药物预处理可减轻肺癌患者化疗引起的呕吐

Liangliang Ma, Jiuqin Lu, Xinyue Wang, Zhu-jun Liu, Jing Wang, Kai Li
{"title":"药物预处理可减轻肺癌患者化疗引起的呕吐","authors":"Liangliang Ma, Jiuqin Lu, Xinyue Wang, Zhu-jun Liu, Jing Wang, Kai Li","doi":"10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-8179.20131985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate whether medical interventions on the gastrointestinal symptoms before chemotherapy-in- duced vomiting can relieve vomiting, and to identify the optimal measures to prevent chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Methods: Data from 229 cases undergoing chemotherapy were enrolled into this clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups at a ra- tio of 1∶1, and recognized 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were administered to the patients during chemotherapy. In the intervention group, the protocols were also conducted during chemotherapy, which were designed as the combined agents metoclopramide, diphenhydr- amine, mziren capsule, and medroxyprogesterone in group 1 and only metoclopramide in group 2. Empirical medicines were given to the control group only when grade 2 (CTCEA v4.0) or stronger gastrointestinal symptoms occurred. The antiemetic efficacy was de- fined to have four levels, '0' means no vomiting, '1'means 1 to 2 episodes occurred in 24 hours, '2' means 3 to 5 episodes in 24 hours, and '3' means 6 or more episodes in 24 hours. Levels 0 and 1 are regarded as response to the treatment, and levels 2 and 3 as failure. The vomit prevention effects in the two groups were compared using the Multi-sample Rank Sum Test, and the effects in the subgroups were compared in a pairwise manner. Results: A total of 305 chemotherapeutic cycles were carried out, including 150 cycles in the in- tervention group: protocol 1 was performed using 76 cycles, and protocol 2 was performed using 74 cycles. There were 155 cycles in the control group. The multi-sample rank sum test (Kruskal-Wallis test) shows that the mean ranks of the antiemetic effects are 93.39, 150.13, and 183.60 in subgroups 1 and 2, and the control group, respectively. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was 56.74 (P< 0.001). The response rate of group 1 was significantly superior to that of group 2 (P=0.015). The Chi-square test shows that the differ- ences of KPS before and after the chemotherapy are significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Medical intervention on the premonitory symp- toms can significantly relieve chemotherapy-induced vomiting, improve the quality of life of the patient, and ensure a smooth progress in the chemotherapy. The vomiting relieving effect of the metoclopramide, diphenhydramine, mziren capsule, and medroxyprogesterone treatment is better than the single-agent protocol and should be recommended as the regimen of preventing chemotherapy-induced vom-","PeriodicalId":314105,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical pretreatment relieves chemotherapy-induced vomiting in lung cancer patients\",\"authors\":\"Liangliang Ma, Jiuqin Lu, Xinyue Wang, Zhu-jun Liu, Jing Wang, Kai Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-8179.20131985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To investigate whether medical interventions on the gastrointestinal symptoms before chemotherapy-in- duced vomiting can relieve vomiting, and to identify the optimal measures to prevent chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Methods: Data from 229 cases undergoing chemotherapy were enrolled into this clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups at a ra- tio of 1∶1, and recognized 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were administered to the patients during chemotherapy. In the intervention group, the protocols were also conducted during chemotherapy, which were designed as the combined agents metoclopramide, diphenhydr- amine, mziren capsule, and medroxyprogesterone in group 1 and only metoclopramide in group 2. Empirical medicines were given to the control group only when grade 2 (CTCEA v4.0) or stronger gastrointestinal symptoms occurred. The antiemetic efficacy was de- fined to have four levels, '0' means no vomiting, '1'means 1 to 2 episodes occurred in 24 hours, '2' means 3 to 5 episodes in 24 hours, and '3' means 6 or more episodes in 24 hours. Levels 0 and 1 are regarded as response to the treatment, and levels 2 and 3 as failure. The vomit prevention effects in the two groups were compared using the Multi-sample Rank Sum Test, and the effects in the subgroups were compared in a pairwise manner. Results: A total of 305 chemotherapeutic cycles were carried out, including 150 cycles in the in- tervention group: protocol 1 was performed using 76 cycles, and protocol 2 was performed using 74 cycles. There were 155 cycles in the control group. The multi-sample rank sum test (Kruskal-Wallis test) shows that the mean ranks of the antiemetic effects are 93.39, 150.13, and 183.60 in subgroups 1 and 2, and the control group, respectively. