高等教育机构的效率与效益:分类与定义问题

Serhii Levchenko
{"title":"高等教育机构的效率与效益:分类与定义问题","authors":"Serhii Levchenko","doi":"10.32841/2413-2675/2021-49-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the existing definitions of effectiveness in the context of higher education, both those provided by the English dictionary, and domestic and foreign researchers, based on which the types of effectiveness are grouped. In addition, this article shows the differences between given definitions – efficiency and effectiveness. Also, the article indicates some areas of reforming higher education, both domestic and foreign experience. According to the author and reviewed literature, there should be a motivational system for the teaching staff in university, which should not be formal. In addition, author compares numbers of the higher-educational institutions in Ukraine and some other European countries – such as Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Spain, Italy, Hungary and Poland and analysed its effectiveness. Ukraine has a large number of universities, around 281. The lagers numbers have only Poland and Germany. The effectiveness of higher-educational universities is being varied from its scientific activities. In addition, approaches to assessing the activities of higher educational institutions in the \"TOP-200 Ukraine\" and foreign rankings, in particular, uniRank, QS, NatureIndex, have been analyzed. For example, uniRank ranking system refers to Ukrainian Higher Education-related Organizations those, which is not related to a higher-educational process, such as Ministry of a Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Culture, but does not refer National Agency for Higher Education Quality Assurance, which gives an accreditation to an educational programs of Hugher Education Universities. The orientation of these ratings to the scientific process is revealed, without focusing on student-centrism and education. In the author’s opinion, there should be criteria, which shows the feedback from the students about educational process and which reveals the quality of educational process. The substantiation of the possibilities for improving the efficiency of Ukrainian higher educational institutions with an orientation on student-centrism is provided.","PeriodicalId":115496,"journal":{"name":"International Humanitarian University Herald. Economics and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS IN A CONTEXT OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: CLASSIFICATION AND PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION\",\"authors\":\"Serhii Levchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.32841/2413-2675/2021-49-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the existing definitions of effectiveness in the context of higher education, both those provided by the English dictionary, and domestic and foreign researchers, based on which the types of effectiveness are grouped. In addition, this article shows the differences between given definitions – efficiency and effectiveness. Also, the article indicates some areas of reforming higher education, both domestic and foreign experience. According to the author and reviewed literature, there should be a motivational system for the teaching staff in university, which should not be formal. In addition, author compares numbers of the higher-educational institutions in Ukraine and some other European countries – such as Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Spain, Italy, Hungary and Poland and analysed its effectiveness. Ukraine has a large number of universities, around 281. The lagers numbers have only Poland and Germany. The effectiveness of higher-educational universities is being varied from its scientific activities. In addition, approaches to assessing the activities of higher educational institutions in the \\\"TOP-200 Ukraine\\\" and foreign rankings, in particular, uniRank, QS, NatureIndex, have been analyzed. For example, uniRank ranking system refers to Ukrainian Higher Education-related Organizations those, which is not related to a higher-educational process, such as Ministry of a Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Culture, but does not refer National Agency for Higher Education Quality Assurance, which gives an accreditation to an educational programs of Hugher Education Universities. The orientation of these ratings to the scientific process is revealed, without focusing on student-centrism and education. In the author’s opinion, there should be criteria, which shows the feedback from the students about educational process and which reveals the quality of educational process. The substantiation of the possibilities for improving the efficiency of Ukrainian higher educational institutions with an orientation on student-centrism is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Humanitarian University Herald. Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Humanitarian University Herald. Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32841/2413-2675/2021-49-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Humanitarian University Herald. Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32841/2413-2675/2021-49-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了现有的英语词典和国内外学者对高等教育中有效性的定义,并在此基础上对有效性的类型进行了分类。此外,本文还展示了给定定义之间的差异-效率和有效性。此外,文章还指出了高等教育改革的一些领域,以及国内外的经验。根据作者和文献综述,大学应该有一个激励教师的系统,不应该是正式的。此外,作者还比较了乌克兰与德国、波兰、捷克共和国、西班牙、意大利、匈牙利和波兰等欧洲国家高等教育机构的数量,并分析了其有效性。乌克兰有大量的大学,大约有281所。排名靠前的只有波兰和德国。高等教育大学的效益与它的科学活动是不同的。此外,还分析了评估“乌克兰前200名”和外国排名中高等教育机构活动的方法,特别是uniRank, QS, NatureIndex。例如,uniRank排名系统指的是乌克兰高等教育相关组织,这些组织与高等教育过程无关,如外交部,卫生部,文化部,但不涉及国家高等教育质量保证机构,该机构对高等教育大学的教育计划进行认证。这些评级对科学过程的取向被揭示出来,而没有关注以学生为中心和教育。笔者认为,应该有一个标准,反映学生对教育过程的反馈,揭示教育过程的质量。在以学生为中心的方针下,证明了提高乌克兰高等教育机构效率的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS IN A CONTEXT OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: CLASSIFICATION AND PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION
The article analyzes the existing definitions of effectiveness in the context of higher education, both those provided by the English dictionary, and domestic and foreign researchers, based on which the types of effectiveness are grouped. In addition, this article shows the differences between given definitions – efficiency and effectiveness. Also, the article indicates some areas of reforming higher education, both domestic and foreign experience. According to the author and reviewed literature, there should be a motivational system for the teaching staff in university, which should not be formal. In addition, author compares numbers of the higher-educational institutions in Ukraine and some other European countries – such as Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Spain, Italy, Hungary and Poland and analysed its effectiveness. Ukraine has a large number of universities, around 281. The lagers numbers have only Poland and Germany. The effectiveness of higher-educational universities is being varied from its scientific activities. In addition, approaches to assessing the activities of higher educational institutions in the "TOP-200 Ukraine" and foreign rankings, in particular, uniRank, QS, NatureIndex, have been analyzed. For example, uniRank ranking system refers to Ukrainian Higher Education-related Organizations those, which is not related to a higher-educational process, such as Ministry of a Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Culture, but does not refer National Agency for Higher Education Quality Assurance, which gives an accreditation to an educational programs of Hugher Education Universities. The orientation of these ratings to the scientific process is revealed, without focusing on student-centrism and education. In the author’s opinion, there should be criteria, which shows the feedback from the students about educational process and which reveals the quality of educational process. The substantiation of the possibilities for improving the efficiency of Ukrainian higher educational institutions with an orientation on student-centrism is provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信