社会科学与人文领域研究成果评价标准的设计:若干理论问题

Nguyen Thu Trang, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh, Nguyen Thi Quynh Anh, Tran Tien Anh
{"title":"社会科学与人文领域研究成果评价标准的设计:若干理论问题","authors":"Nguyen Thu Trang, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh, Nguyen Thi Quynh Anh, Tran Tien Anh","doi":"10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As society evolves, so do people's needs for increasing awareness and knowledge. This is the driving force behind scientific advancement, including social sciences and humanities. The findings of humanities and social science research have made significant contributions to the ideological and scientific foundations of policymaking and development programs. Due to the distinctiveness of originality and creativity with varied values from scientific values, social practical values, informational values, etc., scientific and technical activities need to be identified, managed, and evaluated in accordance with the proper concepts, criteria, and standards. In a scientific research institution, evaluating scientific research outcomes is a critical task. One of the most crucial roles of evaluation is to comprehend the true scientific value of research findings. This article's objective is to provide a theoretical foundation for ongoing efforts to develop a comprehensive framework for evaluating research outputs in the humanities and social sciences. \nKeywords: Evaluation; scientific research findings; evaluation criteria; social science and humanities research; criteria; scientific research outputs. \n \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":273090,"journal":{"name":"VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Criteria for the Evaluation Research Findings in the Field of Social Science and Humanity: some Theoretical Issues\",\"authors\":\"Nguyen Thu Trang, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh, Nguyen Thi Quynh Anh, Tran Tien Anh\",\"doi\":\"10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As society evolves, so do people's needs for increasing awareness and knowledge. This is the driving force behind scientific advancement, including social sciences and humanities. The findings of humanities and social science research have made significant contributions to the ideological and scientific foundations of policymaking and development programs. Due to the distinctiveness of originality and creativity with varied values from scientific values, social practical values, informational values, etc., scientific and technical activities need to be identified, managed, and evaluated in accordance with the proper concepts, criteria, and standards. In a scientific research institution, evaluating scientific research outcomes is a critical task. One of the most crucial roles of evaluation is to comprehend the true scientific value of research findings. This article's objective is to provide a theoretical foundation for ongoing efforts to develop a comprehensive framework for evaluating research outputs in the humanities and social sciences. \\nKeywords: Evaluation; scientific research findings; evaluation criteria; social science and humanities research; criteria; scientific research outputs. \\n \\n  \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":273090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着社会的发展,人们对提高意识和知识的需求也在不断增长。这是推动科学进步的动力,包括社会科学和人文科学。人文社会科学的研究成果为政策制定和发展计划的思想和科学基础做出了重大贡献。由于原创性和创造性的独特性,具有科学价值、社会实用价值、信息价值等不同的价值,科技活动需要按照适当的概念、标准和标准进行识别、管理和评价。在科研机构中,评价科研成果是一项至关重要的工作。评价最重要的作用之一是理解研究成果的真正科学价值。本文的目的是为正在进行的开发评估人文社会科学研究成果的综合框架的努力提供理论基础。关键词:评价;科学研究成果;评估标准;社会科学与人文科学研究;标准;科研成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Criteria for the Evaluation Research Findings in the Field of Social Science and Humanity: some Theoretical Issues
As society evolves, so do people's needs for increasing awareness and knowledge. This is the driving force behind scientific advancement, including social sciences and humanities. The findings of humanities and social science research have made significant contributions to the ideological and scientific foundations of policymaking and development programs. Due to the distinctiveness of originality and creativity with varied values from scientific values, social practical values, informational values, etc., scientific and technical activities need to be identified, managed, and evaluated in accordance with the proper concepts, criteria, and standards. In a scientific research institution, evaluating scientific research outcomes is a critical task. One of the most crucial roles of evaluation is to comprehend the true scientific value of research findings. This article's objective is to provide a theoretical foundation for ongoing efforts to develop a comprehensive framework for evaluating research outputs in the humanities and social sciences. Keywords: Evaluation; scientific research findings; evaluation criteria; social science and humanities research; criteria; scientific research outputs.    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信