基于小波梯度概念的无参考物镜模糊度量,大小边缘宽度

Soundararajan Ezekiel, K. Harrity, M. Alford, Erik Blasch, D. Ferris, A. Bubalo
{"title":"基于小波梯度概念的无参考物镜模糊度量,大小边缘宽度","authors":"Soundararajan Ezekiel, K. Harrity, M. Alford, Erik Blasch, D. Ferris, A. Bubalo","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.2014.7045788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past decade, the number and popularity of digital cameras has increased many fold, increasing the demand for a blur metric and quality assessment techniques to evaluate digital images. There is still no widely accepted industry standard by which an image's blur content may be assessed so it is imperative that better, more reliable, no-reference metrics be created to fill this gap. In this paper, a new wavelet based scheme is proposed as a blur metric. This method does not rely on subjective testing other than for verification. After applying the discrete wavelet transform to an image, we use adaptive thresholding to identify edge regions in the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal sub-images. For each sub-image, we utilize the fact that detected edges can be separated into connected components. We do this because, perceptually, blur is most apparent on edge regions. From these regions it is possible to compute properties of the edge such as length and width. The length and width can then be used to measure the area of a blurred region which in turn yields the number of blurred pixels for each connected region. Ideally, an edge point is represented by only a single pixel so if a found edge has a width greater than one it likely contains blur. In order to not skew our results, a one by n-length rectangle is removed from the computed blur area. The areas are summed which will represent the total blur pixel count per image. Using a series of test images, we determined the blur pixel ratio as the number of blur pixels to the total pixels in an image.","PeriodicalId":318539,"journal":{"name":"NAECON 2014 - IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No-reference objective blur metric based on the notion of wavelet gradient, magnitude edge width\",\"authors\":\"Soundararajan Ezekiel, K. Harrity, M. Alford, Erik Blasch, D. Ferris, A. Bubalo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAECON.2014.7045788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past decade, the number and popularity of digital cameras has increased many fold, increasing the demand for a blur metric and quality assessment techniques to evaluate digital images. There is still no widely accepted industry standard by which an image's blur content may be assessed so it is imperative that better, more reliable, no-reference metrics be created to fill this gap. In this paper, a new wavelet based scheme is proposed as a blur metric. This method does not rely on subjective testing other than for verification. After applying the discrete wavelet transform to an image, we use adaptive thresholding to identify edge regions in the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal sub-images. For each sub-image, we utilize the fact that detected edges can be separated into connected components. We do this because, perceptually, blur is most apparent on edge regions. From these regions it is possible to compute properties of the edge such as length and width. The length and width can then be used to measure the area of a blurred region which in turn yields the number of blurred pixels for each connected region. Ideally, an edge point is represented by only a single pixel so if a found edge has a width greater than one it likely contains blur. In order to not skew our results, a one by n-length rectangle is removed from the computed blur area. The areas are summed which will represent the total blur pixel count per image. Using a series of test images, we determined the blur pixel ratio as the number of blur pixels to the total pixels in an image.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NAECON 2014 - IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NAECON 2014 - IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.2014.7045788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAECON 2014 - IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.2014.7045788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在过去的十年中,数码相机的数量和普及程度增加了许多倍,增加了对模糊度量和质量评估技术的需求,以评估数字图像。目前还没有被广泛接受的行业标准来评估图像的模糊内容,因此必须创建更好、更可靠、无参考的指标来填补这一空白。本文提出了一种基于小波变换的模糊度量方法。该方法不依赖于除验证外的主观测试。在对图像应用离散小波变换后,我们使用自适应阈值法来识别水平、垂直和对角子图像中的边缘区域。对于每个子图像,我们利用检测到的边缘可以被分离成相互连接的组件的事实。我们这样做是因为,在感知上,模糊在边缘区域是最明显的。从这些区域可以计算边缘的属性,如长度和宽度。然后,所述长度和宽度可用于测量所述模糊区域的面积,所述模糊区域反过来产生每个连接区域的模糊像素的数目。理想情况下,一个边缘点只由一个像素表示,所以如果发现的边缘宽度大于1,它可能包含模糊。为了不扭曲我们的结果,从计算的模糊区域中移除一个1 × n长度的矩形。这些区域的总和将表示每个图像的总模糊像素数。使用一系列测试图像,我们确定了模糊像素比,即图像中模糊像素的数量与总像素的数量之比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No-reference objective blur metric based on the notion of wavelet gradient, magnitude edge width
In the past decade, the number and popularity of digital cameras has increased many fold, increasing the demand for a blur metric and quality assessment techniques to evaluate digital images. There is still no widely accepted industry standard by which an image's blur content may be assessed so it is imperative that better, more reliable, no-reference metrics be created to fill this gap. In this paper, a new wavelet based scheme is proposed as a blur metric. This method does not rely on subjective testing other than for verification. After applying the discrete wavelet transform to an image, we use adaptive thresholding to identify edge regions in the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal sub-images. For each sub-image, we utilize the fact that detected edges can be separated into connected components. We do this because, perceptually, blur is most apparent on edge regions. From these regions it is possible to compute properties of the edge such as length and width. The length and width can then be used to measure the area of a blurred region which in turn yields the number of blurred pixels for each connected region. Ideally, an edge point is represented by only a single pixel so if a found edge has a width greater than one it likely contains blur. In order to not skew our results, a one by n-length rectangle is removed from the computed blur area. The areas are summed which will represent the total blur pixel count per image. Using a series of test images, we determined the blur pixel ratio as the number of blur pixels to the total pixels in an image.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信