by example that a redundant circuit may be more suitable for random testing than its optimized counterpart. A rule which specifies when redundancy is likely to enhance random testability of a two-level AND-OR gate network is formulated.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":239827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1991 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1991 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.1991.139936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1991 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.1991.139936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
It is shown that the common belief that any optimized, i.e., nonredundant, circuit is easier to test than its nonoptimized counterpart is not fully justified. It is demonstrated by example that a redundant circuit may be more suitable for random testing than its optimized counterpart. A rule which specifies when redundancy is likely to enhance random testability of a two-level AND-OR gate network is formulated.<>