可用性评估:学习方法发现何时一致,何时不一致

Craig S. Miller
{"title":"可用性评估:学习方法发现何时一致,何时不一致","authors":"Craig S. Miller","doi":"10.1145/2808006.2808027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes student learning in the context of a methods-oriented human-computer interaction course. In this course, students conduct expert inspection methods and usability tests. They then compare their findings across the methods and with other evaluators. Student assessments of their assignments and solicited comments suggest how comparing findings helps them learn the relative benefits of each of the methods. Modifications to this approach are discussed for diverse courses where coverage of HCI content may be more limited.","PeriodicalId":431742,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability Evaluation: Learning When Method Findings Converge--And When They Don't\",\"authors\":\"Craig S. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2808006.2808027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes student learning in the context of a methods-oriented human-computer interaction course. In this course, students conduct expert inspection methods and usability tests. They then compare their findings across the methods and with other evaluators. Student assessments of their assignments and solicited comments suggest how comparing findings helps them learn the relative benefits of each of the methods. Modifications to this approach are discussed for diverse courses where coverage of HCI content may be more limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808006.2808027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808006.2808027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以一门以方法为导向的人机交互课程为背景,对学生的学习进行分析。在本课程中,学生进行专家检验方法和可用性测试。然后,他们将自己的发现与其他评估人员进行比较。学生对作业的评估和征求的意见表明,比较研究结果如何帮助他们了解每种方法的相对优势。本文讨论了不同课程对这种方法的修改,这些课程中HCI内容的覆盖范围可能更有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability Evaluation: Learning When Method Findings Converge--And When They Don't
This paper analyzes student learning in the context of a methods-oriented human-computer interaction course. In this course, students conduct expert inspection methods and usability tests. They then compare their findings across the methods and with other evaluators. Student assessments of their assignments and solicited comments suggest how comparing findings helps them learn the relative benefits of each of the methods. Modifications to this approach are discussed for diverse courses where coverage of HCI content may be more limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信