普里皮亚季河流域水文数据空间插值方法比较——以乌克兰为例

K. Sokolchuk, M. Sokáč
{"title":"普里皮亚季河流域水文数据空间插值方法比较——以乌克兰为例","authors":"K. Sokolchuk, M. Sokáč","doi":"10.31577/ahs-2022-0023.02.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers four methods of spatial interpolation: method of inverse weighted distances (IDW), triangulation (TIN), Spline interpolation and Kriging. The Pripyat basin was chosen as the study area, and the regularities of the spatial distribution of hydrological characteristics across the territory were assessed. For this territory, maps of spatial distribution of the specific discharge by four chosen methods were created; the accuracy of the obtained results was assessed. Based on the results of the work it was determined that the IDW method with a distance coefficient P=2 gives better results for the generalization of hydrological data over the studied area. The next most reliable methods are Kriging, which shows small errors, and Spline, with smooth transitions. The least suitable among the studied methods is TIN method. To study boundaries and territories that are outside the boundaries defined by GIS based on input data, in this case – Pripyat basin, IDW method is recommended to use, while every other can be used to study the central part of the catchment, with different reliability for the boundary territories.","PeriodicalId":321483,"journal":{"name":"Acta Hydrologica Slovaca","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of spatial interpolation methods of hydrological data on example of the Pripyat river basin (within Ukraine)\",\"authors\":\"K. Sokolchuk, M. Sokáč\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/ahs-2022-0023.02.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article considers four methods of spatial interpolation: method of inverse weighted distances (IDW), triangulation (TIN), Spline interpolation and Kriging. The Pripyat basin was chosen as the study area, and the regularities of the spatial distribution of hydrological characteristics across the territory were assessed. For this territory, maps of spatial distribution of the specific discharge by four chosen methods were created; the accuracy of the obtained results was assessed. Based on the results of the work it was determined that the IDW method with a distance coefficient P=2 gives better results for the generalization of hydrological data over the studied area. The next most reliable methods are Kriging, which shows small errors, and Spline, with smooth transitions. The least suitable among the studied methods is TIN method. To study boundaries and territories that are outside the boundaries defined by GIS based on input data, in this case – Pripyat basin, IDW method is recommended to use, while every other can be used to study the central part of the catchment, with different reliability for the boundary territories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Hydrologica Slovaca\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Hydrologica Slovaca\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/ahs-2022-0023.02.0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Hydrologica Slovaca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/ahs-2022-0023.02.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了四种空间插值方法:逆加权距离法(IDW)、三角剖分法(TIN)、样条插值法和克里格插值法。选取普里皮亚季流域为研究区,评价流域水文特征空间分布规律。对于这一地区,采用四种选定的方法绘制了具体排放量的空间分布图;对所得结果的准确性进行了评估。研究结果表明,距离系数P=2的IDW方法对研究区水文资料的概化效果较好。其次最可靠的方法是误差较小的克里格法和平滑过渡的样条法。在所研究的方法中,最不适合的是TIN法。基于输入数据研究GIS定义的边界之外的边界和领土,在本例中- Pripyat流域,建议使用IDW方法,而其他方法都可以用于研究集水区的中心部分,边界领土的可靠性不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of spatial interpolation methods of hydrological data on example of the Pripyat river basin (within Ukraine)
The article considers four methods of spatial interpolation: method of inverse weighted distances (IDW), triangulation (TIN), Spline interpolation and Kriging. The Pripyat basin was chosen as the study area, and the regularities of the spatial distribution of hydrological characteristics across the territory were assessed. For this territory, maps of spatial distribution of the specific discharge by four chosen methods were created; the accuracy of the obtained results was assessed. Based on the results of the work it was determined that the IDW method with a distance coefficient P=2 gives better results for the generalization of hydrological data over the studied area. The next most reliable methods are Kriging, which shows small errors, and Spline, with smooth transitions. The least suitable among the studied methods is TIN method. To study boundaries and territories that are outside the boundaries defined by GIS based on input data, in this case – Pripyat basin, IDW method is recommended to use, while every other can be used to study the central part of the catchment, with different reliability for the boundary territories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信