律师资格考试答题的两步级联文本蕴涵

Mi-Young Kim, R. Goebel
{"title":"律师资格考试答题的两步级联文本蕴涵","authors":"Mi-Young Kim, R. Goebel","doi":"10.1145/3086512.3086550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our legal question answering system combines legal information retrieval and textual entailment, and exploits semantic information using a logic-based representation. We have evaluated our system using the data from the competition on legal information extraction/entailment (COLIEE)-2017. The competition focuses on the legal information processing required to answer yes/no questions from Japanese legal bar exams, and it consists of two phases: ad hoc legal information retrieval (Phase 1), and textual entailment (Phase 2). Phase 1 requires the identification of Japan civil law articles relevant to a legal bar exam query. For this phase, we have used an information retrieval approach using TF-IDF combined with a simple language model. Phase 2 requires a yes/no decision for previously unseen queries, which we approach by comparing the approximate meanings of queries with relevant statutes. Our meaning extraction process uses a selection of features based on a kind of paraphrase, coupled with a condition/conclusion/exception analysis of articles and queries. We also extract and exploit negation patterns from the articles. We construct a logic-based representation as a semantic analysis result, and then classify questions into easy and difficult types by analyzing the logic representation. If a question is in our easy category, we simply obtain the entailment answer from the logic representation; otherwise we use an unsupervised learning method to obtain the entailment answer. Experimental evaluation shows that our result ranked highest in the Phase 2 amongst all COLIEE-2017 competitors.","PeriodicalId":425187,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-step cascaded textual entailment for legal bar exam question answering\",\"authors\":\"Mi-Young Kim, R. Goebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3086512.3086550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our legal question answering system combines legal information retrieval and textual entailment, and exploits semantic information using a logic-based representation. We have evaluated our system using the data from the competition on legal information extraction/entailment (COLIEE)-2017. The competition focuses on the legal information processing required to answer yes/no questions from Japanese legal bar exams, and it consists of two phases: ad hoc legal information retrieval (Phase 1), and textual entailment (Phase 2). Phase 1 requires the identification of Japan civil law articles relevant to a legal bar exam query. For this phase, we have used an information retrieval approach using TF-IDF combined with a simple language model. Phase 2 requires a yes/no decision for previously unseen queries, which we approach by comparing the approximate meanings of queries with relevant statutes. Our meaning extraction process uses a selection of features based on a kind of paraphrase, coupled with a condition/conclusion/exception analysis of articles and queries. We also extract and exploit negation patterns from the articles. We construct a logic-based representation as a semantic analysis result, and then classify questions into easy and difficult types by analyzing the logic representation. If a question is in our easy category, we simply obtain the entailment answer from the logic representation; otherwise we use an unsupervised learning method to obtain the entailment answer. Experimental evaluation shows that our result ranked highest in the Phase 2 amongst all COLIEE-2017 competitors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

我们的法律问答系统结合了法律信息检索和文本蕴涵,并使用基于逻辑的表示来利用语义信息。我们使用法律信息提取/蕴涵竞赛(COLIEE -2017)的数据评估了我们的系统。该竞赛侧重于回答日本律师资格考试中是/否问题所需的法律信息处理,包括两个阶段:临时法律信息检索(第一阶段)和文本蕴意(第二阶段)。第一阶段要求识别与法律律师资格考试查询相关的日本民法条款。在这个阶段,我们使用了一种使用TF-IDF和简单语言模型相结合的信息检索方法。阶段2需要对以前未见过的查询做出是/否的决定,我们通过将查询的近似含义与相关法规进行比较来实现。我们的意义提取过程使用基于一种释义的特征选择,再加上对文章和查询的条件/结论/异常分析。我们还从冠词中提取和利用否定模式。我们构建一个基于逻辑的表示作为语义分析结果,然后通过分析逻辑表示将问题分为易、难两类。如果一个问题属于我们的简单范畴,我们只需从逻辑表示中获得蕴涵答案;否则,我们使用无监督学习方法来获得蕴涵答案。实验评估表明,我们的结果在所有COLIEE-2017竞争对手中排名第一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two-step cascaded textual entailment for legal bar exam question answering
Our legal question answering system combines legal information retrieval and textual entailment, and exploits semantic information using a logic-based representation. We have evaluated our system using the data from the competition on legal information extraction/entailment (COLIEE)-2017. The competition focuses on the legal information processing required to answer yes/no questions from Japanese legal bar exams, and it consists of two phases: ad hoc legal information retrieval (Phase 1), and textual entailment (Phase 2). Phase 1 requires the identification of Japan civil law articles relevant to a legal bar exam query. For this phase, we have used an information retrieval approach using TF-IDF combined with a simple language model. Phase 2 requires a yes/no decision for previously unseen queries, which we approach by comparing the approximate meanings of queries with relevant statutes. Our meaning extraction process uses a selection of features based on a kind of paraphrase, coupled with a condition/conclusion/exception analysis of articles and queries. We also extract and exploit negation patterns from the articles. We construct a logic-based representation as a semantic analysis result, and then classify questions into easy and difficult types by analyzing the logic representation. If a question is in our easy category, we simply obtain the entailment answer from the logic representation; otherwise we use an unsupervised learning method to obtain the entailment answer. Experimental evaluation shows that our result ranked highest in the Phase 2 amongst all COLIEE-2017 competitors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信