从首次出现的肿瘤大小和数量预测膀胱尿路上皮癌的分级

Mahbubul Islam Khandoker, Md Shamim Hossain, A. Azam, Muhammad, S. Islam, A. Perveg, M. A. Salam, A. Al-Miraj
{"title":"从首次出现的肿瘤大小和数量预测膀胱尿路上皮癌的分级","authors":"Mahbubul Islam Khandoker, Md Shamim Hossain, A. Azam, Muhammad, S. Islam, A. Perveg, M. A. Salam, A. Al-Miraj","doi":"10.20431/2456-060x.060101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Early diagnosis and prompt treatment can save lives of the patients with bladder cancer. The confirmatory test for grade of the disease is histopathological examination after transurethral resection. But if the grade of the tumor can be predicted at the time of presentation from size and number of tumors seen by ultrasonographic imaging, clinician can counsel the patient beforehand and also arrange rapid treatment to save life. Objective: To assess the size and number of tumors as clinical predictors of histological grade of urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder before first-time transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Urology, BSMMU and RGRH from January 2020 to April 2020. Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Size and number of the tumor was determined by preoperative ultrasonography of urinary bladder. Histopathological examination was used to determine the grade of the tumor after TURBT. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Mean age of the study subjects was 52.04 ± 18.37 years within the range of 22–95 years. Males (56.0%) were predominant than females (44.0%). Male to female ratio was 1.27:1. Mean number of tumor was 1.28 ± 0.64 (1-3) and mean tumor size was 3.54 ± 1.47 cm (1-7). High grade tumor was 26 (52.0%) and low grade tumor was 24 (48.0%). There was no significant association of tumor grading with number of tumor in this study. High grade tumor was significantly higher among the study subjects with tumor size >3.5 cm. Area under curve (AUC) of tumor number and tumor size was 0.558 and 0.827 respectively in prediction of tumor grading. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor number (at cut of value 3) was 15.4%, 95.8%, 80.0%, 51.1% and 54.0% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor size (at cut of value 3.5 cm) was 90.5%, 76.3%, 80.9%, 87.9% and 83.7% respectively. Overall Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor size was better than tumor number in prediction of tumor grading. Conclusion: According to this study finding, it can be concluded that the grade of newly diagnosed bladder tumors can be predicted with high accuracy using tumor size.","PeriodicalId":422096,"journal":{"name":"ARC Journal of Urology","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Grade of Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder from the Size and Number of Tumors at First Presentation\",\"authors\":\"Mahbubul Islam Khandoker, Md Shamim Hossain, A. Azam, Muhammad, S. Islam, A. Perveg, M. A. Salam, A. Al-Miraj\",\"doi\":\"10.20431/2456-060x.060101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Early diagnosis and prompt treatment can save lives of the patients with bladder cancer. The confirmatory test for grade of the disease is histopathological examination after transurethral resection. But if the grade of the tumor can be predicted at the time of presentation from size and number of tumors seen by ultrasonographic imaging, clinician can counsel the patient beforehand and also arrange rapid treatment to save life. Objective: To assess the size and number of tumors as clinical predictors of histological grade of urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder before first-time transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Urology, BSMMU and RGRH from January 2020 to April 2020. Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Size and number of the tumor was determined by preoperative ultrasonography of urinary bladder. Histopathological examination was used to determine the grade of the tumor after TURBT. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Mean age of the study subjects was 52.04 ± 18.37 years within the range of 22–95 years. Males (56.0%) were predominant than females (44.0%). Male to female ratio was 1.27:1. Mean number of tumor was 1.28 ± 0.64 (1-3) and mean tumor size was 3.54 ± 1.47 cm (1-7). High grade tumor was 26 (52.0%) and low grade tumor was 24 (48.0%). There was no significant association of tumor grading with number of tumor in this study. High grade tumor was significantly higher among the study subjects with tumor size >3.5 cm. Area under curve (AUC) of tumor number and tumor size was 0.558 and 0.827 respectively in prediction of tumor grading. