依赖源应用程序中两种延迟插入方法的比较

Ping Liu, Jilin Tan, Zhongyong Zhou, J. Schutt-Ainé, P. Goh
{"title":"依赖源应用程序中两种延迟插入方法的比较","authors":"Ping Liu, Jilin Tan, Zhongyong Zhou, J. Schutt-Ainé, P. Goh","doi":"10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two different formulations of the latency insertion method (LIM) for the analysis of circuits with dependent sources. One is the scalar LIM and the other is the amplification matrix LIM. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the scalar LIM necessitates much smaller time step than the amplification matrix LIM when handling certain types of dependent sources indicating better performance of the latter technique without a sacrifice in accuracy.","PeriodicalId":313560,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two latency insertion methods in dependent sources applications\",\"authors\":\"Ping Liu, Jilin Tan, Zhongyong Zhou, J. Schutt-Ainé, P. Goh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares two different formulations of the latency insertion method (LIM) for the analysis of circuits with dependent sources. One is the scalar LIM and the other is the amplification matrix LIM. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the scalar LIM necessitates much smaller time step than the amplification matrix LIM when handling certain types of dependent sources indicating better performance of the latter technique without a sacrifice in accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文比较了两种不同的延迟插入法(LIM)的公式,用于分析具有依赖源的电路。一种是标量LIM,另一种是放大矩阵LIM。数值实验表明,在处理特定类型的依赖源时,标量LIM比放大矩阵LIM所需的时间步长要小得多,表明后者在不牺牲精度的情况下具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of two latency insertion methods in dependent sources applications
This paper compares two different formulations of the latency insertion method (LIM) for the analysis of circuits with dependent sources. One is the scalar LIM and the other is the amplification matrix LIM. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the scalar LIM necessitates much smaller time step than the amplification matrix LIM when handling certain types of dependent sources indicating better performance of the latter technique without a sacrifice in accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信