{"title":"FDA诊断超声法规","authors":"G. Myers","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.1985.198591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Food and Drug Administration has recently issued testing guidelines for ultrasonic diagnostic devices. Much test data defining the peak ultrasonic intensities in situ must now be included with 510(k) submissions, and measurements must be made with hydrophones. The guidelines present specific values of intensities for different applications; if the intensities of a new submission are lower than these values, in general the device is accepted.","PeriodicalId":240321,"journal":{"name":"IEEE 1985 Ultrasonics Symposium","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDA Regulation of Diagnostic Ultrasound\",\"authors\":\"G. Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.1985.198591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Food and Drug Administration has recently issued testing guidelines for ultrasonic diagnostic devices. Much test data defining the peak ultrasonic intensities in situ must now be included with 510(k) submissions, and measurements must be made with hydrophones. The guidelines present specific values of intensities for different applications; if the intensities of a new submission are lower than these values, in general the device is accepted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE 1985 Ultrasonics Symposium\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE 1985 Ultrasonics Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1985.198591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE 1985 Ultrasonics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1985.198591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Food and Drug Administration has recently issued testing guidelines for ultrasonic diagnostic devices. Much test data defining the peak ultrasonic intensities in situ must now be included with 510(k) submissions, and measurements must be made with hydrophones. The guidelines present specific values of intensities for different applications; if the intensities of a new submission are lower than these values, in general the device is accepted.