数字电路的有效设计纠错

D. W. Hoffmann, T. Kropf
{"title":"数字电路的有效设计纠错","authors":"D. W. Hoffmann, T. Kropf","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.2000.878324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equivalence checking of two circuits is performed at several stages in the design cycle of hardware designs and various commercial equivalence checkers, mostly based on Boolean logic, are already in the market. Design Error Diagnosis and Correction (DEDC) methods come into play when equivalence checking has proven two circuits to be different. In many cases, DEDC methods can locate and correct design errors fully automatically. In this paper, we present an efficient symbolic method for automatic error correction of both combinational and synchronous sequential circuits. We first address the problem of rectifying combinational circuits and then show how the problem of rectifying sequential circuits can be reduced to a combinational problem without unrolling the combinational logic parts. In addition, we introduce several optimizations to our algorithm. All optimizations are safe, meaning that they neither affect the number of computed solutions nor do they neither affect the number of computed solutions nor do they decrease the quality of results. Our experimental results show that the discussed optimization strategies can make the rectification procedure 2 to 16 times faster than the unoptimized algorithm.","PeriodicalId":437697,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Computer Design","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient design error correction of digital circuits\",\"authors\":\"D. W. Hoffmann, T. Kropf\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCD.2000.878324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Equivalence checking of two circuits is performed at several stages in the design cycle of hardware designs and various commercial equivalence checkers, mostly based on Boolean logic, are already in the market. Design Error Diagnosis and Correction (DEDC) methods come into play when equivalence checking has proven two circuits to be different. In many cases, DEDC methods can locate and correct design errors fully automatically. In this paper, we present an efficient symbolic method for automatic error correction of both combinational and synchronous sequential circuits. We first address the problem of rectifying combinational circuits and then show how the problem of rectifying sequential circuits can be reduced to a combinational problem without unrolling the combinational logic parts. In addition, we introduce several optimizations to our algorithm. All optimizations are safe, meaning that they neither affect the number of computed solutions nor do they neither affect the number of computed solutions nor do they decrease the quality of results. Our experimental results show that the discussed optimization strategies can make the rectification procedure 2 to 16 times faster than the unoptimized algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Computer Design\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Computer Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2000.878324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Computer Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2000.878324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

两个电路的等效性检查是在硬件设计周期的几个阶段进行的,各种商用等效性检查器,大多基于布尔逻辑,已经在市场上。当等效性检查证明两个电路不同时,设计错误诊断和校正(DEDC)方法就发挥作用了。在许多情况下,DEDC方法可以完全自动地定位和纠正设计错误。本文提出了一种有效的组合顺序电路和同步顺序电路的自动纠错符号方法。我们首先解决整流组合电路的问题,然后展示如何在不展开组合逻辑部分的情况下将整流顺序电路的问题简化为组合问题。此外,我们还对算法进行了一些优化。所有优化都是安全的,这意味着它们既不会影响计算的解决方案的数量,也不会影响计算的解决方案的数量,也不会降低结果的质量。实验结果表明,所讨论的优化策略比未优化算法的校正速度快2 ~ 16倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficient design error correction of digital circuits
Equivalence checking of two circuits is performed at several stages in the design cycle of hardware designs and various commercial equivalence checkers, mostly based on Boolean logic, are already in the market. Design Error Diagnosis and Correction (DEDC) methods come into play when equivalence checking has proven two circuits to be different. In many cases, DEDC methods can locate and correct design errors fully automatically. In this paper, we present an efficient symbolic method for automatic error correction of both combinational and synchronous sequential circuits. We first address the problem of rectifying combinational circuits and then show how the problem of rectifying sequential circuits can be reduced to a combinational problem without unrolling the combinational logic parts. In addition, we introduce several optimizations to our algorithm. All optimizations are safe, meaning that they neither affect the number of computed solutions nor do they neither affect the number of computed solutions nor do they decrease the quality of results. Our experimental results show that the discussed optimization strategies can make the rectification procedure 2 to 16 times faster than the unoptimized algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信