贵的更环保吗?三种家电产品的LCA比较

M. Shaukat, Hammad Masood, N. Merah, F. Al-Badour
{"title":"贵的更环保吗?三种家电产品的LCA比较","authors":"M. Shaukat, Hammad Masood, N. Merah, F. Al-Badour","doi":"10.1115/detc2021-71249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Due to rise in income and living standards in the developing world, there is a substantial growth in the use of home appliances. This growth is responsible for several environmental issues. Hence, there is a growing demand for energy efficient, environment friendly, and sustainable appliances. This study compares the environmental impacts of three home appliances using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Three irons of same power rating but with different prices (low, medium, and high) were selected for this study. First, energy consumption of these irons was measured and then they were disassembled to generate a detailed list of components, materials, and processes used to manufacture them. Next, LCA was conducted using SimaPro to compare the environmental impacts of these irons. Life cycle stages including material extraction, component manufacturing, assembly, distribution, and use were considered in LCA. Both ReCiPe mid-point and end-point environmental impacts were calculated. The results of this study showed that high-price iron was more environment friendly than the low-price iron.","PeriodicalId":318534,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Expensive More Environment Friendly? Comparative LCA of Three Home Appliances\",\"authors\":\"M. Shaukat, Hammad Masood, N. Merah, F. Al-Badour\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/detc2021-71249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Due to rise in income and living standards in the developing world, there is a substantial growth in the use of home appliances. This growth is responsible for several environmental issues. Hence, there is a growing demand for energy efficient, environment friendly, and sustainable appliances. This study compares the environmental impacts of three home appliances using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Three irons of same power rating but with different prices (low, medium, and high) were selected for this study. First, energy consumption of these irons was measured and then they were disassembled to generate a detailed list of components, materials, and processes used to manufacture them. Next, LCA was conducted using SimaPro to compare the environmental impacts of these irons. Life cycle stages including material extraction, component manufacturing, assembly, distribution, and use were considered in LCA. Both ReCiPe mid-point and end-point environmental impacts were calculated. The results of this study showed that high-price iron was more environment friendly than the low-price iron.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-71249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-71249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于发展中国家收入和生活水平的提高,家用电器的使用大幅增长。这种增长导致了一些环境问题。因此,对节能、环保和可持续的家电的需求不断增长。本研究采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法比较三种家电产品的环境影响。本研究选择了三种功率相同但价格不同的熨斗(低、中、高)。首先,测量这些熨斗的能耗,然后对它们进行拆卸,生成用于制造它们的部件、材料和工艺的详细列表。接下来,使用SimaPro进行LCA,比较这些铁对环境的影响。在LCA中考虑了包括材料提取、部件制造、装配、分销和使用在内的生命周期阶段。计算了ReCiPe中点和终点的环境影响。研究结果表明,高价格的铁比低价格的铁更环保。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Expensive More Environment Friendly? Comparative LCA of Three Home Appliances
Due to rise in income and living standards in the developing world, there is a substantial growth in the use of home appliances. This growth is responsible for several environmental issues. Hence, there is a growing demand for energy efficient, environment friendly, and sustainable appliances. This study compares the environmental impacts of three home appliances using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Three irons of same power rating but with different prices (low, medium, and high) were selected for this study. First, energy consumption of these irons was measured and then they were disassembled to generate a detailed list of components, materials, and processes used to manufacture them. Next, LCA was conducted using SimaPro to compare the environmental impacts of these irons. Life cycle stages including material extraction, component manufacturing, assembly, distribution, and use were considered in LCA. Both ReCiPe mid-point and end-point environmental impacts were calculated. The results of this study showed that high-price iron was more environment friendly than the low-price iron.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信