第八章第2、3节部件表面亚表面缺陷替代UT缺陷评价及验收标准新规范案例的建议

S. Terada
{"title":"第八章第2、3节部件表面亚表面缺陷替代UT缺陷评价及验收标准新规范案例的建议","authors":"S. Terada","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The current proximity rules for subsurface flaws near the surfaces of component in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3 are different from those of Section XI. The current acceptance criteria of Sec. XI were revised in 2008 in order to eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws based on the research work by Dr. K. Hasegawa and Dr. K. Miyazaki el. The fracture mechanics evaluation for the current and proposed alternative acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near a component’s surfaces based on Section XI have been performed. The stress intensity factors for transformed surface flaws of the current acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near component’s surfaces are much larger and too conservative compared with the overall acceptance criteria. It is confirmed herein that the proposed alternative converting rules have enough fracture margin. Therefore, the safety level of this proposal is almost the same as that of the current code. The proposed alternative acceptance criteria may avoid unnecessary weld repairs, and eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws in the area near the component’s surface.","PeriodicalId":174920,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposal of New Code Case for Alternative UT Flaw Evaluation and Acceptance Criteria of Subsurface Flaw Near Component Surface in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3\",\"authors\":\"S. Terada\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2019-93105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The current proximity rules for subsurface flaws near the surfaces of component in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3 are different from those of Section XI. The current acceptance criteria of Sec. XI were revised in 2008 in order to eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws based on the research work by Dr. K. Hasegawa and Dr. K. Miyazaki el. The fracture mechanics evaluation for the current and proposed alternative acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near a component’s surfaces based on Section XI have been performed. The stress intensity factors for transformed surface flaws of the current acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near component’s surfaces are much larger and too conservative compared with the overall acceptance criteria. It is confirmed herein that the proposed alternative converting rules have enough fracture margin. Therefore, the safety level of this proposal is almost the same as that of the current code. The proposed alternative acceptance criteria may avoid unnecessary weld repairs, and eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws in the area near the component’s surface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于Dr. Hasegawa和Dr. K. Miyazaki el的研究工作,为了消除可接受和不可接受缺陷的不连续性,现行的第11章可接受标准于2008年进行了修订。现行构件表面亚表面缺陷验收标准中变形表面缺陷的应力强度因子较大,与整体验收标准相比过于保守。验证了所提出的替代转换规则具有足够的断裂裕度。因此,该提案的安全级别与现行规范的安全级别几乎相同。建议的替代验收标准可以避免不必要的焊接修补,并消除部件表面附近区域可接受和不可接受缺陷的不连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proposal of New Code Case for Alternative UT Flaw Evaluation and Acceptance Criteria of Subsurface Flaw Near Component Surface in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3
The current proximity rules for subsurface flaws near the surfaces of component in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3 are different from those of Section XI. The current acceptance criteria of Sec. XI were revised in 2008 in order to eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws based on the research work by Dr. K. Hasegawa and Dr. K. Miyazaki el. The fracture mechanics evaluation for the current and proposed alternative acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near a component’s surfaces based on Section XI have been performed. The stress intensity factors for transformed surface flaws of the current acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near component’s surfaces are much larger and too conservative compared with the overall acceptance criteria. It is confirmed herein that the proposed alternative converting rules have enough fracture margin. Therefore, the safety level of this proposal is almost the same as that of the current code. The proposed alternative acceptance criteria may avoid unnecessary weld repairs, and eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws in the area near the component’s surface.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信