在3d路径概念中连续下降到达程序的下降配置文件选项

K. Tong, E. Schoemig, D. Boyle, J. Scharl, A. Haraldsdottir
{"title":"在3d路径概念中连续下降到达程序的下降配置文件选项","authors":"K. Tong, E. Schoemig, D. Boyle, J. Scharl, A. Haraldsdottir","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2007.4391872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuous descent approach/arrival (CDA) procedures with idle thrust descent have demonstrated significant reduction in community noise, fuel burn, emissions and flight time when compared with conventional step-down procedures. However, to date such CDA procedures have only been implemented in low traffic conditions. This is partly due to the fact that air traffic control (ATC) lacks the required ground automation to provide separation assurance services during CDA operations. Additionally, the deployment of CDA procedures in medium to high traffic conditions is hindered by the lack of capability on the ground to reliably predict the trajectory as executed by the airplane when descending under idle thrust. Insufficient or inaccurate knowledge on the ground regarding aircraft type, weight, aircraft specific operations and wind profiles in the flight management system (FMS), etc. can lead to large deviations between the ground computed profile and the actual profile flown. Partially powered, low thrust CDA along a geometric vertical path provides a possible alternative to idle descents. Geometric paths explicitly specify the vertical profile that the aircraft will fly and hence provide increased predictability on the ground and significantly improved common situational awareness in the air and on the ground. These benefits come at the expense of increased noise, fuel burn, emissions, and flight time for individual flight in comparison to idle thrust descents. With proper design, however, it can be shown that the increases can be quite reasonable. The higher predictability will make this descent concept feasible in high traffic conditions. The overall benefits in noise, fuel burn, and flight time for the entire arrival stream can still be much higher than the level achievable with current step-down procedures. When combined with the 3D path arrival management (3D PAM) concept using lateral path options, the resultant operational concept provides a highly predictable 3D descent trajectory and, with supporting ground automation, enables the implementation of CDA procedures in high traffic conditions. In this paper, we will report relevant design considerations for geometric path CDAs and trade-offs between this low thrust descent scheme and idle thrust descents. The implementation of this descent scheme within the 3D PAM concept will also be discussed.","PeriodicalId":242641,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descent profile options for continuous descent arrival procedures within 3d path concept\",\"authors\":\"K. Tong, E. Schoemig, D. Boyle, J. Scharl, A. Haraldsdottir\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASC.2007.4391872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Continuous descent approach/arrival (CDA) procedures with idle thrust descent have demonstrated significant reduction in community noise, fuel burn, emissions and flight time when compared with conventional step-down procedures. However, to date such CDA procedures have only been implemented in low traffic conditions. This is partly due to the fact that air traffic control (ATC) lacks the required ground automation to provide separation assurance services during CDA operations. Additionally, the deployment of CDA procedures in medium to high traffic conditions is hindered by the lack of capability on the ground to reliably predict the trajectory as executed by the airplane when descending under idle thrust. Insufficient or inaccurate knowledge on the ground regarding aircraft type, weight, aircraft specific operations and wind profiles in the flight management system (FMS), etc. can lead to large deviations between the ground computed profile and the actual profile flown. Partially powered, low thrust CDA along a geometric vertical path provides a possible alternative to idle descents. Geometric paths explicitly specify the vertical profile that the aircraft will fly and hence provide increased predictability on the ground and significantly improved common situational awareness in the air and on the ground. These benefits come at the expense