重点纠正反馈与意义协商:学生书面语言准确性及其感知

Flora Flora
{"title":"重点纠正反馈与意义协商:学生书面语言准确性及其感知","authors":"Flora Flora","doi":"10.30845/ijll.v7n2p11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is designed to investigate :1) students’ written language accuracy, 2) effectiveness of teacher’s indirect corrective feedback in enhancing students’ written language accuracy, 3) effectiveness of negotiation of meaning during direct peer corrective feedback , and 4) the students’ perception after the implementation of focused corrective feedback and negotiation of meaning. In enhancing students’ written language accuracy, indirect corrective feedback in the form of codes, and peer direct corrective feedback in the form of explanation were applied to 24 students of English Education Faculty (FKIP) of the University of Lampung who took Pre-intermediate writing class. The design was descriptive quantitative. The results demonstrate that ; (1) language accruracy on grammar is considered low but not on vocabulary and spelling, 2) indirect corrective feedback works well only if the students’ have prior linguistic ability, 3) direct corrective feedback works well because peer (s) did negotiation of meaning in forms of clarification , and 4) students have various response during the corrective feedback. The finding was discussed on the basis of relevant theories.","PeriodicalId":409958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focused Corrective Feedback and Negotiation of Meaning: Students’ Written Language Accuracy and Their Perception\",\"authors\":\"Flora Flora\",\"doi\":\"10.30845/ijll.v7n2p11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is designed to investigate :1) students’ written language accuracy, 2) effectiveness of teacher’s indirect corrective feedback in enhancing students’ written language accuracy, 3) effectiveness of negotiation of meaning during direct peer corrective feedback , and 4) the students’ perception after the implementation of focused corrective feedback and negotiation of meaning. In enhancing students’ written language accuracy, indirect corrective feedback in the form of codes, and peer direct corrective feedback in the form of explanation were applied to 24 students of English Education Faculty (FKIP) of the University of Lampung who took Pre-intermediate writing class. The design was descriptive quantitative. The results demonstrate that ; (1) language accruracy on grammar is considered low but not on vocabulary and spelling, 2) indirect corrective feedback works well only if the students’ have prior linguistic ability, 3) direct corrective feedback works well because peer (s) did negotiation of meaning in forms of clarification , and 4) students have various response during the corrective feedback. The finding was discussed on the basis of relevant theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v7n2p11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v7n2p11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在调查:1)学生的书面语言准确性,2)教师间接纠正反馈对提高学生书面语言准确性的有效性,3)同伴直接纠正反馈中意义协商的有效性,以及4)实施集中纠正反馈和意义协商后学生的感知。为了提高学生的书面语言准确性,本研究采用代码形式的间接纠正反馈和解释形式的同伴直接纠正反馈对24名参加中级前写作课程的楠蓬大学英语教育学院学生进行了研究。设计是描述性定量的。结果表明:(1)语法上的语言准确性较低,词汇和拼写上的语言准确性较低;(2)间接纠正反馈只有在学生有语言能力的情况下才有效果;(3)直接纠正反馈因为同伴以澄清的形式进行了意义协商而有效果;在相关理论的基础上对这一发现进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Focused Corrective Feedback and Negotiation of Meaning: Students’ Written Language Accuracy and Their Perception
This study is designed to investigate :1) students’ written language accuracy, 2) effectiveness of teacher’s indirect corrective feedback in enhancing students’ written language accuracy, 3) effectiveness of negotiation of meaning during direct peer corrective feedback , and 4) the students’ perception after the implementation of focused corrective feedback and negotiation of meaning. In enhancing students’ written language accuracy, indirect corrective feedback in the form of codes, and peer direct corrective feedback in the form of explanation were applied to 24 students of English Education Faculty (FKIP) of the University of Lampung who took Pre-intermediate writing class. The design was descriptive quantitative. The results demonstrate that ; (1) language accruracy on grammar is considered low but not on vocabulary and spelling, 2) indirect corrective feedback works well only if the students’ have prior linguistic ability, 3) direct corrective feedback works well because peer (s) did negotiation of meaning in forms of clarification , and 4) students have various response during the corrective feedback. The finding was discussed on the basis of relevant theories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信