{"title":"了解情绪:回复de Sousa, Beisecker和Gallegos","authors":"R. A. Furtak","doi":"10.33497/jpe.v1i1.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Beginning with de Sousa's question about how my position is related to that of \"enactive\" theorists, I spell out my emphasis on the unity of affective experience, and say more about my conception of the emotional \"a priori.\" In response to Beisecker, I elaborate by way of a literary example on how a significant fact can exist without yet having 'registered' in one's emotional awareness, and on the basis of this I reject the claim that emotions constitute significance. Finally, prompted by Gallegos, I elaborate on why, on my view,","PeriodicalId":329066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing Emotions: Replies to de Sousa, Beisecker, and Gallegos\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Furtak\",\"doi\":\"10.33497/jpe.v1i1.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Beginning with de Sousa's question about how my position is related to that of \\\"enactive\\\" theorists, I spell out my emphasis on the unity of affective experience, and say more about my conception of the emotional \\\"a priori.\\\" In response to Beisecker, I elaborate by way of a literary example on how a significant fact can exist without yet having 'registered' in one's emotional awareness, and on the basis of this I reject the claim that emotions constitute significance. Finally, prompted by Gallegos, I elaborate on why, on my view,\",\"PeriodicalId\":329066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33497/jpe.v1i1.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33497/jpe.v1i1.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowing Emotions: Replies to de Sousa, Beisecker, and Gallegos
: Beginning with de Sousa's question about how my position is related to that of "enactive" theorists, I spell out my emphasis on the unity of affective experience, and say more about my conception of the emotional "a priori." In response to Beisecker, I elaborate by way of a literary example on how a significant fact can exist without yet having 'registered' in one's emotional awareness, and on the basis of this I reject the claim that emotions constitute significance. Finally, prompted by Gallegos, I elaborate on why, on my view,