{"title":"Bāb Sakrah al-Maut: Doktrin “Sakratulmaut” dalam Tradisi Islam di Nusantara dan Pengaruh Penghayatan-penghayatan Spiritual Najm al-Dīn al-Kubrá","authors":"Muhammad Tarobin","doi":"10.37014/JUMANTARA.V12I1.1159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bāb Sakrah al-Maut (BSM) is a manuscript which so far has copies in various places, including: Aceh, Jakarta, Cirebon (West Java), and Sragen (Central Java). The manuscript is also written in various languages: Arabic, Javanese-Cirebon, and Malay. A study of this text is important to show that the sakratulmaut discourse which developed in the Islamic tradition on the Archipelago is an alternative discourse to the doctrine of \"kalěpasan\" which developed in the Śiwa-Buddhist and Islamic Javanese traditions. This study aims to: first, make a comparison to the study of Ahmad Wahyu Sudrajad who called this manuscript as a single manuscript, entitled Sakaratul Maut and written by Sheikh Imam Tabri bin Muhammad Khassan Besari in the middle of the XIX century. Second, making comparisons with the Serat Dewaruci and Fawā'iḥ al-Jamāl wa Fawātiḥ al-Jalāl texts. This was done to examine the characteristics of the sakratulmaut discourse in the BSM text and to test the opinion of Martin van Bruinessen who said that Syarif Hidayatullah had a connection with the Kubrawiah sufi order. Based on the philological and intertextual approaches, this study finds that: first, five BSM manuscripts have been found so far and it is strongly suspected that Syekh Imam Tabri was only a BSM manuscript copyist from existing manuscripts. Second, the comparison between the BSM text, the Serat Dewaruci and Fawā'iḥ al-Jamāl wa Fawātiḥ al-Jalāl text shows that the sakratulmaut discourse in the BSM text is dominated by the similarities with the occult views of Najm al-Dīn al-Kubrá. This led to the assumption that the BSM text was composed by figures in the circles of Syarif Hidayatullah (d. 1568 AD) and Syams al-Dīn al-Sumaṭrā'ī (d. 1630 AD).","PeriodicalId":213617,"journal":{"name":"Jumantara: Jurnal Manuskrip Nusantara","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jumantara: Jurnal Manuskrip Nusantara","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37014/JUMANTARA.V12I1.1159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Bāb Sakrah al-Maut (BSM)是一份手稿,迄今为止在不同的地方都有抄本,包括:亚齐、雅加达、西爪哇(Cirebon)和中爪哇(Sragen)。手稿也用不同的语言写成:阿拉伯语、爪哇语和马来语。对这篇文章的研究很重要,它表明在群岛的伊斯兰传统中发展起来的sakratulmaut话语是在Śiwa-Buddhist和伊斯兰爪哇传统中发展起来的“kalupasan”教义的替代话语。本研究的目的是:首先,与Ahmad Wahyu Sudrajad的研究进行比较,Ahmad Wahyu Sudrajad将该手稿称为单一手稿,名为Sakaratul Maut,由Sheikh Imam Tabri bin Muhammad kassan Besari在19世纪中叶撰写。第二,与Serat Dewaruci和fawwa ' ijah al-Jamāl wa Fawātiḥ al-Jalāl文本进行比较。这样做是为了检查BSM文本中sakratulmaut话语的特征,并测试Martin van Bruinessen的观点,他说Syarif Hidayatullah与Kubrawiah苏菲派有联系。基于文献学和互文方法,本研究发现:首先,迄今为止发现的五份BSM手稿,强烈怀疑Syekh Imam Tabri只是现有手稿的BSM手稿抄写员。其次,将BSM文本与Serat Dewaruci和fawha ' iama al-Jamāl wa Fawātiḥ al-Jalāl文本进行比较,可以发现BSM文本中的sakratulmaut话语主要与Najm al- d n al- kubr的神秘主义观点相似。这导致了一种假设,即BSM文本是由Syarif Hidayatullah(公元1568年)和Syams al- d n al-Sumaṭrā' ' '(公元1630年)圈子中的人物撰写的。
Bāb Sakrah al-Maut: Doktrin “Sakratulmaut” dalam Tradisi Islam di Nusantara dan Pengaruh Penghayatan-penghayatan Spiritual Najm al-Dīn al-Kubrá
Bāb Sakrah al-Maut (BSM) is a manuscript which so far has copies in various places, including: Aceh, Jakarta, Cirebon (West Java), and Sragen (Central Java). The manuscript is also written in various languages: Arabic, Javanese-Cirebon, and Malay. A study of this text is important to show that the sakratulmaut discourse which developed in the Islamic tradition on the Archipelago is an alternative discourse to the doctrine of "kalěpasan" which developed in the Śiwa-Buddhist and Islamic Javanese traditions. This study aims to: first, make a comparison to the study of Ahmad Wahyu Sudrajad who called this manuscript as a single manuscript, entitled Sakaratul Maut and written by Sheikh Imam Tabri bin Muhammad Khassan Besari in the middle of the XIX century. Second, making comparisons with the Serat Dewaruci and Fawā'iḥ al-Jamāl wa Fawātiḥ al-Jalāl texts. This was done to examine the characteristics of the sakratulmaut discourse in the BSM text and to test the opinion of Martin van Bruinessen who said that Syarif Hidayatullah had a connection with the Kubrawiah sufi order. Based on the philological and intertextual approaches, this study finds that: first, five BSM manuscripts have been found so far and it is strongly suspected that Syekh Imam Tabri was only a BSM manuscript copyist from existing manuscripts. Second, the comparison between the BSM text, the Serat Dewaruci and Fawā'iḥ al-Jamāl wa Fawātiḥ al-Jalāl text shows that the sakratulmaut discourse in the BSM text is dominated by the similarities with the occult views of Najm al-Dīn al-Kubrá. This led to the assumption that the BSM text was composed by figures in the circles of Syarif Hidayatullah (d. 1568 AD) and Syams al-Dīn al-Sumaṭrā'ī (d. 1630 AD).