光源类型对OPC精度的影响研究

Lithography Asia Pub Date : 2009-12-03 DOI:10.1117/12.837224
Kiho Yang, Daejin Park, Jeonkyu Lee, Sang-jin Oh, Jin-hyuck Jeon, Taejun You, Chan-ha Park, D. Yim, Sung-ki Park
{"title":"光源类型对OPC精度的影响研究","authors":"Kiho Yang, Daejin Park, Jeonkyu Lee, Sang-jin Oh, Jin-hyuck Jeon, Taejun You, Chan-ha Park, D. Yim, Sung-ki Park","doi":"10.1117/12.837224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of OPC (Optical Proximity Correction) model that well predict the wafer result has been researched. As the pattern design shrink down, the need for the CD (Critical Dimension) controllability increased more than before. To achieve these requirements, OPC models must be accurate for full chip process and model inaccuracies are one of several factors which contribute to errors in the final wafer image. For that reason, robust OPC using real lithographic terms was proposed. Real lithographic system is quite different from ideal system that is used for OPC modeling. Until now, this difference was acceptable since pattern size used for OPC model was large, but as device size shrinks, this gap between ideal and real system causes degradation of OPC accuracy. So, various optical parameters such as apodization, laser band width, degree of polarization, illumination are used today in order to compensate for this issue. Especially, major issue in modeling error is related to how the illumination source is used. For this study we assess accuracy of optical model for robust OPC using ideal and actual illumination sources, and test conditions are as follows: 1) We examined the difference of pupil types to output model respectively; 2) A parameterized test pattern layout was used by 1D test pattern types that have various lines and spaces; 3) All models were calculated in automation method so as to exclude the dependency of user skills; 4) OPC accuracies were examined by gate layer patterns on full chip level. The study is performed for 5X~4Xnm nodes lithographic processes. The main focus of the study was on usability of model that is made by measured source data in semiconductor manufacturing. Results clearly showed that the actual source for the optical model has merits and demerits.","PeriodicalId":383504,"journal":{"name":"Lithography Asia","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of OPC accuracy by illumination source types\",\"authors\":\"Kiho Yang, Daejin Park, Jeonkyu Lee, Sang-jin Oh, Jin-hyuck Jeon, Taejun You, Chan-ha Park, D. Yim, Sung-ki Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.837224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of OPC (Optical Proximity Correction) model that well predict the wafer result has been researched. As the pattern design shrink down, the need for the CD (Critical Dimension) controllability increased more than before. To achieve these requirements, OPC models must be accurate for full chip process and model inaccuracies are one of several factors which contribute to errors in the final wafer image. For that reason, robust OPC using real lithographic terms was proposed. Real lithographic system is quite different from ideal system that is used for OPC modeling. Until now, this difference was acceptable since pattern size used for OPC model was large, but as device size shrinks, this gap between ideal and real system causes degradation of OPC accuracy. So, various optical parameters such as apodization, laser band width, degree of polarization, illumination are used today in order to compensate for this issue. Especially, major issue in modeling error is related to how the illumination source is used. For this study we assess accuracy of optical model for robust OPC using ideal and actual illumination sources, and test conditions are as follows: 1) We examined the difference of pupil types to output model respectively; 2) A parameterized test pattern layout was used by 1D test pattern types that have various lines and spaces; 3) All models were calculated in automation method so as to exclude the dependency of user skills; 4) OPC accuracies were examined by gate layer patterns on full chip level. The study is performed for 5X~4Xnm nodes lithographic processes. The main focus of the study was on usability of model that is made by measured source data in semiconductor manufacturing. Results clearly showed that the actual source for the optical model has merits and demerits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lithography Asia\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lithography Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.837224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithography Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.837224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

研究了能较好地预测晶圆结果的OPC (Optical Proximity Correction)模型。随着模式设计的缩小,对CD(关键维度)可控性的需求比以前增加了很多。为了达到这些要求,OPC模型必须对整个芯片工艺精确,而模型不精确是导致最终晶圆图像误差的几个因素之一。为此,提出了使用真实光刻术语的鲁棒OPC。实际的光刻系统与OPC建模的理想系统有很大的不同。到目前为止,这种差异是可以接受的,因为用于OPC模型的模式尺寸很大,但随着设备尺寸的缩小,理想系统和实际系统之间的这种差距会导致OPC精度的降低。因此,为了弥补这一问题,今天使用了各种光学参数,如离光量、激光带宽、偏振度、照度等。特别是,建模误差的主要问题与如何使用照明光源有关。本研究采用理想光源和实际光源对鲁棒OPC光学模型的精度进行了评估,测试条件如下:1)分别考察了瞳孔类型与输出模型的差异;2)采用参数化的试验图布局方式,对具有多种线和空格的一维试验图进行布置;3)所有模型均采用自动化方法计算,排除了用户技能的依赖性;4)在全芯片水平上通过栅极层模式检测OPC精度。研究是在5X~4Xnm节点光刻工艺下进行的。研究的主要重点是在半导体制造测量源数据模型的可用性。结果清楚地表明,实际光源的光学模型有优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of OPC accuracy by illumination source types
The study of OPC (Optical Proximity Correction) model that well predict the wafer result has been researched. As the pattern design shrink down, the need for the CD (Critical Dimension) controllability increased more than before. To achieve these requirements, OPC models must be accurate for full chip process and model inaccuracies are one of several factors which contribute to errors in the final wafer image. For that reason, robust OPC using real lithographic terms was proposed. Real lithographic system is quite different from ideal system that is used for OPC modeling. Until now, this difference was acceptable since pattern size used for OPC model was large, but as device size shrinks, this gap between ideal and real system causes degradation of OPC accuracy. So, various optical parameters such as apodization, laser band width, degree of polarization, illumination are used today in order to compensate for this issue. Especially, major issue in modeling error is related to how the illumination source is used. For this study we assess accuracy of optical model for robust OPC using ideal and actual illumination sources, and test conditions are as follows: 1) We examined the difference of pupil types to output model respectively; 2) A parameterized test pattern layout was used by 1D test pattern types that have various lines and spaces; 3) All models were calculated in automation method so as to exclude the dependency of user skills; 4) OPC accuracies were examined by gate layer patterns on full chip level. The study is performed for 5X~4Xnm nodes lithographic processes. The main focus of the study was on usability of model that is made by measured source data in semiconductor manufacturing. Results clearly showed that the actual source for the optical model has merits and demerits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信