Gleitender Übergang in die Rente durch Flexibilisierung der Teilrente(逐步过渡到灵活的部分退休)

Martin Gasche, C. Krolage
{"title":"Gleitender Übergang in die Rente durch Flexibilisierung der Teilrente(逐步过渡到灵活的部分退休)","authors":"Martin Gasche, C. Krolage","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2006439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the background of the increasing legal retirement age, broader opportunities for a smooth transition to retirement are often demanded for elderly workers who are disinclined or unable to continue working full-time. This study compares different options for a transition to retirement. It becomes evident that from an insurant’s point of view, the far more popular option for early retirement called 'Altersteilzeit' has no significant advantages in comparison to the barely known partial retirement (Teilrente). The biggest disadvantages of partial retirement are the three fixed pension levels (Teilrentenstufen) and the intricate calculation of supplementary income limits. Abolishing fixed pension levels might make partial retirement and earning supplementary income significantly more attractive, possibly superseding the Altersteilzeit option. Our proposed flexible partial retirement (flexible Teilrente) is compared to the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affair’s proposition called 'Kombirente.'","PeriodicalId":253435,"journal":{"name":"Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) Discussion Paper Series","volume":"129 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gleitender Übergang in die Rente durch Flexibilisierung der Teilrente (Gradual Transition to Retirement with Flexible Partial Retirement)\",\"authors\":\"Martin Gasche, C. Krolage\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2006439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Against the background of the increasing legal retirement age, broader opportunities for a smooth transition to retirement are often demanded for elderly workers who are disinclined or unable to continue working full-time. This study compares different options for a transition to retirement. It becomes evident that from an insurant’s point of view, the far more popular option for early retirement called 'Altersteilzeit' has no significant advantages in comparison to the barely known partial retirement (Teilrente). The biggest disadvantages of partial retirement are the three fixed pension levels (Teilrentenstufen) and the intricate calculation of supplementary income limits. Abolishing fixed pension levels might make partial retirement and earning supplementary income significantly more attractive, possibly superseding the Altersteilzeit option. Our proposed flexible partial retirement (flexible Teilrente) is compared to the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affair’s proposition called 'Kombirente.'\",\"PeriodicalId\":253435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) Discussion Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"129 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) Discussion Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2006439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) Discussion Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2006439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在法定退休年龄不断提高的背景下,往往要求不愿或不能继续全职工作的老年工人有更广泛的机会顺利过渡到退休。这项研究比较了向退休过渡的不同选择。很明显,从被保险人的角度来看,更受欢迎的提前退休选择“替代时代”与鲜为人知的部分退休(Teilrente)相比没有明显的优势。部分退休的最大缺点是三种固定的养老金水平(Teilrentenstufen)和补充收入限额的复杂计算。取消固定的养老金水平可能会使部分退休和赚取补充收入的吸引力大大增强,可能会取代替代时代的选择。我们提出的灵活部分退休(flexible Teilrente)与联邦劳动和社会事务部提出的“Kombirente”进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gleitender Übergang in die Rente durch Flexibilisierung der Teilrente (Gradual Transition to Retirement with Flexible Partial Retirement)
Against the background of the increasing legal retirement age, broader opportunities for a smooth transition to retirement are often demanded for elderly workers who are disinclined or unable to continue working full-time. This study compares different options for a transition to retirement. It becomes evident that from an insurant’s point of view, the far more popular option for early retirement called 'Altersteilzeit' has no significant advantages in comparison to the barely known partial retirement (Teilrente). The biggest disadvantages of partial retirement are the three fixed pension levels (Teilrentenstufen) and the intricate calculation of supplementary income limits. Abolishing fixed pension levels might make partial retirement and earning supplementary income significantly more attractive, possibly superseding the Altersteilzeit option. Our proposed flexible partial retirement (flexible Teilrente) is compared to the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affair’s proposition called 'Kombirente.'
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信