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor number (at cut of value 3) was 15.4%, 95.8%, 80.0%, 51.1% and 54.0% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor size (at cut of value 3.5 cm) was 90.5%, 76.3%, 80.9%, 87.9% and 83.7% respectively. Overall Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor size was better than tumor number in prediction of tumor grading. Conclusion: According to this study finding, it can be concluded that the grade of newly diagnosed bladder tumors can be predicted with high accuracy using tumor size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARC Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARC Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20431/2456-060x.060101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARC Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20431/2456-060x.060101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期诊断和及时治疗可以挽救膀胱癌患者的生命。经尿道切除后的组织病理学检查是疾病级别的确定试验。但是,如果在出现肿瘤时,能从超声成像所见肿瘤的大小和数量来预测肿瘤的分级,临床医生就可以事先告知患者,也可以安排快速治疗以挽救生命。目的:探讨首次经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)前膀胱尿路上皮癌组织学分级与肿瘤大小、肿瘤数目的关系。方法:本横断面研究于2020年1月至2020年4月在泌尿外科、BSMMU和RGRH进行。50名患者参加了这项研究。术前膀胱超声检查确定肿瘤的大小和数目。采用组织病理学检查确定TURBT后肿瘤的分级。采用SPSS 22.0进行统计分析。结果:研究对象的平均年龄为52.04±18.37岁,年龄范围为22 ~ 95岁。男性占56.0%,女性占44.0%。男女比例为1.27:1。平均肿瘤数1.28±0.64(1-3)个,平均肿瘤大小3.54±1.47 cm(1-7)个。高分级26例(52.0%),低分级24例(48.0%)。在本研究中,肿瘤分级与肿瘤数量无显著相关性。在肿瘤大小>3.5 cm的研究对象中,高级别肿瘤的发生率明显更高。预测肿瘤分级时,肿瘤数目和肿瘤大小的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.558和0.827。敏感性为15.4%,特异性为95.8%,PPV、NPV和肿瘤数目(切值3)的准确性分别为80.0%、51.1%和54.0%。肿瘤大小(切值为3.5 cm)的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和准确性分别为90.5%、76.3%、80.9%、87.9%和83.7%。肿瘤大小的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV及准确性均优于肿瘤数量预测肿瘤分级。结论:根据本研究发现,利用肿瘤大小可以较准确地预测新诊断膀胱肿瘤的分级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Grade of Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder from the Size and Number of Tumors at First Presentation
Background: Early diagnosis and prompt treatment can save lives of the patients with bladder cancer. The confirmatory test for grade of the disease is histopathological examination after transurethral resection. But if the grade of the tumor can be predicted at the time of presentation from size and number of tumors seen by ultrasonographic imaging, clinician can counsel the patient beforehand and also arrange rapid treatment to save life. Objective: To assess the size and number of tumors as clinical predictors of histological grade of urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder before first-time transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Urology, BSMMU and RGRH from January 2020 to April 2020. Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Size and number of the tumor was determined by preoperative ultrasonography of urinary bladder. Histopathological examination was used to determine the grade of the tumor after TURBT. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Mean age of the study subjects was 52.04 ± 18.37 years within the range of 22–95 years. Males (56.0%) were predominant than females (44.0%). Male to female ratio was 1.27:1. Mean number of tumor was 1.28 ± 0.64 (1-3) and mean tumor size was 3.54 ± 1.47 cm (1-7). High grade tumor was 26 (52.0%) and low grade tumor was 24 (48.0%). There was no significant association of tumor grading with number of tumor in this study. High grade tumor was significantly higher among the study subjects with tumor size >3.5 cm. Area under curve (AUC) of tumor number and tumor size was 0.558 and 0.827 respectively in prediction of tumor grading. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor number (at cut of value 3) was 15.4%, 95.8%, 80.0%, 51.1% and 54.0% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor size (at cut of value 3.5 cm) was 90.5%, 76.3%, 80.9%, 87.9% and 83.7% respectively. Overall Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of tumor size was better than tumor number in prediction of tumor grading. Conclusion: According to this study finding, it can be concluded that the grade of newly diagnosed bladder tumors can be predicted with high accuracy using tumor size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信