后记

Andrew F. Lang
{"title":"后记","authors":"Andrew F. Lang","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660073.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The epilogue uses speeches and writings in 1880s from Frederick Douglass, Albion Tourgée, and Ulysses S. Grant to explore the contested meanings, outcomes, and implications of the American Civil War Era. Each correspondent explained that the era’s noble verdicts—Union, emancipation, and civil rights—were at once mutually reinforcing and antagonistic. To uphold the foundational ideals of Union required emancipation and the Reconstruction amendments. But biracial equality itself required enforcement from a large, mobilized, federal and military state that allegedly undermined the United States’ claim as a decentralized, antimilitaristic republic. The era was thus a referendum on the attributes of nineteenth-century American exceptionalism, just as those very attributes conflicted with the idealistic purposes of the era.","PeriodicalId":262145,"journal":{"name":"A Contest of Civilizations","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epilogue\",\"authors\":\"Andrew F. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660073.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The epilogue uses speeches and writings in 1880s from Frederick Douglass, Albion Tourgée, and Ulysses S. Grant to explore the contested meanings, outcomes, and implications of the American Civil War Era. Each correspondent explained that the era’s noble verdicts—Union, emancipation, and civil rights—were at once mutually reinforcing and antagonistic. To uphold the foundational ideals of Union required emancipation and the Reconstruction amendments. But biracial equality itself required enforcement from a large, mobilized, federal and military state that allegedly undermined the United States’ claim as a decentralized, antimilitaristic republic. The era was thus a referendum on the attributes of nineteenth-century American exceptionalism, just as those very attributes conflicted with the idealistic purposes of the era.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Contest of Civilizations\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Contest of Civilizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660073.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Contest of Civilizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469660073.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结语部分使用了弗雷德里克·道格拉斯、阿尔比恩·图尔格梅和尤利西斯·s·格兰特在19世纪80年代发表的演讲和著作,探讨了美国内战时期有争议的意义、结果和影响。每个记者都解释说,那个时代的崇高信条——联邦、解放和公民权利——既相互促进,又相互对立。为了维护联邦的基本理想,需要解放和重建修正案。但是,种族平等本身需要一个庞大的、动员起来的、联邦的和军事的国家来执行,这据称破坏了美国作为一个分散的、反军国主义共和国的主张。因此,这个时代是对19世纪美国例外论属性的全民公决,就像这些属性与那个时代的理想主义目的相冲突一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epilogue
The epilogue uses speeches and writings in 1880s from Frederick Douglass, Albion Tourgée, and Ulysses S. Grant to explore the contested meanings, outcomes, and implications of the American Civil War Era. Each correspondent explained that the era’s noble verdicts—Union, emancipation, and civil rights—were at once mutually reinforcing and antagonistic. To uphold the foundational ideals of Union required emancipation and the Reconstruction amendments. But biracial equality itself required enforcement from a large, mobilized, federal and military state that allegedly undermined the United States’ claim as a decentralized, antimilitaristic republic. The era was thus a referendum on the attributes of nineteenth-century American exceptionalism, just as those very attributes conflicted with the idealistic purposes of the era.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信