了解情绪:回复de Sousa, Beisecker和Gallegos

R. A. Furtak
{"title":"了解情绪:回复de Sousa, Beisecker和Gallegos","authors":"R. A. Furtak","doi":"10.33497/jpe.v1i1.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Beginning with de Sousa's question about how my position is related to that of \"enactive\" theorists, I spell out my emphasis on the unity of affective experience, and say more about my conception of the emotional \"a priori.\" In response to Beisecker, I elaborate by way of a literary example on how a significant fact can exist without yet having 'registered' in one's emotional awareness, and on the basis of this I reject the claim that emotions constitute significance. Finally, prompted by Gallegos, I elaborate on why, on my view,","PeriodicalId":329066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing Emotions: Replies to de Sousa, Beisecker, and Gallegos\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Furtak\",\"doi\":\"10.33497/jpe.v1i1.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Beginning with de Sousa's question about how my position is related to that of \\\"enactive\\\" theorists, I spell out my emphasis on the unity of affective experience, and say more about my conception of the emotional \\\"a priori.\\\" In response to Beisecker, I elaborate by way of a literary example on how a significant fact can exist without yet having 'registered' in one's emotional awareness, and on the basis of this I reject the claim that emotions constitute significance. Finally, prompted by Gallegos, I elaborate on why, on my view,\",\"PeriodicalId\":329066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33497/jpe.v1i1.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33497/jpe.v1i1.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从de Sousa关于我的立场如何与“行动”理论家的立场相关联的问题开始,我阐明了我对情感经验统一性的强调,并更多地阐述了我对情感“先验”的概念。作为对Beisecker的回应,我以一个文学例子的方式阐述了一个重要的事实是如何存在的,而没有在一个人的情感意识中“注册”,在此基础上,我拒绝了情感构成意义的说法。最后,在加莱戈斯的启发下,我详细阐述了为什么,在我看来,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowing Emotions: Replies to de Sousa, Beisecker, and Gallegos
: Beginning with de Sousa's question about how my position is related to that of "enactive" theorists, I spell out my emphasis on the unity of affective experience, and say more about my conception of the emotional "a priori." In response to Beisecker, I elaborate by way of a literary example on how a significant fact can exist without yet having 'registered' in one's emotional awareness, and on the basis of this I reject the claim that emotions constitute significance. Finally, prompted by Gallegos, I elaborate on why, on my view,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信