{"title":"加拿大对“杀手机器人”的政策方针和自主武器系统的伦理","authors":"Kari Zacharias, K. Schmitt","doi":"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ongoing international policy discussions on the regulation of autonomous weapons have advanced the concept of “meaningful human control” as an ethical benchmark for weapons systems. In academic discourse, ethical objections to the development and use of autonomous weapons systems include arguments based in feasibility, accountability, human dignity, and established rules for armed combat. This article situates current policy discussions on autonomous weapons systems, and Canadian policy in particular, with respect to the ethical discourse around such systems. We ask how the idea of meaningful human control intersects with various ethical objections to autonomous weapons, and propose a set of questions for policymakers.","PeriodicalId":314239,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canada’s policy approach to “killer robots” and the ethics of autonomous weapons systems\",\"authors\":\"Kari Zacharias, K. Schmitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ongoing international policy discussions on the regulation of autonomous weapons have advanced the concept of “meaningful human control” as an ethical benchmark for weapons systems. In academic discourse, ethical objections to the development and use of autonomous weapons systems include arguments based in feasibility, accountability, human dignity, and established rules for armed combat. This article situates current policy discussions on autonomous weapons systems, and Canadian policy in particular, with respect to the ethical discourse around such systems. We ask how the idea of meaningful human control intersects with various ethical objections to autonomous weapons, and propose a set of questions for policymakers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Canada’s policy approach to “killer robots” and the ethics of autonomous weapons systems
Ongoing international policy discussions on the regulation of autonomous weapons have advanced the concept of “meaningful human control” as an ethical benchmark for weapons systems. In academic discourse, ethical objections to the development and use of autonomous weapons systems include arguments based in feasibility, accountability, human dignity, and established rules for armed combat. This article situates current policy discussions on autonomous weapons systems, and Canadian policy in particular, with respect to the ethical discourse around such systems. We ask how the idea of meaningful human control intersects with various ethical objections to autonomous weapons, and propose a set of questions for policymakers.