阅读理解中的测试方式重要吗?当学习者的感知进入画面

A. Amjadi
{"title":"阅读理解中的测试方式重要吗?当学习者的感知进入画面","authors":"A. Amjadi","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2022.2159901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last few years, technology has offered new ways of teaching and learning. Accordingly, educational systems are adopting what technology has purveyed to education. The abrupt upsurge of the COVID-19 pandemic also expedited this employment and impelled educational systems to shift to online teaching and learning. Consequently, the offline and paper-based mode of testing has been being replaced with the online and remote mode. Whether the testing mode itself, in its nature, affects the use of reading comprehension strategies and whether learners follow the same patterns of strategies during offline and online reading comprehension tests have not been paid enough attention by scholars, and the findings of few studies in this regard in the literature are also disparate. Thus, the present paper investigated and compared the use of strategies and their patterns of use in offline and online reading comprehension testing. The quantitative analysis of the data revealed that learners apply reading comprehension strategies more in the offline testing mode although they employ the same patterns of strategies in offline and online reading comprehension testing. The qualitative phase of the study uncovered the reasons. That is learners' perception, shaped by their experience and familiarization with the mode of testing;individual differences;washback and reverse washback effects;and affective and emotional factors, yields this difference. Implications and suggestions for future research are also discussed. [ FROM AUTHOR]","PeriodicalId":233397,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Mode of Testing Matter in Reading Comprehension? When Learners’ Perception Enters into the Picture\",\"authors\":\"A. Amjadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10573569.2022.2159901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last few years, technology has offered new ways of teaching and learning. Accordingly, educational systems are adopting what technology has purveyed to education. The abrupt upsurge of the COVID-19 pandemic also expedited this employment and impelled educational systems to shift to online teaching and learning. Consequently, the offline and paper-based mode of testing has been being replaced with the online and remote mode. Whether the testing mode itself, in its nature, affects the use of reading comprehension strategies and whether learners follow the same patterns of strategies during offline and online reading comprehension tests have not been paid enough attention by scholars, and the findings of few studies in this regard in the literature are also disparate. Thus, the present paper investigated and compared the use of strategies and their patterns of use in offline and online reading comprehension testing. The quantitative analysis of the data revealed that learners apply reading comprehension strategies more in the offline testing mode although they employ the same patterns of strategies in offline and online reading comprehension testing. The qualitative phase of the study uncovered the reasons. That is learners' perception, shaped by their experience and familiarization with the mode of testing;individual differences;washback and reverse washback effects;and affective and emotional factors, yields this difference. Implications and suggestions for future research are also discussed. [ FROM AUTHOR]\",\"PeriodicalId\":233397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2159901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2159901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的几年里,科技提供了新的教学方式。因此,教育系统正在采用技术提供给教育的东西。新冠肺炎疫情的突然爆发也加速了这一就业,并促使教育系统转向在线教学。因此,离线和基于纸张的测试模式已经被在线和远程模式所取代。测试模式本身是否影响阅读理解策略的使用,以及学习者在离线和在线阅读理解测试中是否遵循相同的策略模式,一直没有得到学者们足够的重视,文献中关于这方面的研究也很少,研究结果也各不相同。因此,本文调查并比较了离线和在线阅读理解测试中策略的使用及其使用模式。数据的定量分析表明,尽管学习者在离线和在线阅读理解测试中使用的策略模式相同,但他们在离线测试模式下更多地使用阅读理解策略。研究的定性阶段揭示了原因。这种差异是由学习者的经验和对测试模式的熟悉程度、个体差异、反冲和反反冲效应以及情感和情绪因素所形成的感知造成的。并对未来研究的意义和建议进行了讨论。[源自作者]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Mode of Testing Matter in Reading Comprehension? When Learners’ Perception Enters into the Picture
Over the last few years, technology has offered new ways of teaching and learning. Accordingly, educational systems are adopting what technology has purveyed to education. The abrupt upsurge of the COVID-19 pandemic also expedited this employment and impelled educational systems to shift to online teaching and learning. Consequently, the offline and paper-based mode of testing has been being replaced with the online and remote mode. Whether the testing mode itself, in its nature, affects the use of reading comprehension strategies and whether learners follow the same patterns of strategies during offline and online reading comprehension tests have not been paid enough attention by scholars, and the findings of few studies in this regard in the literature are also disparate. Thus, the present paper investigated and compared the use of strategies and their patterns of use in offline and online reading comprehension testing. The quantitative analysis of the data revealed that learners apply reading comprehension strategies more in the offline testing mode although they employ the same patterns of strategies in offline and online reading comprehension testing. The qualitative phase of the study uncovered the reasons. That is learners' perception, shaped by their experience and familiarization with the mode of testing;individual differences;washback and reverse washback effects;and affective and emotional factors, yields this difference. Implications and suggestions for future research are also discussed. [ FROM AUTHOR]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信