{"title":"验证变量模型的反向测试方法","authors":"Kirit Vaniya, Ravi Gor","doi":"10.29121/ijoest.v6.i6.2022.408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Value at risk (VaR) is one of the important market risk measures. It measures the possible potential loss on given investment in terms of value, with certain probability for certain time horizon. In this paper, our aim is to discuss different back-testing approaches to validate VaR models, and also test it the real market data. We back tested VaR of Nifty 50 index obtained by Variance Co-variance method, Historical simulation method, Monte-Carlo simulation, and cubic polynomial regression method. We have used Total exceptions by binary back-testing over entire population. we have also used Basel Traffic Light Zone Test, Kupiec POF-test, Kupiec TUFF-test, and Haas’ Mixed-Kupiec test and analyzed the above methods.","PeriodicalId":331301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BACK-TESTING APPROACHES FOR VALIDATING VAR MODELS\",\"authors\":\"Kirit Vaniya, Ravi Gor\",\"doi\":\"10.29121/ijoest.v6.i6.2022.408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Value at risk (VaR) is one of the important market risk measures. It measures the possible potential loss on given investment in terms of value, with certain probability for certain time horizon. In this paper, our aim is to discuss different back-testing approaches to validate VaR models, and also test it the real market data. We back tested VaR of Nifty 50 index obtained by Variance Co-variance method, Historical simulation method, Monte-Carlo simulation, and cubic polynomial regression method. We have used Total exceptions by binary back-testing over entire population. we have also used Basel Traffic Light Zone Test, Kupiec POF-test, Kupiec TUFF-test, and Haas’ Mixed-Kupiec test and analyzed the above methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29121/ijoest.v6.i6.2022.408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29121/ijoest.v6.i6.2022.408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
风险价值(VaR)是衡量市场风险的重要指标之一。它以价值衡量给定投资的潜在损失,在一定的时间范围内具有一定的概率。在本文中,我们的目的是讨论不同的回测方法来验证VaR模型,并测试它的真实市场数据。对方差协方差法、历史模拟法、蒙特卡罗模拟法、三次多项式回归法得到的Nifty 50指数VaR进行了回验。我们通过对整个人口进行二元回测使用了总异常。我们还使用了Basel Traffic Light Zone Test、Kupiec pof Test、Kupiec TUFF-test和Haas’Mixed-Kupiec Test,并对上述方法进行了分析。
Value at risk (VaR) is one of the important market risk measures. It measures the possible potential loss on given investment in terms of value, with certain probability for certain time horizon. In this paper, our aim is to discuss different back-testing approaches to validate VaR models, and also test it the real market data. We back tested VaR of Nifty 50 index obtained by Variance Co-variance method, Historical simulation method, Monte-Carlo simulation, and cubic polynomial regression method. We have used Total exceptions by binary back-testing over entire population. we have also used Basel Traffic Light Zone Test, Kupiec POF-test, Kupiec TUFF-test, and Haas’ Mixed-Kupiec test and analyzed the above methods.