主动队列管理算法的比较

Shijuan Zhang, Jinsheng Sun
{"title":"主动队列管理算法的比较","authors":"Shijuan Zhang, Jinsheng Sun","doi":"10.1109/WCICA.2004.1340874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active queue management (AQM) is a very active research area in network congestion control. A number of active queue management algorithms such as PI controller, DRED, SRED, Blue, REM, and PD-RED have been proposed in the past few years. This paper presents a comparative study of these algorithms using simulations. The performance metric used in the study is queue length. Our results demonstrate that PD-RED is more effective at stabilizing the queue length, and the performance of PD-RED is obviously better than that of PI controller, DRED, SRED, Blue and REM.","PeriodicalId":331407,"journal":{"name":"Fifth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04EX788)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of active queue management algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Shijuan Zhang, Jinsheng Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WCICA.2004.1340874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Active queue management (AQM) is a very active research area in network congestion control. A number of active queue management algorithms such as PI controller, DRED, SRED, Blue, REM, and PD-RED have been proposed in the past few years. This paper presents a comparative study of these algorithms using simulations. The performance metric used in the study is queue length. Our results demonstrate that PD-RED is more effective at stabilizing the queue length, and the performance of PD-RED is obviously better than that of PI controller, DRED, SRED, Blue and REM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04EX788)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04EX788)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WCICA.2004.1340874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04EX788)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WCICA.2004.1340874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

主动队列管理(AQM)是网络拥塞控制中一个非常活跃的研究领域。在过去的几年中,已经提出了许多主动队列管理算法,如PI控制器、DRED、SRED、Blue、REM和PD-RED。本文通过仿真对这些算法进行了比较研究。研究中使用的性能指标是队列长度。结果表明,PD-RED在稳定队列长度方面更为有效,其性能明显优于PI控制器、DRED、SRED、Blue和REM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of active queue management algorithms
Active queue management (AQM) is a very active research area in network congestion control. A number of active queue management algorithms such as PI controller, DRED, SRED, Blue, REM, and PD-RED have been proposed in the past few years. This paper presents a comparative study of these algorithms using simulations. The performance metric used in the study is queue length. Our results demonstrate that PD-RED is more effective at stabilizing the queue length, and the performance of PD-RED is obviously better than that of PI controller, DRED, SRED, Blue and REM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信