解决问题的技术有效,提高批判性思维技能

Susi Diriyanti Novalina, Tiara Sylvia, Liber Tommy Hutabarat
{"title":"解决问题的技术有效,提高批判性思维技能","authors":"Susi Diriyanti Novalina, Tiara Sylvia, Liber Tommy Hutabarat","doi":"10.24114/icp.v2i1.31738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the factors less successful learning process in the classroom is that lecturers are less innovative in applying learning methods. Lecturers still use the classical method of discussion. For that, a learning innovation is needed by applying problem solving methods. The study used quasi experimental design. The research population is medan aviation polytechnic cadets amounting to 40 cadets consisting of 20 people control group and 20 people experimental group. The data collection techniques used include interviews, observations, questionnaires, and tests. The statistical analysis used is Pearson ProductMoment to test validity, Cronbach'sAlpha to test reliability, Lilliefors to test normality,Levene's to test homogeneity, and t test and to test differences and effectiveness. Based on the results of the difference hypothesis test using independent samples t test,critical thinking ability data shows the value of tcalculated>ttable (3,740 > 1,998) with a level of significance (0.000 < 0.05) and the value of cadet learning results shows the value of tcount>ttable (3,656 > 1.998) with a significance level of less than 0.05 (0.001 < 0.05). Meanwhile, the results of the effectiveness hypothesis test using one sample t test,critical thinking ability data showeda table >ttvalue (5,724 > 2.037) with a significance level of < 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05) and a cadet learning value showing a>ttable t value (6,009 > 2,037) with a significance level (0.000 < 0.05). So, it can be concluded that there is a difference in critical thinking skills and learning outcomes between those who use problem solving methods and those who use discussion methods. Problem solving methods are effective in improving critical thinking skills and learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":255078,"journal":{"name":"INDONESIAN COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFEKTIVITAS TEKNIK PROBLEM SOLVING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS (CRITICAL THINKING) TARUNA\",\"authors\":\"Susi Diriyanti Novalina, Tiara Sylvia, Liber Tommy Hutabarat\",\"doi\":\"10.24114/icp.v2i1.31738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the factors less successful learning process in the classroom is that lecturers are less innovative in applying learning methods. Lecturers still use the classical method of discussion. For that, a learning innovation is needed by applying problem solving methods. The study used quasi experimental design. The research population is medan aviation polytechnic cadets amounting to 40 cadets consisting of 20 people control group and 20 people experimental group. The data collection techniques used include interviews, observations, questionnaires, and tests. The statistical analysis used is Pearson ProductMoment to test validity, Cronbach'sAlpha to test reliability, Lilliefors to test normality,Levene's to test homogeneity, and t test and to test differences and effectiveness. Based on the results of the difference hypothesis test using independent samples t test,critical thinking ability data shows the value of tcalculated>ttable (3,740 > 1,998) with a level of significance (0.000 < 0.05) and the value of cadet learning results shows the value of tcount>ttable (3,656 > 1.998) with a significance level of less than 0.05 (0.001 < 0.05). Meanwhile, the results of the effectiveness hypothesis test using one sample t test,critical thinking ability data showeda table >ttvalue (5,724 > 2.037) with a significance level of < 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05) and a cadet learning value showing a>ttable t value (6,009 > 2,037) with a significance level (0.000 < 0.05). So, it can be concluded that there is a difference in critical thinking skills and learning outcomes between those who use problem solving methods and those who use discussion methods. Problem solving methods are effective in improving critical thinking skills and learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INDONESIAN COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INDONESIAN COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24114/icp.v2i1.31738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDONESIAN COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/icp.v2i1.31738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

课堂学习过程不成功的因素之一是讲师在应用学习方法方面缺乏创新。讲师们仍然使用经典的讨论方法。为此,需要运用解决问题的方法进行学习创新。本研究采用准实验设计。研究对象为中部航空职业技术学院40名学员,其中对照组20人,实验组20人。使用的数据收集技术包括访谈、观察、问卷调查和测试。统计分析采用Pearson ProductMoment检验效度,Cronbach’s salpha检验信度,Lilliefors检验正态性,Levene检验同质性,t检验检验差异和有效性。根据采用独立样本t检验的差异假设检验结果,批判性思维能力数据tcount>表值(3740 > 1998)具有显著性水平(0.000 < 0.05),学员学习结果tcount>表值(3656 > 1.998)具有显著性水平< 0.05(0.001 < 0.05)。同时,有效性假设检验结果采用单样本t检验,批判性思维能力数据显示表>t值(5,724 > 2.037),显著性水平< 0.05(0.000 < 0.05);学员学习价值显示表>t值(6,009 > 2,037),显著性水平为0.000 < 0.05。因此,可以得出结论,使用问题解决方法的学生和使用讨论方法的学生在批判性思维技能和学习成果方面存在差异。解决问题的方法在提高批判性思维技能和学习成果方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFEKTIVITAS TEKNIK PROBLEM SOLVING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS (CRITICAL THINKING) TARUNA
One of the factors less successful learning process in the classroom is that lecturers are less innovative in applying learning methods. Lecturers still use the classical method of discussion. For that, a learning innovation is needed by applying problem solving methods. The study used quasi experimental design. The research population is medan aviation polytechnic cadets amounting to 40 cadets consisting of 20 people control group and 20 people experimental group. The data collection techniques used include interviews, observations, questionnaires, and tests. The statistical analysis used is Pearson ProductMoment to test validity, Cronbach'sAlpha to test reliability, Lilliefors to test normality,Levene's to test homogeneity, and t test and to test differences and effectiveness. Based on the results of the difference hypothesis test using independent samples t test,critical thinking ability data shows the value of tcalculated>ttable (3,740 > 1,998) with a level of significance (0.000 < 0.05) and the value of cadet learning results shows the value of tcount>ttable (3,656 > 1.998) with a significance level of less than 0.05 (0.001 < 0.05). Meanwhile, the results of the effectiveness hypothesis test using one sample t test,critical thinking ability data showeda table >ttvalue (5,724 > 2.037) with a significance level of < 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05) and a cadet learning value showing a>ttable t value (6,009 > 2,037) with a significance level (0.000 < 0.05). So, it can be concluded that there is a difference in critical thinking skills and learning outcomes between those who use problem solving methods and those who use discussion methods. Problem solving methods are effective in improving critical thinking skills and learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信