心血管危险因素虚拟教育对全科医生心血管相关知识的影响

S. Abedini, Sahar Jomehpour, S. Fallahi, A. Ghanbarnejad, Marziyeh Nikparvar
{"title":"心血管危险因素虚拟教育对全科医生心血管相关知识的影响","authors":"S. Abedini, Sahar Jomehpour, S. Fallahi, A. Ghanbarnejad, Marziyeh Nikparvar","doi":"10.29252/JMIS.6.1.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: cardiovascular diseases as the most important diseases in the elderly are progressing conditions which start in childhood and show their clinical manifestations mostly during adulthood and midlife. Early diagnosis of these illnesses improves their prognosis and leads to their timely treatment; therefore, increasing the knowledge of medical personnel regarding their early diagnosis seems to me essential. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of virtual education on the knowledge of general practitioners (GPs) about cardiovascular risk factors. Methods: This was a before and after interventional study. The study sample consisted of 40 general practitioners who worked in General Service Centers of Bandar Abbas. Subject were recruited by a census method. The required data were gathered by means of a questionnaire in two phases: once before the intervention, an educational file about cardiovascular risk factors which was given to the subjects via multimedia methods including booklets, CD, and social networks (Telegram, Whatsapp, and etc.), and once after the intervention after a one month interval. The questionnaires were filled out in the presence of the researcher. The acquired data was entered into the SPSS software version 19 and analyzed by appropriate statistical tests. Results: The results of this study showed that the knowledge of GPs about diabetes and hypertension significantly increased after the intervention (P-Value=0.02 and P-Value=0.000 respectively). Their knowledge of physical activities, obesity, smoking, the role of gender, and dyslipidemia also increased after the intervention; however, the increase was not statistically significant (P-Value=0.973, P-Value=0.167, P-Value=0.211, P-Value=0.211, and P-Value=0.236 respectively). GPs were also asked about the preferred method for education (booklets, CDs, and social networks) in the post-test questionnaire. 80% had chosed booklets and 20% had chosen social networks as their preferred method. None of the GPs preferred CDs. Conclusion: According to the results of our study, seemingly GPs prefer educational booklets over CDs or social networks as a means of their scientific education and this method of education without the need to literally attend any programs can be useful to increase the knowledge of GPs in different fields.","PeriodicalId":231482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of virtual education of cardiovascular risk factors on the knowledge of general physicians\",\"authors\":\"S. Abedini, Sahar Jomehpour, S. Fallahi, A. Ghanbarnejad, Marziyeh Nikparvar\",\"doi\":\"10.29252/JMIS.6.1.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: cardiovascular diseases as the most important diseases in the elderly are progressing conditions which start in childhood and show their clinical manifestations mostly during adulthood and midlife. Early diagnosis of these illnesses improves their prognosis and leads to their timely treatment; therefore, increasing the knowledge of medical personnel regarding their early diagnosis seems to me essential. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of virtual education on the knowledge of general practitioners (GPs) about cardiovascular risk factors. Methods: This was a before and after interventional study. The study sample consisted of 40 general practitioners who worked in General Service Centers of Bandar Abbas. Subject were recruited by a census method. The required data were gathered by means of a questionnaire in two phases: once before the intervention, an educational file about cardiovascular risk factors which was given to the subjects via multimedia methods including booklets, CD, and social networks (Telegram, Whatsapp, and etc.), and once after the intervention after a one month interval. The questionnaires were filled out in the presence of the researcher. The acquired data was entered into the SPSS software version 19 and analyzed by appropriate statistical tests. Results: The results of this study showed that the knowledge of GPs about diabetes and hypertension significantly increased after the intervention (P-Value=0.02 and P-Value=0.000 respectively). Their knowledge of physical activities, obesity, smoking, the role of gender, and dyslipidemia also increased after the intervention; however, the increase was not statistically significant (P-Value=0.973, P-Value=0.167, P-Value=0.211, P-Value=0.211, and P-Value=0.236 respectively). GPs were also asked about the preferred method for education (booklets, CDs, and social networks) in the post-test questionnaire. 