控制点对投资者行为偏差影响的实证研究

A. S. Lather, Shilpa Jain, Shivani Anand
{"title":"控制点对投资者行为偏差影响的实证研究","authors":"A. S. Lather, Shilpa Jain, Shivani Anand","doi":"10.34218/ijm.11.1.2020.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between locus of control and behavioral biases (emotional and cognitive) in investor decision-making. Our research involved three stages. In the first stage, we undertook an exhaustive review of the existing literature to identify 20 commonly occurring biases in investor decision making. In the second stage, we individually studied each bias to identify and develop instruments for measuring these biases in investor decision making. During the pilot phase, based on exploratory factor analysis, some of these biases were clubbed together. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to develop a validated instrument for measuring these biases. In stage three, the finalized questionnaire along with Levenson’s locus of control was administered on a group of investors across the country and 618 responses were received. The results of this study have revealed underlying patterns within biases based on the Individual Control, Powerful others and Chance control. Investors with a high score on individual control showed significant differences and had a stronger inclination to being prone to Mental Accounting, Self Control, Framing, Illusion of Control, Regret Aversion, Recency, Availability, Anchoring and Adjustment, Optimism, Confirmation, Overconfidence and Endowment related biases. Further, Individuals having higher Chance control scores had a higher inclination to having cognitive dissonance within their investment decision making. Thus, results from this study helped understand the impact of locus of control on investor biases and preferences to facilitate the identification of an investor’s predisposition towards particular investing choices. This also serves as a mechanism to identify whether investors have an underlying inclination towards specific biases in investment decision making. This identification can facilitate remediation or corrective actions on part of the investor based on whether he has an internal or an external locus of control.","PeriodicalId":170437,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Other Psychology & Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Examination of the Impact of Locus of Control on Investor Behavioral Biases\",\"authors\":\"A. S. Lather, Shilpa Jain, Shivani Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.34218/ijm.11.1.2020.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between locus of control and behavioral biases (emotional and cognitive) in investor decision-making. Our research involved three stages. In the first stage, we undertook an exhaustive review of the existing literature to identify 20 commonly occurring biases in investor decision making. In the second stage, we individually studied each bias to identify and develop instruments for measuring these biases in investor decision making. During the pilot phase, based on exploratory factor analysis, some of these biases were clubbed together. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to develop a validated instrument for measuring these biases. In stage three, the finalized questionnaire along with Levenson’s locus of control was administered on a group of investors across the country and 618 responses were received. The results of this study have revealed underlying patterns within biases based on the Individual Control, Powerful others and Chance control. Investors with a high score on individual control showed significant differences and had a stronger inclination to being prone to Mental Accounting, Self Control, Framing, Illusion of Control, Regret Aversion, Recency, Availability, Anchoring and Adjustment, Optimism, Confirmation, Overconfidence and Endowment related biases. Further, Individuals having higher Chance control scores had a higher inclination to having cognitive dissonance within their investment decision making. Thus, results from this study helped understand the impact of locus of control on investor biases and preferences to facilitate the identification of an investor’s predisposition towards particular investing choices. This also serves as a mechanism to identify whether investors have an underlying inclination towards specific biases in investment decision making. This identification can facilitate remediation or corrective actions on part of the investor based on whether he has an internal or an external locus of control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DecisionSciRN: Other Psychology & Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DecisionSciRN: Other Psychology & Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34218/ijm.11.1.2020.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Other Psychology & Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34218/ijm.11.1.2020.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文的目的是研究投资者决策中的控制点与行为偏差(情感和认知)之间的关系。我们的研究分为三个阶段。在第一阶段,我们对现有文献进行了详尽的回顾,以确定投资者决策中常见的20种偏见。在第二阶段,我们分别研究了每种偏差,以识别和开发工具来衡量投资者决策中的这些偏差。在试点阶段,基于探索性因素分析,其中一些偏差被集中在一起。验证性因素分析是为了开发一种有效的工具来测量这些偏差。在第三阶段,最终确定的问卷以及Levenson的控制点对全国各地的一组投资者进行了管理,收到了618份回复。本研究的结果揭示了基于个人控制、强大他人和机会控制的偏见的潜在模式。个体控制得分高的投资者在心理会计、自我控制、框架、控制幻觉、后悔厌恶、近因、可用性、锚定与调整、乐观、确认、过度自信和禀赋相关偏差方面存在显著性差异。此外,机会控制得分较高的个体在投资决策中有更高的认知失调倾向。因此,本研究的结果有助于理解控制位点对投资者偏见和偏好的影响,从而有助于识别投资者对特定投资选择的倾向。这也可以作为一种机制来确定投资者在投资决策中是否有对特定偏见的潜在倾向。这种识别可以根据投资者是拥有内部控制点还是外部控制点,促进投资者采取补救或纠正措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Examination of the Impact of Locus of Control on Investor Behavioral Biases
The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between locus of control and behavioral biases (emotional and cognitive) in investor decision-making. Our research involved three stages. In the first stage, we undertook an exhaustive review of the existing literature to identify 20 commonly occurring biases in investor decision making. In the second stage, we individually studied each bias to identify and develop instruments for measuring these biases in investor decision making. During the pilot phase, based on exploratory factor analysis, some of these biases were clubbed together. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to develop a validated instrument for measuring these biases. In stage three, the finalized questionnaire along with Levenson’s locus of control was administered on a group of investors across the country and 618 responses were received. The results of this study have revealed underlying patterns within biases based on the Individual Control, Powerful others and Chance control. Investors with a high score on individual control showed significant differences and had a stronger inclination to being prone to Mental Accounting, Self Control, Framing, Illusion of Control, Regret Aversion, Recency, Availability, Anchoring and Adjustment, Optimism, Confirmation, Overconfidence and Endowment related biases. Further, Individuals having higher Chance control scores had a higher inclination to having cognitive dissonance within their investment decision making. Thus, results from this study helped understand the impact of locus of control on investor biases and preferences to facilitate the identification of an investor’s predisposition towards particular investing choices. This also serves as a mechanism to identify whether investors have an underlying inclination towards specific biases in investment decision making. This identification can facilitate remediation or corrective actions on part of the investor based on whether he has an internal or an external locus of control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信