为什么长线股票风险较低?基于期限的价值溢价解释

Jessica A. Wachter, M. Lettau
{"title":"为什么长线股票风险较低?基于期限的价值溢价解释","authors":"Jessica A. Wachter, M. Lettau","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.661346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a dynamic risk-based model that captures the value premium. Firms are modeled as long-lived assets distinguished by the timing of cash flows. The stochastic discount factor is specified so that shocks to aggregate dividends are priced, but shocks to the discount rate are not. The model implies that growth firms covary more with the discount rate than do value firms, which covary more with cash flows. When calibrated to explain aggregate stock market behavior, the model accounts for the observed value premium, the high Sharpe ratios on value firms, and the poor performance of the CAPM. THIS PAPER PROPOSES A DYNAMIC RISK-BASED MODEL that captures both the high expected returns on value stocks relative to growth stocks, and the failure of the capital asset pricing model to explain these expected returns. The value premium, first noted by Graham and Dodd (1934), is the finding that assets with a high ratio of price to fundamentals (growth stocks) have low expected returns relative to assets with a low ratio of price to fundamentals (value stocks). This finding by itself is not necessarily surprising, as it is possible that the premium on value stocks represents compensation for bearing systematic risk. However, Fama and French (1992) and others show that the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) of Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) cannot account for the value premium: While the CAPM predicts that expected returns should rise with the beta on the market portfolio, value stocks have higher expected returns yet do not have higher betas than growth stocks. To model the difference between value and growth stocks, we introduce a cross-section of long-lived firms distinguished by the timing of their cash flows. Firms with cash flows weighted more to the future endogenously have high price ratios, while firms with cash flows weighted more to the present have low price ratios. Analogous to long-term bonds, growth firms are high-duration ∗ Lettau is at the Stern School of Business at New York University. Wachter is at the Wharton","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"509","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium\",\"authors\":\"Jessica A. Wachter, M. Lettau\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.661346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a dynamic risk-based model that captures the value premium. Firms are modeled as long-lived assets distinguished by the timing of cash flows. The stochastic discount factor is specified so that shocks to aggregate dividends are priced, but shocks to the discount rate are not. The model implies that growth firms covary more with the discount rate than do value firms, which covary more with cash flows. When calibrated to explain aggregate stock market behavior, the model accounts for the observed value premium, the high Sharpe ratios on value firms, and the poor performance of the CAPM. THIS PAPER PROPOSES A DYNAMIC RISK-BASED MODEL that captures both the high expected returns on value stocks relative to growth stocks, and the failure of the capital asset pricing model to explain these expected returns. The value premium, first noted by Graham and Dodd (1934), is the finding that assets with a high ratio of price to fundamentals (growth stocks) have low expected returns relative to assets with a low ratio of price to fundamentals (value stocks). This finding by itself is not necessarily surprising, as it is possible that the premium on value stocks represents compensation for bearing systematic risk. However, Fama and French (1992) and others show that the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) of Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) cannot account for the value premium: While the CAPM predicts that expected returns should rise with the beta on the market portfolio, value stocks have higher expected returns yet do not have higher betas than growth stocks. To model the difference between value and growth stocks, we introduce a cross-section of long-lived firms distinguished by the timing of their cash flows. Firms with cash flows weighted more to the future endogenously have high price ratios, while firms with cash flows weighted more to the present have low price ratios. Analogous to long-term bonds, growth firms are high-duration ∗ Lettau is at the Stern School of Business at New York University. Wachter is at the Wharton\",\"PeriodicalId\":124312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"509\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.661346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.661346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 509

摘要

我们提出了一个动态的基于风险的模型来捕捉价值溢价。公司被建模为长期资产,其特征是现金流的时间。指定随机折现因子,以便对总股息的冲击定价,但对折现率的冲击没有定价。该模型表明,增长型公司与贴现率的协变大于价值型公司,后者与现金流量的协变更大。当校准以解释总体股票市场行为时,该模型解释了观察到的价值溢价、价值公司的高夏普比率以及CAPM的糟糕表现。本文提出了一个动态的基于风险的模型,该模型捕捉了价值股相对于成长型股票的高预期收益,以及资本资产定价模型无法解释这些预期收益。价值溢价最早由Graham和Dodd(1934)提出,指的是价格与基本面之比高的资产(成长型股票)相对于价格与基本面之比低的资产(价值型股票)具有较低的预期回报。这一发现本身并不一定令人惊讶,因为价值型股票的溢价可能代表了对承担系统性风险的补偿。然而,Fama和French(1992)等人表明,Sharpe(1964)和Lintner(1965)的资本资产定价模型(CAPM)不能解释价值溢价:CAPM预测预期收益应随着市场投资组合的贝塔值而上升,价值股的预期收益更高,但贝塔值并不高于成长型股票。为了模拟价值型和成长型股票之间的差异,我们引入了一个由现金流时间区分的长寿公司的横截面。现金流量内生地偏向未来的企业具有较高的市盈率,而现金流量内生地偏向现在的企业具有较低的市盈率。与长期债券类似,成长型公司是高存续期的(*)。沃赫特在沃顿商学院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium
We propose a dynamic risk-based model that captures the value premium. Firms are modeled as long-lived assets distinguished by the timing of cash flows. The stochastic discount factor is specified so that shocks to aggregate dividends are priced, but shocks to the discount rate are not. The model implies that growth firms covary more with the discount rate than do value firms, which covary more with cash flows. When calibrated to explain aggregate stock market behavior, the model accounts for the observed value premium, the high Sharpe ratios on value firms, and the poor performance of the CAPM. THIS PAPER PROPOSES A DYNAMIC RISK-BASED MODEL that captures both the high expected returns on value stocks relative to growth stocks, and the failure of the capital asset pricing model to explain these expected returns. The value premium, first noted by Graham and Dodd (1934), is the finding that assets with a high ratio of price to fundamentals (growth stocks) have low expected returns relative to assets with a low ratio of price to fundamentals (value stocks). This finding by itself is not necessarily surprising, as it is possible that the premium on value stocks represents compensation for bearing systematic risk. However, Fama and French (1992) and others show that the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) of Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) cannot account for the value premium: While the CAPM predicts that expected returns should rise with the beta on the market portfolio, value stocks have higher expected returns yet do not have higher betas than growth stocks. To model the difference between value and growth stocks, we introduce a cross-section of long-lived firms distinguished by the timing of their cash flows. Firms with cash flows weighted more to the future endogenously have high price ratios, while firms with cash flows weighted more to the present have low price ratios. Analogous to long-term bonds, growth firms are high-duration ∗ Lettau is at the Stern School of Business at New York University. Wachter is at the Wharton
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信