国际关系中的世俗主义政治

James G. Mellon
{"title":"国际关系中的世俗主义政治","authors":"James G. Mellon","doi":"10.1080/14690764.2010.499680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the Uniate Church, which was established in 1699, recognised the primacy of religious jurisdiction of Rome over Constantinople’. The Habsburgs are completely forgotten, and from this chapter one can get the idea that the Uniate Church is not such an artificial creature of political power, as suggested on page 14. A better review could have easily fixed all these drawbacks. The Uniate Church is not the only church whose description is spoiled by mistakes: on page 14, the Georgian Orthodox Church is listed among the Orthodox churches ‘incorporated under Russian jurisdiction’ in the Soviet era. Actually, the Georgian Patriarchate, re-established in 1917, was the only Orthodox authority within the Soviet borders to be (theoretically) autonomous from the Moscow Patriarchate. Another false statement is made on page 183, when, reporting the visit that Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia paid to Romania in 1964, Leustean claims that ‘Ethiopia was the only Orthodox Country in Africa’. The most important Church in Ethiopia is actually labelled as ‘Orthodox’, but it is not in ecclesiastical communion with the Orthodox churches, nor with the Romanian one. Being a pre-Chalcedonian church, the Ethiopian Church is rather in communion with the Coptic Church of Egypt, the Armenian Church and some other lesser-known churches of the Middle East. Despite of these shortcomings, however, Orthodoxy and the Cold War is a valuable work, well documented and well written. It provides an important contribution to the study of the contemporary history of Romania as well as of religious life under Communism.","PeriodicalId":440652,"journal":{"name":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Politics of Secularism in International Relations\",\"authors\":\"James G. Mellon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14690764.2010.499680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the Uniate Church, which was established in 1699, recognised the primacy of religious jurisdiction of Rome over Constantinople’. The Habsburgs are completely forgotten, and from this chapter one can get the idea that the Uniate Church is not such an artificial creature of political power, as suggested on page 14. A better review could have easily fixed all these drawbacks. The Uniate Church is not the only church whose description is spoiled by mistakes: on page 14, the Georgian Orthodox Church is listed among the Orthodox churches ‘incorporated under Russian jurisdiction’ in the Soviet era. Actually, the Georgian Patriarchate, re-established in 1917, was the only Orthodox authority within the Soviet borders to be (theoretically) autonomous from the Moscow Patriarchate. Another false statement is made on page 183, when, reporting the visit that Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia paid to Romania in 1964, Leustean claims that ‘Ethiopia was the only Orthodox Country in Africa’. The most important Church in Ethiopia is actually labelled as ‘Orthodox’, but it is not in ecclesiastical communion with the Orthodox churches, nor with the Romanian one. Being a pre-Chalcedonian church, the Ethiopian Church is rather in communion with the Coptic Church of Egypt, the Armenian Church and some other lesser-known churches of the Middle East. Despite of these shortcomings, however, Orthodoxy and the Cold War is a valuable work, well documented and well written. It provides an important contribution to the study of the contemporary history of Romania as well as of religious life under Communism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690764.2010.499680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690764.2010.499680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

成立于1699年的统一教会承认罗马对君士坦丁堡的最高宗教管辖权。哈布斯堡王朝完全被遗忘了,从这一章中我们可以看出,统一教会并不像第14页所说的那样,是政治权力的人造产物。一个更好的审查可以很容易地解决所有这些缺点。联合教会并不是唯一一个被错误描述所破坏的教会:在第14页,格鲁吉亚东正教教会被列为苏联时代“在俄罗斯管辖下合并”的东正教教会之一。实际上,1917年重新建立的格鲁吉亚宗主教区是苏联境内唯一一个(理论上)独立于莫斯科宗主教区的东正教当局。另一个错误的陈述是在第183页,当报道埃塞俄比亚皇帝海尔塞拉西在1964年访问罗马尼亚时,Leustean声称“埃塞俄比亚是非洲唯一的东正教国家”。埃塞俄比亚最重要的教会实际上被贴上了“东正教”的标签,但它既不与东正教教会共融,也不与罗马尼亚的教会共融。作为一个前迦克墩教会,埃塞俄比亚教会与埃及的科普特教会、亚美尼亚教会和其他一些不太知名的中东教会有很大的联系。然而,尽管有这些缺点,《东正教与冷战》仍然是一部有价值的作品,文献翔实,文笔优美。它为研究罗马尼亚当代历史以及共产主义统治下的宗教生活提供了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Politics of Secularism in International Relations
the Uniate Church, which was established in 1699, recognised the primacy of religious jurisdiction of Rome over Constantinople’. The Habsburgs are completely forgotten, and from this chapter one can get the idea that the Uniate Church is not such an artificial creature of political power, as suggested on page 14. A better review could have easily fixed all these drawbacks. The Uniate Church is not the only church whose description is spoiled by mistakes: on page 14, the Georgian Orthodox Church is listed among the Orthodox churches ‘incorporated under Russian jurisdiction’ in the Soviet era. Actually, the Georgian Patriarchate, re-established in 1917, was the only Orthodox authority within the Soviet borders to be (theoretically) autonomous from the Moscow Patriarchate. Another false statement is made on page 183, when, reporting the visit that Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia paid to Romania in 1964, Leustean claims that ‘Ethiopia was the only Orthodox Country in Africa’. The most important Church in Ethiopia is actually labelled as ‘Orthodox’, but it is not in ecclesiastical communion with the Orthodox churches, nor with the Romanian one. Being a pre-Chalcedonian church, the Ethiopian Church is rather in communion with the Coptic Church of Egypt, the Armenian Church and some other lesser-known churches of the Middle East. Despite of these shortcomings, however, Orthodoxy and the Cold War is a valuable work, well documented and well written. It provides an important contribution to the study of the contemporary history of Romania as well as of religious life under Communism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信