在2019年印尼总统和职业总统辩论中违反国家竞选团队原则和国家获胜机构。

Roli Stambo, Agustina Agustina, Winda Azmi
{"title":"在2019年印尼总统和职业总统辩论中违反国家竞选团队原则和国家获胜机构。","authors":"Roli Stambo, Agustina Agustina, Winda Azmi","doi":"10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Presidential and vice-presidential elections invite a lot of public attention, especially in the media expressed by the two different teams. Therefore, this research tries to see a form that replaces the principle of politeness in the speech of the National Campaign Teams and the National Candidate Body for Indonesia's 2019 presidential and vice-presidential candidates in a polemic on the online news portal. This study uses qualitative considerations with descriptive methods. Analyzing data uses Miles and Huberman's theory with three hi: reducing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. The results of the research show that who are more dominant politicians oppose the principles of politeness for the progress of others or the intended parties. Violation of the politeness principle occurs in six maxims. Of the six maxims in the politeness principle, the most violated are the maxims of praise and the least violated are the maxims of generosity and generosity..","PeriodicalId":177748,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Education, ICLLE 2019, 22-23 August, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia","volume":"9 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Violation of the national campaign teamsness principles and the national winning agency in the presidential and vocational presidential polemic of the 2019 president of Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Roli Stambo, Agustina Agustina, Winda Azmi\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Presidential and vice-presidential elections invite a lot of public attention, especially in the media expressed by the two different teams. Therefore, this research tries to see a form that replaces the principle of politeness in the speech of the National Campaign Teams and the National Candidate Body for Indonesia's 2019 presidential and vice-presidential candidates in a polemic on the online news portal. This study uses qualitative considerations with descriptive methods. Analyzing data uses Miles and Huberman's theory with three hi: reducing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. The results of the research show that who are more dominant politicians oppose the principles of politeness for the progress of others or the intended parties. Violation of the politeness principle occurs in six maxims. Of the six maxims in the politeness principle, the most violated are the maxims of praise and the least violated are the maxims of generosity and generosity..\",\"PeriodicalId\":177748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Education, ICLLE 2019, 22-23 August, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"9 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Education, ICLLE 2019, 22-23 August, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Education, ICLLE 2019, 22-23 August, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要总统和副总统选举吸引了很多公众的关注,特别是在两个不同团队表达的媒体上。因此,本研究试图在在线新闻门户网站的辩论中,在印度尼西亚2019年总统和副总统候选人的国家竞选团队和国家候选人机构的演讲中看到一种取代礼貌原则的形式。本研究采用定性考虑和描述性方法。分析数据使用迈尔斯和休伯曼的理论,有三个hi:减少数据,呈现数据和得出结论。研究结果表明,在政治上占主导地位的人往往会为了他人的进步或对方的进步而违背礼貌原则。违反礼貌原则的行为有六条。在礼貌原则的六条格言中,违反最多的是赞美格言,违反最少的是慷慨和慷慨格言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Violation of the national campaign teamsness principles and the national winning agency in the presidential and vocational presidential polemic of the 2019 president of Indonesia.
Abstract. Presidential and vice-presidential elections invite a lot of public attention, especially in the media expressed by the two different teams. Therefore, this research tries to see a form that replaces the principle of politeness in the speech of the National Campaign Teams and the National Candidate Body for Indonesia's 2019 presidential and vice-presidential candidates in a polemic on the online news portal. This study uses qualitative considerations with descriptive methods. Analyzing data uses Miles and Huberman's theory with three hi: reducing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. The results of the research show that who are more dominant politicians oppose the principles of politeness for the progress of others or the intended parties. Violation of the politeness principle occurs in six maxims. Of the six maxims in the politeness principle, the most violated are the maxims of praise and the least violated are the maxims of generosity and generosity..
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信