of increased noise, fuel burn, emissions, and flight time for individual flight in comparison to idle thrust descents. With proper design, however, it can be shown that the increases can be quite reasonable. The higher predictability will make this descent concept feasible in high traffic conditions. The overall benefits in noise, fuel burn, and flight time for the entire arrival stream can still be much higher than the level achievable with current step-down procedures. When combined with the 3D path arrival management (3D PAM) concept using lateral path options, the resultant operational concept provides a highly predictable 3D descent trajectory and, with supporting ground automation, enables the implementation of CDA procedures in high traffic conditions. In this paper, we will report relevant design considerations for geometric path CDAs and trade-offs between this low thrust descent scheme and idle thrust descents. The implementation of this descent scheme within the 3D PAM concept will also be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2007.4391872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2007.4391872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

与传统的降压程序相比,采用怠速推力下降的连续下降进近/到达(CDA)程序在社区噪音、燃油消耗、排放和飞行时间方面都有显著降低。然而,到目前为止,这种CDA程序只在低交通条件下实施。部分原因是空中交通管制(ATC)缺乏必要的地面自动化,无法在CDA操作期间提供分离保障服务。此外,由于地面缺乏可靠地预测飞机在怠速推力下下降时执行的轨迹的能力,CDA程序在中高交通条件下的部署受到阻碍。地面对飞机类型、重量、飞机具体操作、飞行管理系统(FMS)中的风廓线等方面的了解不充分或不准确,会导致地面计算的廓线与实际飞行的廓线存在较大偏差。部分动力,沿着几何垂直路径的低推力CDA为空转下降提供了可能的替代方案。几何路径明确规定了飞机将飞行的垂直轮廓,因此增加了地面的可预测性,并显著提高了空中和地面的共同态势感知能力。与空转推力下降相比,这些好处是以增加噪音、燃油消耗、排放和单个飞行时间为代价的。然而,通过适当的设计,可以证明这些增长是相当合理的。更高的可预测性将使这种下降概念在高交通条件下可行。在噪音、燃油消耗和整个到达流的飞行时间方面的总体效益仍然远远高于目前的降压程序所能达到的水平。当与使用横向路径选项的3D路径到达管理(3D PAM)概念相结合时,生成的操作概念提供了高度可预测的3D下降轨迹,并支持地面自动化,使CDA程序能够在高交通条件下实施。在本文中,我们将报告几何路径cda的相关设计考虑因素以及这种低推力下降方案与怠速推力下降方案之间的权衡。还将讨论在3D PAM概念中实现这种下降方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Descent profile options for continuous descent arrival procedures within 3d path concept
Continuous descent approach/arrival (CDA) procedures with idle thrust descent have demonstrated significant reduction in community noise, fuel burn, emissions and flight time when compared with conventional step-down procedures. However, to date such CDA procedures have only been implemented in low traffic conditions. This is partly due to the fact that air traffic control (ATC) lacks the required ground automation to provide separation assurance services during CDA operations. Additionally, the deployment of CDA procedures in medium to high traffic conditions is hindered by the lack of capability on the ground to reliably predict the trajectory as executed by the airplane when descending under idle thrust. Insufficient or inaccurate knowledge on the ground regarding aircraft type, weight, aircraft specific operations and wind profiles in the flight management system (FMS), etc. can lead to large deviations between the ground computed profile and the actual profile flown. Partially powered, low thrust CDA along a geometric vertical path provides a possible alternative to idle descents. Geometric paths explicitly specify the vertical profile that the aircraft will fly and hence provide increased predictability on the ground and significantly improved common situational awareness in the air and on the ground. These benefits come at the expense of increased noise, fuel burn, emissions, and flight time for individual flight in comparison to idle thrust descents. With proper design, however, it can be shown that the increases can be quite reasonable. The higher predictability will make this descent concept feasible in high traffic conditions. The overall benefits in noise, fuel burn, and flight time for the entire arrival stream can still be much higher than the level achievable with current step-down procedures. When combined with the 3D path arrival management (3D PAM) concept using lateral path options, the resultant operational concept provides a highly predictable 3D descent trajectory and, with supporting ground automation, enables the implementation of CDA procedures in high traffic conditions. In this paper, we will report relevant design considerations for geometric path CDAs and trade-offs between this low thrust descent scheme and idle thrust descents. The implementation of this descent scheme within the 3D PAM concept will also be discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信