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was 56.74 (P< 0.001). The response rate of group 1 was significantly superior to that of group 2 (P=0.015). The Chi-square test shows that the differ- ences of KPS before and after the chemotherapy are significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Medical intervention on the premonitory symp- toms can significantly relieve chemotherapy-induced vomiting, improve the quality of life of the patient, and ensure a smooth progress in the chemotherapy. The vomiting relieving effect of the metoclopramide, diphenhydramine, mziren capsule, and medroxyprogesterone treatment is better than the single-agent protocol and should be recommended as the regimen of preventing chemotherapy-induced vom-\",\"PeriodicalId\":314105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"196 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-8179.20131985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-8179.20131985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨药物干预化疗致呕吐前胃肠道症状是否能缓解呕吐,并探讨预防化疗致呕吐的最佳措施。方法:选取229例化疗患者进行临床研究。患者按1∶1的比例随机分为两组,化疗期间给予经识别的5-HT3受体拮抗剂。干预组在化疗期间也进行方案设计,1组为甲氧氯普胺、苯海拉明、mziren胶囊、甲羟黄体酮联合用药,2组为仅使用甲氧氯普胺。对照组仅在出现2级(CTCEA v4.0)或更强胃肠道症状时给予经验药物治疗。止吐效果分为四个级别,0表示无呕吐,1表示24小时内发生1至2次呕吐,2表示24小时内发生3至5次呕吐,3表示24小时内发生6次或以上呕吐。0级和1级被视为对治疗有反应,2级和3级被视为治疗失败。两组预防呕吐效果采用多样本秩和检验进行比较,各亚组效果采用两两比较。结果:共进行305个化疗周期,其中干预组150个周期,方案1 76个周期,方案2 74个周期。对照组共155个周期。多样本秩和检验(Kruskal-Wallis检验)显示,亚组1、亚组2和对照组止吐效果的平均秩分别为93.39、150.13和183.60。1组与2组的差异为56.74 (P< 0.001)。1组有效率显著优于2组(P=0.015)。经卡方检验,化疗前后KPS差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:药物干预可显著缓解化疗性呕吐症状,改善患者生活质量,保证化疗顺利进行。甲氧氯普胺、苯海拉明、mziren胶囊、甲羟孕酮联合治疗的缓解呕吐效果优于单药方案,应作为预防化疗诱导呕吐的方案予以推荐
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical pretreatment relieves chemotherapy-induced vomiting in lung cancer patients
Objective: To investigate whether medical interventions on the gastrointestinal symptoms before chemotherapy-in- duced vomiting can relieve vomiting, and to identify the optimal measures to prevent chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Methods: Data from 229 cases undergoing chemotherapy were enrolled into this clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups at a ra- tio of 1∶1, and recognized 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were administered to the patients during chemotherapy. In the intervention group, the protocols were also conducted during chemotherapy, which were designed as the combined agents metoclopramide, diphenhydr- amine, mziren capsule, and medroxyprogesterone in group 1 and only metoclopramide in group 2. Empirical medicines were given to the control group only when grade 2 (CTCEA v4.0) or stronger gastrointestinal symptoms occurred. The antiemetic efficacy was de- fined to have four levels, '0' means no vomiting, '1'means 1 to 2 episodes occurred in 24 hours, '2' means 3 to 5 episodes in 24 hours, and '3' means 6 or more episodes in 24 hours. Levels 0 and 1 are regarded as response to the treatment, and levels 2 and 3 as failure. The vomit prevention effects in the two groups were compared using the Multi-sample Rank Sum Test, and the effects in the subgroups were compared in a pairwise manner. Results: A total of 305 chemotherapeutic cycles were carried out, including 150 cycles in the in- tervention group: protocol 1 was performed using 76 cycles, and protocol 2 was performed using 74 cycles. There were 155 cycles in the control group. The multi-sample rank sum test (Kruskal-Wallis test) shows that the mean ranks of the antiemetic effects are 93.39, 150.13, and 183.60 in subgroups 1 and 2, and the control group, respectively. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was 56.74 (P< 0.001). The response rate of group 1 was significantly superior to that of group 2 (P=0.015). The Chi-square test shows that the differ- ences of KPS before and after the chemotherapy are significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Medical intervention on the premonitory symp- toms can significantly relieve chemotherapy-induced vomiting, improve the quality of life of the patient, and ensure a smooth progress in the chemotherapy. The vomiting relieving effect of the metoclopramide, diphenhydramine, mziren capsule, and medroxyprogesterone treatment is better than the single-agent protocol and should be recommended as the regimen of preventing chemotherapy-induced vom-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信