BPS男女同性恋心理学组2003年研究生奖得主男女同性恋学员:个人与职业融合的挑战

C. Butler
{"title":"BPS男女同性恋心理学组2003年研究生奖得主男女同性恋学员:个人与职业融合的挑战","authors":"C. Butler","doi":"10.53841/bpslg.2004.5.1.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how lesbian and gay clinical psychology trainees attempted to integrate their personal identity with their developing professional identity. Three gay and six lesbian trainees were recruited by snowball sampling and via a lesbian and gay student website. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and interview transcripts were analysed using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. A number of themes were identified relating to the dilemmas of personal and professional integration. Participants’ knowledge and experience of lesbian and gay issues created tensions between holding specialist knowledge and being a student, which were managed by monitoring disclosure. Further barriers for personal and professional integration included a lack of staff support and displays of anti-lesbian/gay sentiment by course staff, supervisors, lecturers and peers. These findings suggest that courses have yet to meet the British Psychological Society’s (2002) accreditation guidelines, which encourage diversity within trainee cohorts and the facilitation of personal and professional integration. Guidelines for course development and directions for future research are presented.","PeriodicalId":311409,"journal":{"name":"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BPS Lesbian & Gay Psychology Section 2003 Postgraduate Prize Winner Lesbian and gay trainees: The challenges of personal and professional integration\",\"authors\":\"C. Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpslg.2004.5.1.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores how lesbian and gay clinical psychology trainees attempted to integrate their personal identity with their developing professional identity. Three gay and six lesbian trainees were recruited by snowball sampling and via a lesbian and gay student website. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and interview transcripts were analysed using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. A number of themes were identified relating to the dilemmas of personal and professional integration. Participants’ knowledge and experience of lesbian and gay issues created tensions between holding specialist knowledge and being a student, which were managed by monitoring disclosure. Further barriers for personal and professional integration included a lack of staff support and displays of anti-lesbian/gay sentiment by course staff, supervisors, lecturers and peers. These findings suggest that courses have yet to meet the British Psychological Society’s (2002) accreditation guidelines, which encourage diversity within trainee cohorts and the facilitation of personal and professional integration. Guidelines for course development and directions for future research are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpslg.2004.5.1.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpslg.2004.5.1.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文探讨了女同性恋和男同性恋临床心理学学员如何尝试将他们的个人认同与他们正在发展的职业认同整合起来。三名男同性恋和六名女同性恋学员通过滚雪球抽样和一个女同性恋和男同性恋学生网站被招募。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用解释性现象学分析分析访谈记录。确定了一些与个人和职业融合的困境有关的主题。参与者对女同性恋和男同性恋问题的知识和经验在拥有专业知识和作为学生之间产生了紧张关系,这是通过监督披露来管理的。个人和职业融合的进一步障碍包括缺乏工作人员的支持,以及课程工作人员、主管、讲师和同龄人表现出反女同性恋/男同性恋情绪。这些发现表明,这些课程尚未达到英国心理学会(2002)的认证指南,该指南鼓励学员群体的多样性,并促进个人和专业的融合。最后提出了课程发展的指导思想和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BPS Lesbian & Gay Psychology Section 2003 Postgraduate Prize Winner Lesbian and gay trainees: The challenges of personal and professional integration
This article explores how lesbian and gay clinical psychology trainees attempted to integrate their personal identity with their developing professional identity. Three gay and six lesbian trainees were recruited by snowball sampling and via a lesbian and gay student website. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and interview transcripts were analysed using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. A number of themes were identified relating to the dilemmas of personal and professional integration. Participants’ knowledge and experience of lesbian and gay issues created tensions between holding specialist knowledge and being a student, which were managed by monitoring disclosure. Further barriers for personal and professional integration included a lack of staff support and displays of anti-lesbian/gay sentiment by course staff, supervisors, lecturers and peers. These findings suggest that courses have yet to meet the British Psychological Society’s (2002) accreditation guidelines, which encourage diversity within trainee cohorts and the facilitation of personal and professional integration. Guidelines for course development and directions for future research are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信