W. Clímaco, E. F. Melo, D. P. Vaz, M. M. Saldanha, M. F. V. S. Pinto, Letícia Carolina Cleto Fernandes, N. Baião, L. Oliveira, F. Sant'Anna, M. Souza, L. J. Lara
{"title":"不同消毒方法对蛋壳微生物学和孵化蛋质量的影响","authors":"W. Clímaco, E. F. Melo, D. P. Vaz, M. M. Saldanha, M. F. V. S. Pinto, Letícia Carolina Cleto Fernandes, N. Baião, L. Oliveira, F. Sant'Anna, M. Souza, L. J. Lara","doi":"10.1590/s0100-204x2018001000011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different disinfection procedures as alternatives to formaldehyde fumigation on eggshell microbial load and quality of eggs from a 42-week-old Cobb commercial breeder flock. A total of 10,080 clean eggs collected from the nests were randomly distributed in a randomized complete block design, among the following treatment groups: 13.33 g m-3 formaldehyde fumigation, 5-10 ppm ozone fumigation, 6.36 mW cm-2 UV-C light irradiation, spraying with 1.56% hydrogen peroxide, spraying with 0.13% peracetic acid, spraying with water (wet control), and no disinfection procedure (dry control). Per treatment, eight samples of four eggs each were collected before and after the disinfection procedure, in order to count the number of Enterobacteriaceae and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria on the eggshell. Only eggs subjected to the formaldehyde and UV treatments showed a significant reduction in total aerobic mesophilic bacterial count on the eggshell, when compared with those of the dry control group. Treatments did not affect eggshell thickness and resistance force. UV light exposure is effective in reducing microbial load on 42-week-old breeder flock eggshells, without affecting their quality, and can be considered an alternative to formaldehyde disinfection.","PeriodicalId":185886,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eggshell microbiology and quality of hatching eggs subjected to different sanitizing procedures\",\"authors\":\"W. Clímaco, E. F. Melo, D. P. Vaz, M. M. Saldanha, M. F. V. S. Pinto, Letícia Carolina Cleto Fernandes, N. Baião, L. Oliveira, F. Sant'Anna, M. Souza, L. J. Lara\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0100-204x2018001000011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different disinfection procedures as alternatives to formaldehyde fumigation on eggshell microbial load and quality of eggs from a 42-week-old Cobb commercial breeder flock. A total of 10,080 clean eggs collected from the nests were randomly distributed in a randomized complete block design, among the following treatment groups: 13.33 g m-3 formaldehyde fumigation, 5-10 ppm ozone fumigation, 6.36 mW cm-2 UV-C light irradiation, spraying with 1.56% hydrogen peroxide, spraying with 0.13% peracetic acid, spraying with water (wet control), and no disinfection procedure (dry control). Per treatment, eight samples of four eggs each were collected before and after the disinfection procedure, in order to count the number of Enterobacteriaceae and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria on the eggshell. Only eggs subjected to the formaldehyde and UV treatments showed a significant reduction in total aerobic mesophilic bacterial count on the eggshell, when compared with those of the dry control group. Treatments did not affect eggshell thickness and resistance force. UV light exposure is effective in reducing microbial load on 42-week-old breeder flock eggshells, without affecting their quality, and can be considered an alternative to formaldehyde disinfection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2018001000011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2018001000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
摘要本研究旨在评价不同消毒方式替代甲醛熏蒸对42周龄科布商业种鸡蛋壳微生物负荷和鸡蛋品质的影响。采用完全随机区组设计,将采得的10080只干净鸡蛋随机分为以下处理组:13.33 g m-3甲醛熏蒸组、5-10 ppm臭氧熏蒸组、6.36 mW cm-2 UV-C光照射组、1.56%过氧化氢喷淋组、0.13%过氧乙酸喷淋组、水喷淋组(湿对照)和不消毒组(干对照)。每次处理前和消毒后分别采集8个样品,每个样品4个鸡蛋,以计数蛋壳上肠杆菌科细菌的数量和好氧中温细菌的总数。与干燥对照组相比,只有经过甲醛和紫外线处理的鸡蛋,蛋壳上的好氧嗜中温细菌总数显著减少。处理对蛋壳厚度和阻力无显著影响。紫外线照射可有效减少42周龄种鸡蛋壳上的微生物负荷,而不影响其质量,可被视为甲醛消毒的替代品。
Eggshell microbiology and quality of hatching eggs subjected to different sanitizing procedures
Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different disinfection procedures as alternatives to formaldehyde fumigation on eggshell microbial load and quality of eggs from a 42-week-old Cobb commercial breeder flock. A total of 10,080 clean eggs collected from the nests were randomly distributed in a randomized complete block design, among the following treatment groups: 13.33 g m-3 formaldehyde fumigation, 5-10 ppm ozone fumigation, 6.36 mW cm-2 UV-C light irradiation, spraying with 1.56% hydrogen peroxide, spraying with 0.13% peracetic acid, spraying with water (wet control), and no disinfection procedure (dry control). Per treatment, eight samples of four eggs each were collected before and after the disinfection procedure, in order to count the number of Enterobacteriaceae and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria on the eggshell. Only eggs subjected to the formaldehyde and UV treatments showed a significant reduction in total aerobic mesophilic bacterial count on the eggshell, when compared with those of the dry control group. Treatments did not affect eggshell thickness and resistance force. UV light exposure is effective in reducing microbial load on 42-week-old breeder flock eggshells, without affecting their quality, and can be considered an alternative to formaldehyde disinfection.