80% had chosed booklets and 20% had chosen social networks as their preferred method. None of the GPs preferred CDs. Conclusion: According to the results of our study, seemingly GPs prefer educational booklets over CDs or social networks as a means of their scientific education and this method of education without the need to literally attend any programs can be useful to increase the knowledge of GPs in different fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMIS.6.1.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMIS.6.1.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:心血管疾病是老年人最重要的疾病,其发病于儿童期,临床表现多在成年期和中年期。这些疾病的早期诊断可改善其预后并导致及时治疗;因此,在我看来,增加医务人员关于早期诊断的知识是至关重要的。本研究的目的是确定虚拟教育对全科医生心血管危险因素知识的影响。方法:采用介入前后对照研究。研究样本包括在阿巴斯港综合服务中心工作的40名全科医生。研究对象采用人口普查方法招募。通过问卷调查的方式,分两个阶段收集所需的数据:干预前,通过多媒体方式,包括小册子、CD、社交网络(Telegram、Whatsapp等)向受试者发放关于心血管危险因素的教育文件;干预后,每隔一个月发放一次。问卷是在研究者在场的情况下填写的。采集的数据输入SPSS软件19版,并进行相应的统计检验。结果:本研究结果显示,干预后全科医生对糖尿病和高血压的知识知晓程度显著提高(p值分别为0.02和0.000)。干预后,他们对体育活动、肥胖、吸烟、性别作用和血脂异常的认知也有所增加;p值=0.973,p值=0.167,p值=0.211,p值=0.211,p值=0.236,差异无统计学意义。在测试后的问卷调查中,全科医生还被问及首选的教育方法(小册子、cd和社交网络)。80%的人选择小册子,20%的人选择社交网络作为他们的首选方法。全科医生都不喜欢cd。结论:根据我们的研究结果,相对于cd或社交网络,全科医生似乎更喜欢教育小册子作为他们的科学教育手段,这种不需要真正参加任何课程的教育方法可以有效地增加全科医生在不同领域的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of virtual education of cardiovascular risk factors on the knowledge of general physicians
Aim: cardiovascular diseases as the most important diseases in the elderly are progressing conditions which start in childhood and show their clinical manifestations mostly during adulthood and midlife. Early diagnosis of these illnesses improves their prognosis and leads to their timely treatment; therefore, increasing the knowledge of medical personnel regarding their early diagnosis seems to me essential. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of virtual education on the knowledge of general practitioners (GPs) about cardiovascular risk factors. Methods: This was a before and after interventional study. The study sample consisted of 40 general practitioners who worked in General Service Centers of Bandar Abbas. Subject were recruited by a census method. The required data were gathered by means of a questionnaire in two phases: once before the intervention, an educational file about cardiovascular risk factors which was given to the subjects via multimedia methods including booklets, CD, and social networks (Telegram, Whatsapp, and etc.), and once after the intervention after a one month interval. The questionnaires were filled out in the presence of the researcher. The acquired data was entered into the SPSS software version 19 and analyzed by appropriate statistical tests. Results: The results of this study showed that the knowledge of GPs about diabetes and hypertension significantly increased after the intervention (P-Value=0.02 and P-Value=0.000 respectively). Their knowledge of physical activities, obesity, smoking, the role of gender, and dyslipidemia also increased after the intervention; however, the increase was not statistically significant (P-Value=0.973, P-Value=0.167, P-Value=0.211, P-Value=0.211, and P-Value=0.236 respectively). GPs were also asked about the preferred method for education (booklets, CDs, and social networks) in the post-test questionnaire. 80% had chosed booklets and 20% had chosen social networks as their preferred method. None of the GPs preferred CDs. Conclusion: According to the results of our study, seemingly GPs prefer educational booklets over CDs or social networks as a means of their scientific education and this method of education without the need to literally attend any programs can be useful to increase the knowledge of GPs in different fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信